So republicans now that you know that cutting taxes for the wealthy has proven to be a poor...

[TooTall]

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof. 1.1 million jobs in JOB GROWTH is all Bush has to show for.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

CBO Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today FDL News Desk

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update

Sam Brownback s failed experiment puts state on path to penury - The Washington Post

Wealth isn't taxed in the United States so how do you cut it?

 

[AmericanFirst]

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof. 1.1 million jobs in JOB GROWTH is all Bush has to show for.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

CBO Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today FDL News Desk

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update

Sam Brownback s failed experiment puts state on path to penury - The Washington Post

Keep up the lies, they really make you look bad.

 

[Billy000]

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof. 1.1 million jobs in JOB GROWTH is all Bush has to show for.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

CBO Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today FDL News Desk

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update

Sam Brownback s failed experiment puts state on path to penury - The Washington Post

Keep up the lies, they really make you look bad.

I gave you facts from non partisan sources. They aren't lies. Grow up.

 

[AmericanFirst]

You're a cock-sucking piece of shit on the internet spewing the bullshit preached to you on the Comedy Channel.

The US economy will slowly recover no matter who is POTUS because it is large and there are checks and balances that prevent Obama from destroying everything he wants to destroy (Congress and the Courts stop him).

His policies have made any growth slower and has put some sectors and companies out of business for good.

The bitch running for the US Senate in Kentucky was caught on video telling her supporters she is going to take down the coal industry, then she goes out in public talking about defending coal from Obama. That is pretty much the proof you idiots are more interested in destroying the US economy than fixing it.

ASSWIPE...you are just a fucking retard if you haven't noticed what happened in Blue state Michigan with Detroit run by scum like you going back to the 60s.

You are also a fucking idiot to not know about the flight of jobs from northern Blue rust belt states to Red sun belt states like TN, AL, FL.

It is because scum like you turned those Blue states into welfare dumps with high taxes on companies and the rich, who in turn packed up and left leaving shitholes like Detroit in its own shit.

Lol you must have gotten that degree online. You haven't answered my question. Where is the evidence red states on average have better job growth than blue states. Texas alone doesn't do dick for your argument.

Uh shitbag....Texas is blowing away shithole states that have people like you.

New York was running TV ads begging companies to come back to NY with the promise of ZERO taxes for the first 10 years......why is that dumbfuck???

Why would they need to promise NO TAXES to lure companies.

FYI....I have a BA in Economics and a MBA, shut the fuck up idiot.

Lol you still haven't provided any proof of any of your claims.

You are right that Texas has an impressive economy. However that has more to do with the industries that have always been there such as the energy. That industry has always been booming. However, there is no evidence this has to do with cutting taxes. Red states like Mississippi has always been a poor state despite low taxes. Not only that but job growth in Texas under Bush was pathetic. It didn't improve until 2010.

Lol you can't talk about anecdotal stories of fracking and expect that to be evidence of anything. Statistics is what matters. You are also a hypocrite. You claim the poor job growth in Texas during Bush has nothing to with Bush yet you blame Obama for slow recovery now. You are pathetic.

You can't claim obutthurt's job record is better when it isn't either. LIAR!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't say high taxes stimuluates economic growth. I said cutting taxes does very little to stimuluates growth. There are much more effective ways to boost growth.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for. Clinton's job growth was just as good. Both Bush presidents had pathetic job growth in comparison to Obama.

ND's growth has to do with the energy industry as well. Obviously that has always been the case for that industry. Cutting taxes, again, is not why Texas and ND have strong growth. Tell me how do you explain California's job growth? Taxes aren't low there.

Uh, care to compare the economic growth under Reagan compared to Carter?

My 45 years living on this planet and my college education in this area give me the expertise to say you are full of shit claiming higher taxes stimulates growth.

North Dakota is growing faster than New York because of fossil fuel exploration which is banned in NY and because of lower taxes for companies and people....shut the fuck up, asswipe.

You're a cock-sucking piece of shit on the internet spewing the bullshit preached to you on the Comedy Channel.

The US economy will slowly recover no matter who is POTUS because it is large and there are checks and balances that prevent Obama from destroying everything he wants to destroy (Congress and the Courts stop him).

