There is room for debate on the military since it is the government, or people via elected officials that determine the amounts spent on military hardware and expenses. That could be interpreted as social ownership of the means of production as does all programs that would not exist but for a decision by the public to create something that otherwise would or could not exist. The "would or could" aspect offers the most fertile grounds for debate.So we hear so many Americans claim they hate socialism and don't think Bernie Sanders would have a chance to win if he were selected as the Democratic candidate. I wonder how many truly understand socialism and are even enjoying socialism without even realizing it.
The one that really surprises me is the military......conservatives claim they love the military and don't mind the bulk of our tax-payer money going toward maintaining it....the military, it's the closest to socialism of the many programs we support.
The single consistent trait of all formulations of socialism is social ownership of the means of production. If you think the military is socialism, you need to count yourself first in your tally of those who don't understand socialism.