So on Tuesday when Trump gets arrested…

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump's doj? Trump's FBI?

Actually the DC FBI office with the laptop they subpoenaed from the computer shop owner, can only search the laptop, for what they put in their subpoena for judge approval....

It's illegal for them to go on a fishing expedition in his lap top for crimes to find.

They only have court permission to search it, for the probable crime they listed on the subpoena for the search.

Wrong. The owner of the laptop is the shop owner. All his customers sign an agreement that if they don't pick up their merchandise in X amount of days, it becomes the property of the shop itself. If the FBI needed permission from anybody, it's John Paul Mac Isaac which of course he gave.

 

[BackAgain]

It will be cool if these new witnesses lead to a delay in Bragg’s machinations.

Our poor libtards will be whining and crying if there is no “arrest” on Tuesday.

 

[Care4all]

So what's false about it? Point it out.

No democrat would believe a tabloid NY POST story given to them as a political October Surprise by Rudy Giuliani, Trump's campaign Lawyer who was head deep involved in Trump's first impeachment and crooked shenanigans, without a thorough examination and fact check on the laptop....

 

[Care4all]

Wrong. The owner of the laptop is the shop owner. All his customers sign an agreement that if they don't pick up their merchandise in X amount of days, it becomes the property of the shop itself. If the FBI needed permission from anybody, it's John Paul Mac Isaac which of course he gave.

The laptop does, BUT NOT THE PERSONAL, PRIVATE DOCUMENTS AND CONTENTS of Hunter's.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No democrat would believe a tabloid NY POST story given to them as a political October Surprise by Rudy Giuliani, Trump's campaign Lawyer who was head deep involved in Trump's first impeachment and crooked shenanigans, without a thorough examination and fact check on the laptop....

So in other words you just made your claim up. The fact is a percentage of people DO get their news from social media. That's why the commies sent their FBI to censor the story. That 16% would have changed the entire election and Trump would be our President today. That would mean reasonable fuel prices, no war in Ukraine, no inflation, stock market stable and growing, Afghanistan withdrawal handled the right way and 13 dead Americans would still be alive, a secured southern border. We lost all that thanks to the government controlling what was allowed on social media, and now everybody is suffering, especially those of us that depended on our IRA.

 

[Lesh]

I don't know why he would turn himself in when the charges are complete bullshit. No crime or violation of NYC laws. This Soros paid moron is acting out of his jurisdiction.

Excuse me? He is the unindicted co-conspirator in the crimes that put Cohen in jail for almost two years

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The laptop does, BUT NOT THE PERSONAL, PRIVATE DOCUMENTS AND CONTENTS of Hunter's.

Nope, everything.

 

[Care4all]

Nope, everything.

Nope! Not under Delaware law.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Excuse me? He is the unindicted co-conspirator in the crimes that put Cohen in jail for almost two years

He conspired to nothing. He supposedly repaid the money Cohen spent. No violation of any laws.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nope! Not under Delaware law.

Then post it.

 

[Lesh]

Nope, everything.

Nope. Wrong as always Stupid Ray

 

[Lesh]

He conspired to nothing. He supposedly repaid the money Cohen spent. No violation of any laws.

He's listed that way in the Cohen indictment jackass

 

[mak2]

Nope, everything.

I have the codes saved on my phone to my play money account. Lets say I take it to the shop and forget about it. Are you saying the shop could empty my savings account legally?

 

[Lesh]

I have the codes saved on my phone to my play money account. Lets say I take it to the shop and forget about it. Are you saying the shop could empty my savings account legally?

Ray is never right about anything. But he's so CONFIDENT in his lies

 

[BackAgain]

No democrat would believe a tabloid NY POST story given to them as a political October Surprise by Rudy Giuliani, Trump's campaign Lawyer who was head deep involved in Trump's first impeachment and crooked shenanigans, without a thorough examination and fact check on the laptop....

Uhm. Huh? Hunter’s laptop which was denied by many leftists as disinformation was recently verified by Hunter, himself, as real.

I don’t think it was Rudy who dropped Hunter’s laptop off at a computer repairman’s place. Rudy didn’t insert the images of Hunter with whores or smiling crack on that laptop. And Rudy clearly isn’t responsible in any way for whatever emails etc Hunter had stored in his laptop.

So, try again. Maybe consider using reality this time.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I have the codes saved on my phone to my play money account. Lets say I take it to the shop and forget about it. Are you saying the shop could empty my savings account legally?

Oh come on. Apples and oranges. Try to think of a better example.

 

[Chillicothe]

Who is the 'they' Cleveland references?
Got a link?

I provided one. Try reading it.

Well, actually Cleveland, you didn't.
So, lemme ask again (referencing your statement in #488) --- who is the 'they' that you claim said they were indicting Trump on paying off the porn queen?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

He's listed that way in the Cohen indictment jackass

It's not a local violation or crime jackass. NYC has nothing to do with campaign laws or possible violations.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nope. Wrong as always Stupid Ray

If I legally take possession of a laptop, everything belongs to me, not just the physical device itself.

 

[Lesh]

If I legally take possession of a laptop, everything belongs to me, not just the physical device itself.

Nope.

If a laptop or phone is left in a shop you do NOT get possession of the data on it