So on Tuesday when Trump gets arrested…

[rightwinger]

Are we going to see him in handcuffs? And will they show his mugshot?



Personally I don’t think there’s anything good that can come from this, just a more fractured country.

I hope Trump doesn’t start another riot
He likes to do that

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They've already made arrangements, in case he is indicted....

Law enforcement agencies are prepping for a possible Trump indictment as early as next week

Multiple agencies are discussing potential security plans for in and around the Manhattan Criminal Court in case Trump is charged in connection with an alleged hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

www.nbcnews.com

March 17, 2023, 1:27 PM EDT
By Jonathan Dienst
Local, state and federal law enforcement and security agencies are preparing for the possibility that former President Donald Trump will be indicted as early as next week, according to five senior officials familiar with the preparations.

Law enforcement agencies are conducting preliminary security assessments, the officials said, and are discussing potential security plans in and around the Manhattan Criminal Court, at 100 Centre Street, in case Trump is charged in connection with an alleged hush money payment to Stormy Daniels and travels to New York to face any charges.

The officials stress that the interagency conversations and planning are precautionary in nature because no charges have been filed.

The agencies involved include the NYPD, New York State Court Officers, the U.S. Secret Service, the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, the officials said.
NBC News has reached out to all of those agencies for comment, and all have declined to comment.

Trump's attorney, Joe Tacopina, told NBC News that the former president will follow normal procedures if it gets to the point of having to surrender to authorities from the DA’s office.

Hush money. So what action had the most impact on our last presidential election, the hush money (if true and unproven so far) or the fact the FBI silenced social media about Hunter and his laptop? Here, I'll give you a hint:

FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.

thepostmillennial.com

 

[Dekster]

Are we going to see him in handcuffs? And will they show his mugshot?



Personally I don’t think there’s anything good that can come from this, just a more fractured country.

You will see a mugshot but he won't be cuffed. He will have his mugshot taken, fingerprints digitally scanned be given some paperwork and might go before a judge to have his charges read. Then he will come out of the courthouse and whine and by the end of the day he will have suckered people out of millions donating to his legal defense. Guy is a con artist. Only one perhaps better at the grift than him is Biden.

 

[AntonToo]

Are we going to see him in handcuffs? And will they show his mugshot?



Personally I don’t think there’s anything good that can come from this, just a more fractured country.

How about law & order?

You think there is anything good about that or should we have a special criminal justice system for special people?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney's office won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict former President Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a legal expert and former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

A settlement payment of a nuisance claim is not a federal campaign expense," said von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation. "The state DA has no authority to prosecute a federal campaign finance violation in any event."

Such cases, he argues, are within the province of the FEC, where he served as a commissioner, or the U.S. Justice Department, explaining that both agencies have known about the facts for years but have chosen not to prosecute Trump.

In 2018, von Spakovsky wrote that the payment to Daniels seemed to be a "nuisance settlement," which celebrities often make, especially when faced with the threat of a false or salacious claim.

"Critics of the president claim this not only was a campaign expense that should have been reported but a potentially illegal loan by Cohen. But the settlement was ultimately paid out of Trump's personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign," wrote von Spakovsky. "No reasonable member of a jury would consider this to be a campaign-related expense that needed to be reported, or to which any other campaign finance rules in the Federal Election Campaign Act apply."

"The alleged one-night stand between Daniels and Trump is far more of a stretch," wrote von Spakovsky. "Daniels had no connection to the presidential campaign of any kind and the encounter — if it occurred — didn't happen during the campaign itself. In any event, even if the Daniels payment were to be considered a campaign-related expense, unlike Edwards, the nominal $130,000 payment wasn't made by Trump campaign donors but by Trump's personal attorney (not the campaign's attorney) with whom he has a long-standing business relationship. . . . Even if one might be able to reasonably construe the payment to Daniels as somehow related to the presidential campaign, there still would be no violation since candidates are allowed to spend as much of their own money as they want on their own campaigns."

Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate campaign law: FEC expert

Prosecutors won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a former FEC commissioner.

www.foxnews.com

This Soros clown is out of his league. He's trying to prosecute a potential federal violation on a city level.

 

[Care4all]

Hush money. So what action had the most impact on our last presidential election, the hush money (if true and unproven so far) or the fact the FBI silenced social media about Hunter and his laptop? Here, I'll give you a hint:

FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.

thepostmillennial.com

The poll is false.

The crime is not hush money paid, paying hush money is legal.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You will see a mugshot but he won't be cuffed. He will have his mugshot taken, fingerprints digitally scanned be given some paperwork and might go before a judge to have his charges read. Then he will come out of the courthouse and whine and by the end of the day he will have suckered people out of millions donating to his legal defense. Guy is a con artist. Only one perhaps better at the grift than him is Biden.

They will have to fly to Florida to try and arrest him. Good luck with that one.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The poll is false.

The crime is not hush money paid, paying hush money is legal.

That's what they claim they're charging him for. What poll are you talking about. It's not a poll about anything.

 

[Care4all]

Prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney's office won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict former President Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a legal expert and former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

A settlement payment of a nuisance claim is not a federal campaign expense," said von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation. "The state DA has no authority to prosecute a federal campaign finance violation in any event."

