So, what tactics will the Democrats use to destroy the Benghazi whistleblowers?

[Little-Acorn]

So, what tactics will the Democrats use to destroy the Benghazi whistleblowers?

Will it be discovered that one of them has had an extramarital affair? Claimed by a woman he knew casually, and who shortly afterward disappears with no attempt to prove anything she said? Surely that means that what the man says in Congress, must be a lie.

Will we soon learn that another one didn't pay his taxes? A sure sign of a liar-before-Congress there.

How long before we learn that someone's daughter had a baby out of wedlock? How could we possibly believe a man's testimony about foreign attacks, whose daughter did that?

Which one(s) of them used to run a business, for which he did not have all the right permits and permissions?

What are the chances that an army of lawyers is digging into the backgrounds of each one of these whistleblowers, right now? (If the consulate in Benghazi had had the kind of attention and manpower now being devoted to investigating the people who might tell the truth, what chances that the attack would never have happened in the first place?)

How likely is it that the Democrats have already written up long lists of charges and accusations against these people who will soon appear before Congress? And are only waiting to decide which name to put on which list, before releasing them publicly?

Time to take a pool. What other accusation(s) will be levelled against the people who will testify before Congress, on the Benghazi terrorist attacks?

[bueller]

....anybody?

....anybody?

[/bueller]

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh I'm sure there will be many.
But I would have to ask....Why the hell did you put them in such an important position if they were such horrible people?
Just more incompetence I guess.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Which one will be found to have a drug habit?

Which will be found to have been denied a promotion, sometime in his career? Oops, instant "disgruntled employee seeking revenge". No support or proof needed.

 

[g5000]

Perhaps they will borrow the tactics of the yellow journalists and their piss drinkers who have been manufacturing bullshit by the metric ton since the attack.

"Obama watched as they died".

"Seven hour battle at the consulate".

"No rescue sent".

"Stand down order".

"Benghazi survivors".


All lies. So I would go talk to these guys. They are the experts.

 

[Katzndogz]

It's already started. They aren't credible, meaning they are lying.

State Dept. Won?t Say Its Own Officials Set to Testify on Benghazi Are 'Credible People' | CNS News

How long before Gloria Allred and her bimbo army show up?

 

[g5000]

It's already started. They aren't credible, meaning they are lying.

State Dept. Won?t Say Its Own Officials Set to Testify on Benghazi Are 'Credible People' | CNS News

How long before Gloria Allred and her bimbo army show up?

The only one lying here is you. The State Department spokesman did not say, "They aren't credible".

Try again.

This lying shit just comes naturally to you rubes, doesn't it.

 

[LoneLaugher]

The OP is living happily in make believe land. If he repeats those options a few hundred times, some of his dummy pals will swear that they actually happened.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Perhaps they will borrow the tactics of the yellow journalists and their piss drinkers who have been manufacturing bullshit by the metric ton since the attack.

"Obama watched as they died".

"Seven hour battle at the consulate".

"No rescue sent".

"Stand down order".

"Benghazi survivors".


All lies. So I would go talk to these guys. They are the experts.

All lies?

WHO the fuck gave YOU trhe inside scoop?

Answer: nobody.

You may have HEARD contrary reports, but that doesn't constitute proof.

There IS evidence that there were at least two STAND DOWN ORDERS.

<font color="red">CIA ORDERED TO STAND DOWN DURING BENGHAZI ATTACK;<br>US SEALs KILLED IN ATTACK DISOBEYED ORDERS IN HEROIC EFFORT TO SAVE STEVENS & SMITH</font>

That YOU may not believe that account is NOT the same thing as the account being "lies."

Get a fuckin' grip little boy.

 

[francoHFW]

OP-facts, history, and logic? Who have Dems character assassinated with BS again? Like Fluke, Soros, Obama, Foster, Clintons, Kennedys, Holder- well, everybody lol...The Pub Propaganda Machine is a lying, hateful disgrace, dupes.

 

[francoHFW]

#8- Yup only confirmed liars Issa and Pub propagandists KNOW the attackers motives (20+ other attacks earlier WERE about the video...)and know more than the CIA and the gov't. Conspiracy dolts.

See- ATF agent in charge of gunwalking said NEITHER bush nor Obama administations knew about it- Just another example of the Bushies being incompetent administrators...

Facts don't stop the RW conspiracy/Party first and always from going on and on and on and on...

 

[Little-Acorn]

Some of the tactics used on other people who have complained about the effects of various Obama policies, and/or pointed out how those policies are making things worse for Americans, include:

...one anonymous State Department official told Fox News reporter James Rosen that Hicks and Thompson have "axes to grind."

Gee, who wouldn't have an "axe to grind" if your bosses lied to you, blocked you from saving your co-workers and friends, and lied shamelessly and repeatedly to the American public about the reasons for their deaths?

It's this corrupt and vengeful White House that wields the sharpest axes and biggest grindstones. The casualty count in Obama's war on whistleblowers is double-digit.

ATF insiders who testified before Congress about Obama's Fast and Furious gun-running nightmare faced systemic retaliation and harassment -- both from government supervisors who openly declared witch hunts against them and from liberal media water-carriers.

