Ray, I'm pretty certain I've mentioned this before....but the banning of the article for a couple of days on social media,So in other words you just made your claim up. The fact is a percentage of people DO get their news from social media. That's why the commies sent their FBI to censor the story. That 16% would have changed the entire election and Trump would be our President today. That would mean reasonable fuel prices, no war in Ukraine, no inflation, stock market stable and growing, Afghanistan withdrawal handled the right way and 13 dead Americans would still be alive, a secured southern border. We lost all that thanks to the government controlling what was allowed on social media, and now everybody is suffering, especially those of us that depended on our IRA.
gave the NY POST their biggest read article in their history, the 7 days following release!!!!
The term used for it, is called The Streisand Effect....
Something you try to ban, brings attention to it. It does the absolute opposite of what a ban is suppose to do.
More people read the Hunter lap top story, than would have if it were not held back.
Trump still lost.