Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...which begs the question of why Democrats opposed fracking and US oil independence rather than a continued dependence on oil from nations who have been anything other than our 'ally' at times.....You've got a point. Those damned Saudi's really have us over an oil barrel, don't they?
ACTUALLY...In reality, we'll never know if any of our friends in the Royal Family were involved. I believe it was Bush who let that snake slither away, not Obama.
it wasn't the point of the thread. You asked, I answered. the issue was with how obammy handled the saudi's when americans wished to sue them for what bin laden did. and you, as usual, backed the saudi's too.Bin Laden.Which Crown Prince ordered 9-11?
In reality, we'll never know if any of our friends in the Royal Family were involved. I believe it was Bush who let that snake slither away, not Obama.
....WHY WEREN'T THEY THIS PISSED WITH OBAMA FOR STANDING WITH SAUDI, PROTECTING THEM, INSTEAD OF STANDING WITH THE VICTIMS OF 9/11/2001 WHEN A SAUDI CONNECTION TO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS THAT KILLED 3,000 AMERICANS WAS EXPOSED?
I love it when snowflakes get introduced to their own ignorance and have to come face to face with the fact that they are only accusing others of what the Democrats have already done....
Obama, in an awkward twist, becomes Saudi Arabia's defender
"President Barack Obama has never had a great relationship with Saudi Arabia.
Now, he’s the last man standing between the wealthy desert kingdom and billions of dollars in potential liabilities.
Obama has cast the Saudis as "so-called" allies; bemoaned the terrorist-inspiring version of Islam they practice; and even suggested the oil-rich Arab state learn to "share" the Middle East with rival Iran.
The Saudis, meanwhile, consider Obama naive, sparring with him over the Iran nuclear deal and questioning his hands-off approach to Syria’s bloody civil war.
Despite these differences, Obama has promised to veto a bill that Congress passed unanimously allowing families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia over alleged links to the 2001 terrorist attacks."
Obama, in an awkward twist, becomes Saudi Arabia's defender
One man gets killed by the Saudis and snowflakes want to punish them to the max and tar and feather Trump for sticking with them.....but snowflakes have no problem with the fact that 3,000 Americans were murdered with help from the Saudis and Obama defends them, sticking up for the Saudis instead of standing with the American victims / victims' families of 9/11/2001.
Damn, exposed hypocrisy and selective partisan outrage is a [email protected] you are the one being exposed as being the hypocrite and engaging in selective partisan outrage!
Oh, so as long as a Crown Prince did not order the Saudis assistance in helping murder 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 Obama was perfectly correct in standing up and protecting Saudi from the nasty, greedy victims of the terrorist attack that killed 3,000 Americans?Which Crown Prince ordered 9-11?
Are you REALLY attempting to justify Obama protecting Saudi after the murder of 3,000 Americans but condemning Trump for standing with them after the death of a single person?
Bwuhahahaha........
With each new thread you prove there is little difference between Trump and Obama.
No, you deflected / attempted to re-direct the conversation away from the fact that butt-hurt snowflakes who have still not accepted the outcome of the 2016 election have once again become TRIGGERED by something President Trump has done that Barry has already done, far surpassing the scale of Trump's act.it wasn't the point of the thread. You asked, I answered. the issue was with how obammy handled the saudi's when americans wished to sue them for what bin laden did. and you, as usual, backed the saudi's too.Bin Laden.Which Crown Prince ordered 9-11?
In reality, we'll never know if any of our friends in the Royal Family were involved. I believe it was Bush who let that snake slither away, not Obama.
Bin Laden.Which Crown Prince ordered 9-11?
He stepped right into that
Ya think Bin Laden was thinking about how faithful Obama was when he felt that bullet going into his forehead?No, you deflected / attempted to re-direct the conversation away from the fact that butt-hurt snowflakes who have still not accepted the outcome of the 2016 election have once again become TRIGGERED by something President Trump has done that Barry has already done, far surpassing the scale of Trump's act.it wasn't the point of the thread. You asked, I answered. the issue was with how obammy handled the saudi's when americans wished to sue them for what bin laden did. and you, as usual, backed the saudi's too.Bin Laden.Which Crown Prince ordered 9-11?
In reality, we'll never know if any of our friends in the Royal Family were involved. I believe it was Bush who let that snake slither away, not Obama.
Snowflakes are feigning faux outrage over President Trump standing with the Saudis after one murder while Barry protected Saudi from financial accountability for their part in murdering 3,000 Americans.
It is only natural, in case like this, for snowflakes to attempt to lie, deny, justify, and distract from their public shaming after being caught In such a great display of hypocritical selective political outrage.
This is also a -2-For-1' special: This discussion not only points out the hypocrisy of the Left / Snowflakes but adds to Obama's 'Legacy', reminding people how Obama remained faithful to, aided, abetted, armed, financed, trained, etc...terrorists / those who murdered Americans as President.
1 Death versus the death of 3,000 Americans....no difference at all.Sometime GG makes sense. Unfortunately this wasn't one of thoseWith each new thread you prove there is little difference between Trump and Obama.
I would love to embarrass you on this issue further...in another thread, but...Who ordered the incursion into Pakistan that killed Osama?
I would love to embarrass you on this issue further...in another thread, but...Who ordered the incursion into Pakistan that killed Osama?
The question is why are butt-hurt liberals engaging in faux outrage over President Trump deciding not to harshly punish Saudi over the death of 1 person yet had no problem with Barry defending Saudi and protected them from financial accountability over their participation in helping to murder 3,000 Americans...
Okay.....WHY WEREN'T THEY THIS PISSED WITH OBAMA FOR STANDING WITH SAUDI, PROTECTING THEM, INSTEAD OF STANDING WITH THE VICTIMS OF 9/11/2001 WHEN A SAUDI CONNECTION TO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS THAT KILLED 3,000 AMERICANS WAS EXPOSED?
