Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
------------------------------------ EXCELLENT , thankyou , As i have often said , there is no difference between illegal and illegal imported people into the USA . USA has a population of 310 million in 2010 plus millions of illegals and both legal and illegal being third worlders . Its good to get rid of as many as can be gotten rid of CoyoteWhat a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
What is wrong with helping them get back on their feet?Yes immigrate to live on our dole.
Any financial setback get you deported
What a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
You do realize that this country can only support so many non workers. Right? It is sad for them, but I would like my daughter to grow up in a country that has the resources to support HER!
Many have good jobs and families so your response is bullshit.What a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
Why do they completely rely on welfare why don't they have jobs and pay for themselves? Are they just lazy and expect American taxpayers to fund them and their family?
No one is contributing less than Ivanka and Melania.Is it? What will the total cost of such decisions be?If they are not contributing to America's economy, which they are not as they are all on welfare then they are draining your welfare system funded by taxpayers money, so from an economic viewpoint removing them would SAVE you money that you could put to a better more worthy use.
Agreed. From a strictly economic standpoint it's a good decision.
If you don't pay federal income taxes you are a drag on our government expenses. I want more people that can contribute, not more that need help. We're better off with fewer uneducated people that rely on welfare.
Do you know what legal immigrants are?Only citizens of the US should receive welfare.
----------------------------------- and don't forget me , i also applaud the TRUMPS actions . Clean up the USA and make it Great Again seems to be TRUMPS Goal Reasonable .Many have good jobs and families so your response is bullshit.What a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
Why do they completely rely on welfare why don't they have jobs and pay for themselves? Are they just lazy and expect American taxpayers to fund them and their family?
First your liar in Chief said he was only going after illegal immigrants that are violent.
Then the liar said he would go after anyone not a citizen.
Now the liar is going after LEGAL immigrants.
While you applaud him.
No one is contributing less than Ivanka and Melania.Is it? What will the total cost of such decisions be?If they are not contributing to America's economy, which they are not as they are all on welfare then they are draining your welfare system funded by taxpayers money, so from an economic viewpoint removing them would SAVE you money that you could put to a better more worthy use.
Agreed. From a strictly economic standpoint it's a good decision.
If you don't pay federal income taxes you are a drag on our government expenses. I want more people that can contribute, not more that need help. We're better off with fewer uneducated people that rely on welfare.
Should we get rid of them too?
Oh right..They’re not brown skinned.
They aren’t citizens. If they were citizens he could not deport them.Do you know what legal immigrants are?Only citizens of the US should receive welfare.
This is another nail in the coffin of the GOP because they refuse to do their jobs and hold this madman accountable.What a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
----------------------This is another nail in the coffin of the GOP because they refuse to do their jobs and hold this madman accountable.What a piece of trash he is.
Proposed Trump rule change could put millions of legal immigrants at risk of deportation
Currently, immigrants who rely on, or are expected to rely on, the government for more than half of their income are considered “public charges” and can be banned from entering the country or deported, even if they’re otherwise eligible for extended residency.
Immigrants who rely completely on welfare programs or long-term Medicaid benefits are typically considered public charges, but the Trump administration wants to extend those guidelines to include immigrants who use public housing, subsidies to help pay for health insurance, food stamps, income tax credits, the Children's Health Insurance Program and non-emergency uses of Medicaid, according to a White House draft obtained by The Washington Post.
A recent study by The New England Journal of Medicine found that the changes “could have important consequences for access to medical care and the health of millions of immigrants and their families.” An estimated 1 million noncitizens would lose their insurance, the study found.
This will all change in January when the Dems take over the House.
----------------------------------------- not just about money , only whores will do anything for money . ------ just a comment Confounding .No one is contributing less than Ivanka and Melania.Is it? What will the total cost of such decisions be?If they are not contributing to America's economy, which they are not as they are all on welfare then they are draining your welfare system funded by taxpayers money, so from an economic viewpoint removing them would SAVE you money that you could put to a better more worthy use.
Agreed. From a strictly economic standpoint it's a good decision.
If you don't pay federal income taxes you are a drag on our government expenses. I want more people that can contribute, not more that need help. We're better off with fewer uneducated people that rely on welfare.
Should we get rid of them too?
Oh right..They’re not brown skinned.
Trump and his family no doubt pay a good amount in taxes. This is a bad argument.
You don't know that. We've never seen them.No one is contributing less than Ivanka and Melania.Is it? What will the total cost of such decisions be?If they are not contributing to America's economy, which they are not as they are all on welfare then they are draining your welfare system funded by taxpayers money, so from an economic viewpoint removing them would SAVE you money that you could put to a better more worthy use.
Agreed. From a strictly economic standpoint it's a good decision.
If you don't pay federal income taxes you are a drag on our government expenses. I want more people that can contribute, not more that need help. We're better off with fewer uneducated people that rely on welfare.
Should we get rid of them too?
Oh right..They’re not brown skinned.
Trump and his family no doubt pay a good amount in taxes. This is a bad argument.
Are you a nonreader like the president?They aren’t citizens. If they were citizens he could not deport them.Do you know what legal immigrants are?Only citizens of the US should receive welfare.
At one point there was no welfare, and in America at the beginning of the 20th Century when MILLIONS who had NOTHING on my Continent sailed to America, they lived in tiny buildings in New York City and they often had big amounts of children and the adults in the family worked two, three sometimes four jobs to pay for their family and also to save some moneys so they could get the family into a larger building and hopefully open a restaurant or an Import business for olive oil or fruits etc
These peoples had NO welfare to rely on, they either worked or they starved and the MAJORITY worked and were able from hardwork to get a better situation for them and their family. These were America's first big big amount of Immigrants from my Continent.
Now America ONLY has Immigrants from the Third World, who go to America with next to ZERO and expect American taxpayers to PAY for them and their family via a variety of welfare programmes. Disgusting.
Memo to America: STOP the welfare. Period.
You don't know that. We've never seen them.No one is contributing less than Ivanka and Melania.Is it? What will the total cost of such decisions be?Agreed. From a strictly economic standpoint it's a good decision.
If you don't pay federal income taxes you are a drag on our government expenses. I want more people that can contribute, not more that need help. We're better off with fewer uneducated people that rely on welfare.
Should we get rid of them too?
Oh right..They’re not brown skinned.
Trump and his family no doubt pay a good amount in taxes. This is a bad argument.
On the other hand he has had quite a few bankruptcies.