Such cases, he argues, are within the province of the FEC, where he served as a commissioner, or the U.S. Justice Department, explaining that both agencies have known about the facts for years but have chosen not to prosecute Trump.

In 2018, von Spakovsky wrote that the payment to Daniels seemed to be a "nuisance settlement," which celebrities often make, especially when faced with the threat of a false or salacious claim.

"Critics of the president claim this not only was a campaign expense that should have been reported but a potentially illegal loan by Cohen. But the settlement was ultimately paid out of Trump's personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign," wrote von Spakovsky. "No reasonable member of a jury would consider this to be a campaign-related expense that needed to be reported, or to which any other campaign finance rules in the Federal Election Campaign Act apply."

"The alleged one-night stand between Daniels and Trump is far more of a stretch," wrote von Spakovsky. "Daniels had no connection to the presidential campaign of any kind and the encounter — if it occurred — didn't happen during the campaign itself. In any event, even if the Daniels payment were to be considered a campaign-related expense, unlike Edwards, the nominal $130,000 payment wasn't made by Trump campaign donors but by Trump's personal attorney (not the campaign's attorney) with whom he has a long-standing business relationship. . . . Even if one might be able to reasonably construe the payment to Daniels as somehow related to the presidential campaign, there still would be no violation since candidates are allowed to spend as much of their own money as they want on their own campaigns."

Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate campaign law: FEC expert

Prosecutors won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a former FEC commissioner.

www.foxnews.com

This Soros clown is out of his league. He's trying to prosecute a potential federal crime on a city level.

Soros is 94 years old ray, getting ready to meet his maker....

If the grand jury indicts Trump, they believe and will have, NY STATE STATUTES that they believe he broke....

If your sideline lawyers and ex officials are correct, and if the DA decides to pursue indictments ...the Judge will have say on whether there is NY STATE legal merit to go forward, and will drop the case if it doesn't have merit, is what I believe the process involves.

 

[Chillicothe]

That's what they claim they're charging him for

Who is the 'they' you use in your assertion?
Is there a link?

 

[Dekster]

They will have to fly to Florida to try and arrest him. Good luck with that one.

Reports I saw were that they had already been making arrangements for Trump to fly to NYC which is how he knew it would be Tuesday. Trump isn't going to sitting in a jail cell awaiting extradition for a charge he can get cashless bail for by flying to NYC and grandstanding in front of cameras instead.

 

[Care4all]

That's what they claim they're charging him for. What poll are you talking about. It's not a poll about anything.

16% polling on if they knew of hunter story b4 election crapola etc.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

16% polling on if they knew of hunter story b4 election crapola etc.

So what's false about it? Point it out.

 

[leftwinger]

16% polling on if they knew of hunter story b4 election crapola etc.

Hunter? He of latop fame?
two-tier justice system that ignores the 459 documented crimes found in Hunter Biden's laptop.
•140 business crimes
•191 sex crimes
•128 drug crimes

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Who is the 'they' you use in your assertion?
Is there a link?

I provided one. Try reading it.

 

[Care4all]

Trump is going to turn himself in, and NOT be arrested....He's just trying to trigger you by claiming anything to do with being arrested.

He'd be foolish to become a Fugitive, when he can simple walk in and walk out, for this kind of alleged non violent crime.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Soros is 94 years old ray, getting ready to meet his maker....

If the grand jury indicts Trump, they believe and will have, NY STATE STATUTES that they believe he broke....

If your sideline lawyers and ex officials are correct, and if the DA decides to pursue indictments ...the Judge will have say on whether there is NY STATE legal merit to go forward, and will drop the case if it doesn't have merit, is what I believe the process involves.

Of course, but it's the concept of political harassment here, and I hope if they want to pull this stunt, that Trump sues the city for multi-millions of dollars. There is no local violation or crime in a federal campaign.

 

[Care4all]

Hunter? He of latop fame?
two-tier justice system that ignores the 459 documented crimes found in Hunter Biden's laptop.
•140 business crimes
•191 sex crimes
•128 drug crimes

Trump's doj? Trump's FBI?

Actually the DC Or Delaware FBI office with the laptop they subpoenaed from the computer shop owner, can only search the laptop, for what they put in their subpoena for judge approval....

It's illegal for them to go on a fishing expedition in his lap top for crimes to find.

They only have court permission to search it, for the probable crime they listed on the subpoena for the search.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump is going to turn himself in, and NOT be arrested....He's just trying to trigger you by claiming anything to do with being arrested.

He'd be foolish to become a Fugitive, when he can simple walk in and walk out, for this kind of alleged non violent crime.

I don't know why he would turn himself in when the charges are complete bullshit. No crime or violation of NYC laws. This Soros paid moron is acting out of his jurisdiction.

 

[leftwinger]

Trump's doj? Trump's FBI?

Actually the DC Or Delaware FBI office with the laptop they subpoenaed from the computer shop owner, can only search the laptop, for what they put in their subpoena for judge approval....

It's illegal for them to go on a fishing expedition in his lap top for crimes to find.

They only have court permission to search it, for the probable crime they listed on the subpoena for the search.

Nice spin again. Underage girls. Technicalites. Trumps DOJ? Lol! He had to fight them too. Uniparty much?