Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Anyone using twatter and farsebook to claim Trump will win by a landslide, well then those people are retarded.

Why?

Anyone can join twatter and farsebook and troll accounts and even minors can hit like, so let be factual about this, but you will proclaim victory will be Trump and after he loses you will then proclaim everyone is either stupid or hate America for not voting for someone that is more Liberal than Clinton!

 

[Vigilante]

Trump is still whining about the baby story...
So he may not be up to speed on the news that he's running away with the election......

Someone might want to fill him in on that....

I guess this gives Trumpy cover when he blows off the debates with HRC.....
What's the point he will say.

Another MSM Lie: Trump DID NOT kick baby out - Mom's Letter - NEWSL
newsl.org › Elections
2 days ago - The mother of a crying baby at a Donald Trump rally in Ashburn, Virginia, is speaking out after she says the mainstream media completely ..

 

[Vigilante]

Anyone using twatter and farsebook to claim Trump will win by a landslide, well then those people are retarded.

Why?

Anyone can join twatter and farsebook and troll accounts and even minors can hit like, so let be factual about this, but you will proclaim victory will be Trump and after he loses you will then proclaim everyone is either stupid or hate America for not voting for someone that is more Liberal than Clinton!

Coming from a retarded, fucktard, leftist, scumbag, how could anyone NOT believe you!

 

[konradv]

Gateway Pundit ^ | Aug 7th, 2016 | Jim Hoft
Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is.

So the polls are wrong. The race really isn't that tight? That's what that sentence says. I think y'all got it wrong. Gateway Pundit is saying Lyin' Don is dead meat.

They do?

Current polls are showing that the race is tighter than it really is, i.e. Hillary's lead is bigger than the polls are showing. English much?!?!

 

[HappyJoy]

538 says so. But if you favor lying asshole Gateway Pundit over MSM because he makes your fee-fees tingly that's fine. You're just fooling yourself.

Nate Silver has been right ONCE during this election cycle.... BUT the left swears by him!

Prove it.

One day after the RNC he had Trump up 57+%....YOU look it up!

How is that wrong? Prove it.

Nate Silver: Trump Has 57 Percent Chance of Winning If Election Held Today - Breitbart

Yes, I'm well aware that the polls and thus 538s election models showed Trump with an edge shortly after the RNC convention. I asked how is it that 538 was wrong?

Are you saying Trump didn't get a bounce in the polls?

Are you saying you don't know what 538? Even though you yourself have used them as a source. You are a person of low character.

 

[Toro]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

 

[konradv]

Nate Silver: Trump Has 57 Percent Chance of Winning If Election Held Today - Breitbart

Get your info from the horse's mouth, not some site with an ulterior motive. Hillary- 91.7%, Trump- 8.2%

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

 

[Vigilante]

Gateway Pundit ^ | Aug 7th, 2016 | Jim Hoft
Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is.

So the polls are wrong. The race really isn't that tight? That's what that sentence says. I think y'all got it wrong. Gateway Pundit is saying Lyin' Don is dead meat.

They do?

Current polls are showing that the race is tighter than it really is, i.e. Hillary's lead is bigger than the polls are showing. English much?!?!

Yes, all the demographics of the leading polls OUT WEIGHT DemoRATS to Republicans in a biased way..... Now don't cry Korad, we'll still met you make a fool of yourself under President Trump!

 

[Toro]

Nate Silver: Trump Has 57 Percent Chance of Winning If Election Held Today - Breitbart

Get your info from the horse's mouth, not some site with an ulterior agenda.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

lol

 

[my2¢]

Hopefully will get some excitement on election night.

​

 

[Vigilante]

Nate Silver has been right ONCE during this election cycle.... BUT the left swears by him!

Prove it.

One day after the RNC he had Trump up 57+%....YOU look it up!

How is that wrong? Prove it.

Nate Silver: Trump Has 57 Percent Chance of Winning If Election Held Today - Breitbart

Yes, I'm well aware that the polls and thus 538s election models showed Trump with an edge shortly after the RNC convention. I asked how is it that 538 was wrong?

Are you saying Trump didn't get a bounce in the polls?

Are you saying you don't know what 538? Even though you yourself have used them as a source. You are a person of low character.

