Socialized Medicine Death Sentence

American_Jihad

Flaming Libs/Koranimals
May 1, 2012
11,534
3,717
350
Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
That's what the left want, to bad we can't have two health systems=rupub/demo...

A SOCIALIZED MEDICINE DEATH SENTENCE
The tragic ordeal of Charlie Gard.
June 30, 2017

Lloyd Billingsley
brit.jpg


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against Chris Gard and Connie Yates of the United Kingdom, whose 10-month-old child Charlie Gard will be “allowed to die,” a decision supposedly “in his own best interest,” as a British judge put it. According to a timeline in the Daily Mail, here is how Charlie’s story has played out.

Charlie Gard was born a healthy baby on August 4, 2016, but at eight months the child was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage. Charlie began to lose weight but in January 2017 his mother Connie Yates found an American doctor willing to offer Charlie a trial therapy called nucleoside.

Connie set up a website and succeeded in raising enough money to cover Charlie’s travel to America by air ambulance and the cost of the experimental treatment. But then the British legal system handed Charlie a setback.

On April 3, 2017, a High Court judge questioned whether Connie and Chris should be allowed to take Charlie to America for treatment, and whether doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital should turn off the baby’s life-support system. On April 11, the court ruled that the doctors were in fact permitted to do so.

...

A Socialized Medicine Death Sentence
 
As usual you are barking up the wrong tree. This was a legal decision by a court and certainly not a liberal one. You guys make me laugh, Gorsuch is another idiot juror you praised and what does he dissent? Civil rights for Americans because he is a religious bigot. Get with the reality, conservative choices for courts are a problem for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Two can easily play this game. Rust Belt Philosophy: Conservatives literally want you to die in a fire
 
The point, that you conveniently missed, is socialized medicine makes medical decisions, not on the ability to aid the ill, but on the expense to society to do so. So a liberal judge made a ruling on a liberal law and you say this was not a liberal decision. You probably think it is OK as just another late term abortion.

As far as Gorsuch being another idiot juror, let me remind you of R B Ginsburg, the definition of idiot.
 
As usual you are barking up the wrong tree. This was a legal decision by a court and certainly not a liberal one. You guys make me laugh, Gorsuch is another idiot juror you praised and what does he dissent? Civil rights for Americans because he is a religious bigot. Get with the reality, conservative choices for courts are a problem for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Two can easily play this game. Rust Belt Philosophy: Conservatives literally want you to die in a fire

This is the progressive statist mindset, State > Individual. They get to set a precedent and now they can deny "hopeless" treatments to children in the goal of cost savings.
 
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE'S KILLING ISN'T JUST ABOUT MONEY, BUT POWER
June 30, 2017

Daniel Greenfield
charlie.jpg


While Dems in America vie among themselves to state ever more exaggerated figures of how many Americans will die because of the repeal of ObamaCare, in the UK socialized medicine will once again kill, not because of a lack of care, but because that is how the system works.

...

This is what socialized medicine looks like.

...

As Orwell's O'Brien said, "The purpose of power is power." The purpose of Socialism is power. The purpose of Socialized medicine is power.

And how better to know that power than through death. The system will kill Charlie to know its power. It will kill him to show its power. It will kill him as a warning to others. It will do so with the compassion that tyrannies that are not yet confident enough to show their teeth do. But it will do it nonetheless.

The purpose of power is not compassion. It is power.

Socialized Medicine's Killing Isn't Just About Money, But Power
 
That's what the left want, to bad we can't have two health systems=rupub/demo...

A SOCIALIZED MEDICINE DEATH SENTENCE
The tragic ordeal of Charlie Gard.
June 30, 2017

Lloyd Billingsley
brit.jpg


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against Chris Gard and Connie Yates of the United Kingdom, whose 10-month-old child Charlie Gard will be “allowed to die,” a decision supposedly “in his own best interest,” as a British judge put it. According to a timeline in the Daily Mail, here is how Charlie’s story has played out.

Charlie Gard was born a healthy baby on August 4, 2016, but at eight months the child was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage. Charlie began to lose weight but in January 2017 his mother Connie Yates found an American doctor willing to offer Charlie a trial therapy called nucleoside.

Connie set up a website and succeeded in raising enough money to cover Charlie’s travel to America by air ambulance and the cost of the experimental treatment. But then the British legal system handed Charlie a setback.