His policies have made any growth slower and has put some sectors and companies out of business for good.

The bitch running for the US Senate in Kentucky was caught on video telling her supporters she is going to take down the coal industry, then she goes out in public talking about defending coal from Obama. That is pretty much the proof you idiots are more interested in destroying the US economy than fixing it.

ASSWIPE...you are just a fucking retard if you haven't noticed what happened in Blue state Michigan with Detroit run by scum like you going back to the 60s.

You are also a fucking idiot to not know about the flight of jobs from northern Blue rust belt states to Red sun belt states like TN, AL, FL.

It is because scum like you turned those Blue states into welfare dumps with high taxes on companies and the rich, who in turn packed up and left leaving shitholes like Detroit in its own shit.

Lol you still haven't provided any proof of any of your claims.

You are right that Texas has an impressive economy. However that has more to do with the industries that have always been there such as the energy. That industry has always been booming. However, there is no evidence this has to do with cutting taxes. Red states like Mississippi has always been a poor state despite low taxes. Not only that but job growth in Texas under Bush was pathetic. It didn't improve until 2010.

Lol you can't talk about anecdotal stories of fracking and expect that to be evidence of anything. Statistics is what matters. You are also a hypocrite. You claim the poor job growth in Texas during Bush has nothing to with Bush yet you blame Obama for slow recovery now. You are pathetic.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for.

He cut the top rate from 70% to 28%.
Job growth was great.
Is that yourproof that tax cuts "do very little to stimulate growth"?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

..
So republicans now that you know that cutting taxes for the wealthy has proven to be a poor...

typical illiterate liberal does not know that top 1% pay 40% of federal income tax while it was 22% under Reagan!!

See why we say pure ignorance?

 

[Billy000]

I didn't say high taxes stimuluates economic growth. I said cutting taxes does very little to stimuluates growth. There are much more effective ways to boost growth.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for. Clinton's job growth was just as good. Both Bush presidents had pathetic job growth in comparison to Obama.

ND's growth has to do with the energy industry as well. Obviously that has always been the case for that industry. Cutting taxes, again, is not why Texas and ND have strong growth. Tell me how do you explain California's job growth? Taxes aren't low there.

Uh, care to compare the economic growth under Reagan compared to Carter?

My 45 years living on this planet and my college education in this area give me the expertise to say you are full of shit claiming higher taxes stimulates growth.

North Dakota is growing faster than New York because of fossil fuel exploration which is banned in NY and because of lower taxes for companies and people....shut the fuck up, asswipe.

You're a cock-sucking piece of shit on the internet spewing the bullshit preached to you on the Comedy Channel.

The US economy will slowly recover no matter who is POTUS because it is large and there are checks and balances that prevent Obama from destroying everything he wants to destroy (Congress and the Courts stop him).

His policies have made any growth slower and has put some sectors and companies out of business for good.

The bitch running for the US Senate in Kentucky was caught on video telling her supporters she is going to take down the coal industry, then she goes out in public talking about defending coal from Obama. That is pretty much the proof you idiots are more interested in destroying the US economy than fixing it.

Lol you still haven't provided any proof of any of your claims.

You are right that Texas has an impressive economy. However that has more to do with the industries that have always been there such as the energy. That industry has always been booming. However, there is no evidence this has to do with cutting taxes. Red states like Mississippi has always been a poor state despite low taxes. Not only that but job growth in Texas under Bush was pathetic. It didn't improve until 2010.

Lol you can't talk about anecdotal stories of fracking and expect that to be evidence of anything. Statistics is what matters. You are also a hypocrite. You claim the poor job growth in Texas during Bush has nothing to with Bush yet you blame Obama for slow recovery now. You are pathetic.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for.

He cut the top rate from 70% to 28%.
Job growth was great.
Is that yourproof that tax cuts "do very little to stimulate growth"?