Maverick journalist Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News faced White House retaliation of her own over her Fast and Furious investigations. Department of Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler "was just yelling at me," and White House spokesman Eric Schultz "literally screamed at me and cussed at me," she told radio talk show host Laura Ingraham in 2011.

Former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams, who blew the whistle on Attorney General Eric Holder's rule of law-perverting, race-baiting reign, was basely smeared as a "liar" and perjurer by DOJ proxy and Washington Post tool E.J. Dionne -- who ignored Adams' stellar career record at DOJ and unassailable sworn testimony.

Gerald Walpin, former AmeriCorps inspector general, was pushed out of his job by the Obamas after exposing fraud and corruption perpetrated by Democratic mayor of Sacramento and Obama friend Kevin Johnson. The White House baselessly questioned the veteran watchdog's mental health and never apologized for slandering him.

The Pleasanton (CA) Weekly was bullied by the White House press shop over a benign article that irked the administration because it made Michelle Obama look snooty. The San Francisco Chronicle was punished by the White House because a print pool reporter used a cellphone to record video of protesters at an Obama Bay Area fundraiser.

And in case you needed reminding: Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius threatened to crack down on health insurers for candidly tying Obamacare mandates to rising premiums -- something that Sebelius herself now acknowledges. Team Obama lambasted other whistle-blowing companies such as Deere, Caterpillar, Verizon and ATT for speaking out about the cost implications and financial burdens of Obamacare -- and then cheered from the sidelines while Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman attempted to haul the firms up for a congressional inquisition.

(from Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers | RealClearPolitics )


Will the Obamanites use these same well-proven tactics for smearing or intimidating the people testifying in Congress now?

Or will they come up with any brand new ones?

 

[deltex1]

So, what tactics will the Democrats use to destroy the Benghazi whistleblowers?

Will it be discovered that one of them has had an extramarital affair? Claimed by a woman he knew casually, and who shortly afterward disappears with no attempt to prove anything she said? Surely that means that what the man says in Congress, must be a lie.

Will we soon learn that another one didn't pay his taxes? A sure sign of a liar-before-Congress there.

How long before we learn that someone's daughter had a baby out of wedlock? How could we possibly believe a man's testimony about foreign attacks, whose daughter did that?

Which one(s) of them used to run a business, for which he did not have all the right permits and permissions?

What are the chances that an army of lawyers is digging into the backgrounds of each one of these whistleblowers, right now? (If the consulate in Benghazi had had the kind of attention and manpower now being devoted to investigating the people who might tell the truth, what chances that the attack would never have happened in the first place?)

How likely is it that the Democrats have already written up long lists of charges and accusations against these people who will soon appear before Congress? And are only waiting to decide which name to put on which list, before releasing them publicly?

Time to take a pool. What other accusation(s) will be levelled against the people who will testify before Congress, on the Benghazi terrorist attacks?

[bueller]

....anybody?

....anybody?

[/bueller]

Based on the pathetic showing so far by the whistle blowers...Obabble wins.

 

[deltex1]

After al this time how can you show up quivering?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I'll be waiting for all the "prostitutes" to surface to ensure their lives turn to shit

 

[OriginalShroom]

It's already started. They aren't credible, meaning they are lying.

State Dept. Won?t Say Its Own Officials Set to Testify on Benghazi Are 'Credible People' | CNS News

How long before Gloria Allred and her bimbo army show up?

The only one lying here is you. The State Department spokesman did not say, "They aren't credible".

Try again.

This lying shit just comes naturally to you rubes, doesn't it.

Talk about being a liar..

You are lying about what was posted and what you quoted.

Tell me something, did you have to practice to become such a liar or does it come naturally to you?

 

[jwoodie]

LOL, the Libtards already have their talking points lined up even before hearing the testimony. Nice.

 

[bodecea]

So...these "whistleblowers" you speak of. How were they destroyed?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

The same tactics they use to get most people to believe that gun violence is on the rise and we need to "do" something about it. It's called lying.

 

[Claudette]

Perhaps they will borrow the tactics of the yellow journalists and their piss drinkers who have been manufacturing bullshit by the metric ton since the attack.

"Obama watched as they died".

"Seven hour battle at the consulate".

"No rescue sent".

"Stand down order".

"Benghazi survivors".


All lies. So I would go talk to these guys. They are the experts.

All lies?

WHO the fuck gave YOU trhe inside scoop?

Answer: nobody.

You may have HEARD contrary reports, but that doesn't constitute proof.

There IS evidence that there were at least two STAND DOWN ORDERS.

<font color="red">CIA ORDERED TO STAND DOWN DURING BENGHAZI ATTACK;<br>US SEALs KILLED IN ATTACK DISOBEYED ORDERS IN HEROIC EFFORT TO SAVE STEVENS & SMITH</font>

That YOU may not believe that account is NOT the same thing as the account being "lies."

Get a fuckin' grip little boy.

Yes G seems to think his account is the only accurate one out there. Where he gets his info is an unknown but where ever it comes from its the true account.

Everyone else is a piss drinker or is lying or just a biased Rep idiot.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So...these "whistleblowers" you speak of. How were they destroyed?

Gregory Hicks was demoted. Of course this was after obama and hilary raved about what a fantastic job he had done in the Benghazi attack.
Wonder what made them do a 180?

Here's comes the part where the dems throw their own intellect under the bus and act stupid to protect the messiah.