Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,134
- 73,351
Zzzzz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
LolZzzzz
Look, I'm sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but I wanted to make a point. Sometimes, trying to converse with you is frustrating because you ignore large portions of what people say.Zzzzz
I read everything you say. I just do not respond to every word. Sorry. Nor will I ever. Do you think I have to spend time rebutting each and every claim you make? I don't. I don't misrepresent you. And I do not play the troll question game. Ever.Look, I'm sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but I wanted to make a point. Sometimes, trying to converse with you is frustrating because you ignore large portions of what people say.
No, I wouldn't expect you to respond to everything, but you tend to omit a relevant stuff, and its almost like you intentionally cut people's posts in order to change the context. Even though they may post an entire paragraph of explanation and context, you'll delete all of it, and make a post to a specific thing that that they just got done explaining, bit you will make a response tailored to fit your own talking point.I read everything you say. I just do not respond to every word. Sorry. Nor will I ever. Do you think I have to spend time rebutting each and every claim you make? I don't. I don't misrepresent you. And I do not play the troll question game. Ever.
But respond directly to the statement you are supporting with the "relevant stuff", which makes me a better poster than 75% of the people here. That's all a person needs to do. I am making my points. You make yours, I make mine. So it goes.but you tend to omit a relevant stuff
Sorry, don't get the attempted joke.I keep telling you those foil helmets don't really give you mind reading powers. Those thoughts you have are your own.
OK. Post 104But respond directly to the statement you are supporting with the "relevant stuff", which makes me a better poster than 75% of the people here. That's all a person needs to do. I am making my points. You make yours, I make mine. So it goes.
Yes I know. That is hot garbage. No, there are no allegations against democrats that need to be looked into. When you say there are, you are lying or mistaken. See? All that display by you, and we are exactly where we were anyway.I explained that there have been allegations that Pelosi had some communication with the capitol police that might need to be looked into
Actually, I've changed my mind on one thing. Yes, I do expect you to rebutt, or respond to individual points. This is because if someone makes points, it's likely in relation to the overall argument. If you choose to just brush them aside, and respond with a sentence of your choosing, then it completely negates the argument they were trying to make, at which point, what's the point of even responding, if you are just going to ignore their points?I read everything you say. I just do not respond to every word. Sorry. Nor will I ever. Do you think I have to spend time rebutting each and every claim you make? I don't. I don't misrepresent you. And I do not play the troll question game. Ever.
Well, you will be disappointed. No, there are no allegations against democrats that need to be looked into regarding the events of January 6th. No, I am not going to legitimize this laughable red herring by giving it any more time than it deserves, which is none. Sorry.Yes, I do expect you to rebutt, or respond to individual points.
Aaaand you did it again.Yes I know. That is hot garbage. No, there are no allegations against democrats that need to be looked into. When you say there are, you are lying or mistaken. See? All that display by you, and we are exactly where we were anyway.
and I also said that, in order to get to the truth, all allegations should be explored. I even said that it doesn't matter if you think it's fake news, in the interest of the truth, it should be investigated
That's right. Because you tried to make a general argument of just "brushing things aside". Undefined, does not directly address a word I said. So I brought you back to earth by reminding you of the point on the table. I will always ignore these silly non sequitur arguments. They are weak appeals to emotion and designed to waste time.You posted what YOU wanted to respond to, not the argument I was trying to make.
Yes, there are. Look at the news around that time. Accusations that help was requested, and was denied, and some say Pelosi, who, in part, controls the capitol police, who did not make a request to the national guard. Why? Why did the capitol police not make that request? Some believe she had something to do with that. Don't you think that should be looked into? Shouldn't her communications around that time be investigated in order to see what she was telling people?No, there are no allegations against democrats that need to be looked into regarding the events of January 6th.
Nope.Yes, there are.
So, you don't want to address the points of a post, you just want to insert your own.I will always ignore these silly non sequitur arguments.
It's a valid argument. Just because you don't think it is doesn't mean it's not.Find someone else to peddle that nonsense to.
It's not even an argument. It's a series of desperate, baseless claims, strung out in a row. Utter nonsense. You aren't getting equal time or validation from me for this desperate nonsense. Give it up.It's a valid argument. Just because you don't think it is doesn't mean it's not.
Ya know, this reply kind of proves my point. You are essentially saying "I have deemed that your argument is invalid and therefore I will simply not address it", and you do (or don't do) exactly that. You just ignore my argument.and just make a reply reinforcing your own argument.Well, you will be disappointed. No, there are no allegations against democrats that need to be looked into regarding the events of January 6th. No, I am not going to legitimize this laughable red herring by giving it any more time than it deserves, which is none. Sorry.
Sure it is. Are there not allegations against pelosi?It's not even an argument.