There really isn't any evidence that tax cutting had to do with it. Again, why was job growth under Bush so pathetic? Why did the Kansas experiment fail? Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps because hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

 

[Billy000]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps becuase hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

True but why does it still have a higher tax rate than Texas?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps becuase hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

True but why does it still have a higher tax rate than Texas?

dear, there are many many factors involved. Ireland has low taxes but that does not make it richest

 

[Billy000]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps becuase hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

True but why does it still have a higher tax rate than Texas?

dear, there are many many factors involved. Ireland has low taxes but that does not make it richest

Well my overall point is that there no evidence that cutting taxes for the wealthy significantly stimuluates job growth.

 

[1776]

People have been leaving California for Colorado, Idaho, Utah, Arizona and Nevada because of high taxes and high costs of living in California.

But of course, that can't be true because there are still crazy people that are willing to live there for the beach, mountains and weather despite losing most of their paycheck every 2 weeks.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't say high taxes stimuluates economic growth. I said cutting taxes does very little to stimuluates growth. There are much more effective ways to boost growth.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for. Clinton's job growth was just as good. Both Bush presidents had pathetic job growth in comparison to Obama.

ND's growth has to do with the energy industry as well. Obviously that has always been the case for that industry. Cutting taxes, again, is not why Texas and ND have strong growth. Tell me how do you explain California's job growth? Taxes aren't low there.

Uh, care to compare the economic growth under Reagan compared to Carter?

My 45 years living on this planet and my college education in this area give me the expertise to say you are full of shit claiming higher taxes stimulates growth.

North Dakota is growing faster than New York because of fossil fuel exploration which is banned in NY and because of lower taxes for companies and people....shut the fuck up, asswipe.

You're a cock-sucking piece of shit on the internet spewing the bullshit preached to you on the Comedy Channel.

The US economy will slowly recover no matter who is POTUS because it is large and there are checks and balances that prevent Obama from destroying everything he wants to destroy (Congress and the Courts stop him).

His policies have made any growth slower and has put some sectors and companies out of business for good.

The bitch running for the US Senate in Kentucky was caught on video telling her supporters she is going to take down the coal industry, then she goes out in public talking about defending coal from Obama. That is pretty much the proof you idiots are more interested in destroying the US economy than fixing it.

Lol you can't talk about anecdotal stories of fracking and expect that to be evidence of anything. Statistics is what matters. You are also a hypocrite. You claim the poor job growth in Texas during Bush has nothing to with Bush yet you blame Obama for slow recovery now. You are pathetic.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for.

He cut the top rate from 70% to 28%.
Job growth was great.
Is that yourproof that tax cuts "do very little to stimulate growth"?

There really isn't any evidence that tax cutting had to do with it. Again, why was job growth under Bush so pathetic?

There is less evidence that cutting taxes hurt job growth.

why was job growth under Bush so pathetic?

He came to office at an employment peak, as the Internet bubble was popping and then his economy was hurt by 9/11.
Between his initial trough and before the housing crash, his job growth wasn't awful.
Unemployment was below 6% in all but 13 months of his 2 terms.
I'd argue his growth would have been better if his tax cuts weren't phased in.

 

[Truman123]

Shitbag....Obama hasn't helped the economy, he has slowed it and even damaged some sectors.

Red states are leading the economic surge despite Obama's attacks on fossil fuel companies and other non-liberal companies.

More people are out of work under Obama than in our entire history.

Most jobs created today are part-time because companies can't afford to provide FTE healthcare any more thanks to Obamacare.

Stupid fuck scum like you come here to show off your stupidity.

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

Republican Lie Dies as the Obama Economy Hits 48 Straight Months of Job Growth

What's your go-to website for news?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps becuase hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

True but why does it still have a higher tax rate than Texas?

dear, there are many many factors involved. Ireland has low taxes but that does not make it richest

Well my overall point is that there no evidence that cutting taxes for the wealthy significantly stimuluates job growth.

dear, the wealthy create jobs with money the more you steal from them the less they can do.

 

[Kosh]

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof. 1.1 million jobs in JOB GROWTH is all Bush has to show for.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

CBO Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today FDL News Desk

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update

Sam Brownback s failed experiment puts state on path to penury - The Washington Post

Keep up the lies, they really make you look bad.

I gave you facts from non partisan sources. They aren't lies. Grow up.

Using known far left sources then clalling them "non partisan sources" really does not help your case.

