John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 27,658
- 14,367
- 1,288
You will never convince these left wing loons of anything outside of their self absorbed phony narrative.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You will never convince these left wing loons of anything outside of their self absorbed phony narrative.
He’s charged with not allowing a personal matter to become public which is perfectly fine. Since the witch hunters knew that they twisted the payment methodology via its source into an illegality. They connect the unspecified dots to somehow lead to guilt.But trump didn’t commit the crimes he was convicted for.
I’ll post both of the relevant laws:
*§ 175.05 Falsifying business records in the second degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree
when, with intent to defraud, he:
1. Makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise; or
2. Alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true
entry in the business records of an enterprise; or
3. Omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise
in violation of a duty to do so which he knows to be imposed upon him by
law or by the nature of his position; or
4. Prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof
in the business records of an enterprise.
Falsifying business records in the second degree is a class A
misdemeanor.*
*
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.*
Do you see the problem with the laws..compared to what Trump did?
Let’s hear from them but once again this dark cloud of gagging free and thinking speech is likely in placeThey would think, Weatherbee, that you are wrong.
The judge made a bad decision, gave the jury some bad instructions and they found him guilty off of those bad instructions.You really don't get it? The Judge has made the decisions, instructed the Jury, and they found him guilty.
I know, the law was tossed out the window to achieve a desired result.Have no fear
No law applied here
Of course not. Seems like that is kind of the theme of this message board lolYou will never convince these left wing loons of anything outside of their self absorbed phony narrative.
Yeah. The whole world learned, that Democrats are nothing but Stalinist pigs.The dif was J6 and you learned.
Did you read the law? Did you follow all of the lawyers and pundits who said Bragg's case was strong?Did you read the law? Did you follow all of the lawyers and pundits who said braggs[sic] case was weak and shaky?
Did you read the law? Did you follow all of the lawyers and pundits who said Bragg's case was strong?
WrongAgainYeah, I read the law…the law wasn’t followed.
Then you didn’t read the laws that Bragg used, it’s very plain.WrongAgain
"Upper" courts?Then you didn’t read the laws that Bragg used, it’s very plain.
I would expect no less though, you all got your way here and you have to protect it at all costs.
Let’s see how the upper courts handle this.
Also they took a legal act and put witch hunt magic on it by declaring the method of payment illegal therefore the act itself illegal.The judge made a bad decision, gave the jury some bad instructions and they found him guilty off of those bad instructions.
Why is it so hard for you to read the laws I posted and SEE why it was wrong. It’s like you all know you got your way and now you are going to ignore what is in plain sight.
Does the law not state that intent to defraud is required? Were the records that were falsified not internal records nobody would ever see?
Where is the intent to defraud?
Yes, upper courts. Do you have an issue with them?"Upper" courts?
![]()
Did you read the law? Did you follow all of the lawyers and pundits who said braggs case was weak and shaky?
What, you think that since Trump was found guilty that there was no foul play? There are probably a lot of lawyers, after that verdict, who are saying “I cannot believe that bullshit worked”
The abuse of the law is why this will end up in appeals and most likely the Supreme Court.