Please troll try to annoy someone that gives a shit about what you say!

 

[Toro]

Gateway Pundit ^ | Aug 7th, 2016 | Jim Hoft
Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is.

So the polls are wrong. The race really isn't that tight? That's what that sentence says. I think y'all got it wrong. Gateway Pundit is saying Lyin' Don is dead meat.

They do?

Current polls are showing that the race is tighter than it really is, i.e. Hillary's lead is bigger than the polls are showing. English much?!?!

Yes, all the demographics of the leading polls OUT WEIGHT DemoRATS to Republicans in a biased way..... Now don't cry Korad, we'll still met you make a fool of yourself under President Trump!

skewedpolls2016.com

lol

 

[RodISHI]

 

[Vigilante]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

View attachment 84648

Yes, you notice that the LV difference is slight compared to the RV which all have skewed demographics...but keep trying...I noticed you were absent when Trump was leading!

 

[Vigilante]

• Clinton vs. Trump? No, It’s the Media vs. America
  The New American ^ | 05 August 2016 | Selwyn Duke
  Liberal media bias has long been an open secret. But now it’s so bad that even a liberal mainstream newspaper notes that, in an effort to destroy Donald Trump, the media have jumped the shark.In a Los Angeles Times piece, columnist Justin Raimondo writes that to “fight Trump, journalists have dispensed with objectivity”; he then asks, “Why are the rules of journalism being rewritten this election year?” He also theorizes that the pro-Hillary Clinton bias has become so blatant it may actually backfire on the media.As his first example, Raimondo cites how the media present out of context Trump’s statement...

 

[HappyJoy]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

View attachment 84648

Yes, you notice that the LV difference is slight compared to the RV which all have skewed demographics...but keep trying...I noticed you were absent when Trump was leading!

Can you point to what you are talking about? That image doesn't cover RV vs LV. So, I don't know, why don't you come up with a single fact today.

They all show a Clinton lead and it's Trump who needs unlikely voters, he's depending on them.

 

[Toro]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

View attachment 84648

Yes, you notice that the LV difference is slight compared to the RV which all have skewed demographics...but keep trying...I noticed you were absent when Trump was leading!

Vag, I told you Clinton would bounce back after the conventions.

Of course, I didn't think Trump would suck so bad that people would think he's a Democrat plant!

 

[Vigilante]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

View attachment 84648

Yes, you notice that the LV difference is slight compared to the RV which all have skewed demographics...but keep trying...I noticed you were absent when Trump was leading!

Can you point to what you are talking about? That image doesn't cover RV vs LV. So, I don't know, why don't you come up with a single fact today.

This is why I dislike debating you...you're a fucking moron that can't read a chart!

 

[Vigilante]

lol

Vagifail doing his thing

View attachment 84648

Yes, you notice that the LV difference is slight compared to the RV which all have skewed demographics...but keep trying...I noticed you were absent when Trump was leading!

Vag, I told you Clinton would bounce back after the conventions.

Of course, I didn't think Trump would suck so bad that people would think he's a Democrat plant!

Hmmmm.....

DNC Insider: Clinton Being Pounded in Polls – Don’t Believe Mainstream Media!

 

[Dale Smith]

Gateway Pundit ^ | Aug 7th, 2016 | Jim Hoft
Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is.

So the polls are wrong. The race really isn't that tight? That's what that sentence says. I think y'all got it wrong. Gateway Pundit is saying Lyin' Don is dead meat.

They do?

Current polls are showing that the race is tighter than it really is, i.e. Hillary's lead is bigger than the polls are showing. English much?!?!

While I know that most of your musings are shit-filled , I feel pretty confident in saying that the fix is in for Hitlery and it will not be because the majority voted for the lying, globalist POS but because the electronic voting machines are easily compromised. I have yet to see one Hitlery Clinton bumper sticker but I have seen plenty of bumpers stickers touting Trump. She didn't draw well at rallies and she has managed to piss off Sanders supporters. She will when because the power elites promised her the CEO job of USA.INC but she is easily the most unlikable candidate in a very long time. The heat is going to be turned up very high against her if we even have an election. There is so much more crimes to reveal about this unashamed crook. More and moire people are turning to alternative media and that is going to hurt Hitlery in a big time way.