 

[Billy000]

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

perhaps becuase hollywood and silicon valley are there plus they have great weather and are on a beautiful coast!! Imagie how well they being doing with a favorable tax climate.

True but why does it still have a higher tax rate than Texas?

dear, there are many many factors involved. Ireland has low taxes but that does not make it richest

Well my overall point is that there no evidence that cutting taxes for the wealthy significantly stimuluates job growth.

dear, the wealthy create jobs with money the more you steal from them the less they can do.

No the facts nowadays shows that the wealthy are hoarding most of their money. They are investing less and less. That is why cutting their taxes does little to stimulate growth.

Oh, and collecting taxes isn't theft. Revenue pays the government's expenses. Less revenue means more borrowing which means more debt. What the fuck do you think pays for our military and public schools?

 

[Billy000]

...economic stimulator, where is your proof that any rightwing economic stimulator is effective? When will you just admit you have been wrong all along?

Bush's pathetic job growth and the recent Kansas experiment is more than enough proof. 1.1 million jobs in JOB GROWTH is all Bush has to show for.

Demand side economic is the heart of Obama's stimulus package. It alone supports close to 3 million private jobs still existing today. A total of 10.3 million jobs were created since Obama came to office.

CBO Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today FDL News Desk

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update

Sam Brownback s failed experiment puts state on path to penury - The Washington Post

Keep up the lies, they really make you look bad.

I gave you facts from non partisan sources. They aren't lies. Grow up.

Using known far left sources then clalling them "non partisan sources" really does not help your case.

You: "the far left derp derp derp"

Do you have anything to offer this thread besides vague rants about the far left? You don't even know what the difference between the far left and the moderates is.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No the facts nowadays shows that the wealthy are hoarding most of their money.

100% idiotic of course. they don't hoard their money they put it in the bank to earn intererst through investments the bank makes. The banks don't invenst much either because we have an anti business communist president who is disruptive to economic common sense.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't say high taxes stimuluates economic growth. I said cutting taxes does very little to stimuluates growth. There are much more effective ways to boost growth.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for. Clinton's job growth was just as good. Both Bush presidents had pathetic job growth in comparison to Obama.

ND's growth has to do with the energy industry as well. Obviously that has always been the case for that industry. Cutting taxes, again, is not why Texas and ND have strong growth. Tell me how do you explain California's job growth? Taxes aren't low there.

Uh, care to compare the economic growth under Reagan compared to Carter?

My 45 years living on this planet and my college education in this area give me the expertise to say you are full of shit claiming higher taxes stimulates growth.

North Dakota is growing faster than New York because of fossil fuel exploration which is banned in NY and because of lower taxes for companies and people....shut the fuck up, asswipe.

You're a cock-sucking piece of shit on the internet spewing the bullshit preached to you on the Comedy Channel.

The US economy will slowly recover no matter who is POTUS because it is large and there are checks and balances that prevent Obama from destroying everything he wants to destroy (Congress and the Courts stop him).

His policies have made any growth slower and has put some sectors and companies out of business for good.

The bitch running for the US Senate in Kentucky was caught on video telling her supporters she is going to take down the coal industry, then she goes out in public talking about defending coal from Obama. That is pretty much the proof you idiots are more interested in destroying the US economy than fixing it.

Lol you can't talk about anecdotal stories of fracking and expect that to be evidence of anything. Statistics is what matters. You are also a hypocrite. You claim the poor job growth in Texas during Bush has nothing to with Bush yet you blame Obama for slow recovery now. You are pathetic.

Job growth under Reagan was good, but that's all you republicans have to show for.

He cut the top rate from 70% to 28%.
Job growth was great.
Is that yourproof that tax cuts "do very little to stimulate growth"?

There really isn't any evidence that tax cutting had to do with it. Again, why was job growth under Bush so pathetic? Why did the Kansas experiment fail? Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes? It does better than Texas.

Why did the Kansas experiment fail?

What experiment? Why do you think it failed?

Why is California's economy booming with its higher taxes?

Booming? Is it really, except for Silicon Valley?

It does better than Texas.

It certainly has a larger fiscal hole than Texas.