On April 3, 2017, a High Court judge questioned whether Connie and Chris should be allowed to take Charlie to America for treatment, and whether doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital should turn off the baby’s life-support system. On April 11, the court ruled that the doctors were in fact permitted to do so.

...

A Socialized Medicine Death Sentence

All other first world countries have socialized medicine in one form or another. But of course we'd have to stop the third worlders from coming here to take advantage of it. A five year moratorium on all immigration and an abrupt stop to the refugee scam run by these churches like catholic charities.
 
That's what the left want, to bad we can't have two health systems=rupub/demo...

A SOCIALIZED MEDICINE DEATH SENTENCE
The tragic ordeal of Charlie Gard.
June 30, 2017

Lloyd Billingsley
brit.jpg


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against Chris Gard and Connie Yates of the United Kingdom, whose 10-month-old child Charlie Gard will be “allowed to die,” a decision supposedly “in his own best interest,” as a British judge put it. According to a timeline in the Daily Mail, here is how Charlie’s story has played out.

Charlie Gard was born a healthy baby on August 4, 2016, but at eight months the child was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage. Charlie began to lose weight but in January 2017 his mother Connie Yates found an American doctor willing to offer Charlie a trial therapy called nucleoside.

Connie set up a website and succeeded in raising enough money to cover Charlie’s travel to America by air ambulance and the cost of the experimental treatment. But then the British legal system handed Charlie a setback.

On April 3, 2017, a High Court judge questioned whether Connie and Chris should be allowed to take Charlie to America for treatment, and whether doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital should turn off the baby’s life-support system. On April 11, the court ruled that the doctors were in fact permitted to do so.

...

A Socialized Medicine Death Sentence

the liberal assholes are like the ones we have here, so far up the Gov. ass they need them to decided everything breathing moment for them, they get off on dictatorship as the same idiots here don't even know what a dictatorship is, they have no idea what Communism is and yet the morons are voting our Country to be like these their pathetic Government. ( Not these parents in particular), sad part is situations like this is what these communist fks want and then it involved everyone government ass kisser or not.
 
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE KILLS
Call it single-payer or Medicare-for-all, socialized medicine is death.
August 3, 2017

Daniel Greenfield
sm.jpg


As the health care debate goes on, Senator Bernie Sanders will toss in a socialized medicine bill.

Bernie’s bill won’t be a realistic piece of legislation. The 1 percenter Socialist from Vermont has three successful bills to his name. Two of those involved renaming post offices. He was a marginal figure during the ObamaCare debate. The financials of the plan won’t work. But they never do.

ObamaCare insurers are losing billions. Aetna pulled out after $700 million in losses. United Health jumped after losing $720 million. The single-payer that Bernie wants to propose will be even worse.

Vermont’s single payer experiment cost $4.3 billion out of a $4.9 billion state budget. The California Senate passed single-payer with no way to cover the $400 billion cost in a $183 billion budget.

Democrats who wouldn’t vote for it faced death threats and accusations that they were “murderers”.

...

Congressman Steven LaTourette came down with pancreatic cancer after OAP doctors failed to notify him that he had a lesion. He died last year.

Socialized medicine really will kill you.

Socialized Medicine Kills
 
That's what the left want, to bad we can't have two health systems=rupub/demo...

A SOCIALIZED MEDICINE DEATH SENTENCE
The tragic ordeal of Charlie Gard.
June 30, 2017

Lloyd Billingsley
brit.jpg


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against Chris Gard and Connie Yates of the United Kingdom, whose 10-month-old child Charlie Gard will be “allowed to die,” a decision supposedly “in his own best interest,” as a British judge put it. According to a timeline in the Daily Mail, here is how Charlie’s story has played out.

Charlie Gard was born a healthy baby on August 4, 2016, but at eight months the child was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage. Charlie began to lose weight but in January 2017 his mother Connie Yates found an American doctor willing to offer Charlie a trial therapy called nucleoside.

Connie set up a website and succeeded in raising enough money to cover Charlie’s travel to America by air ambulance and the cost of the experimental treatment. But then the British legal system handed Charlie a setback.

On April 3, 2017, a High Court judge questioned whether Connie and Chris should be allowed to take Charlie to America for treatment, and whether doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital should turn off the baby’s life-support system. On April 11, the court ruled that the doctors were in fact permitted to do so.

...

A Socialized Medicine Death Sentence
Good boy, repeating the party line.
 
The point, that you conveniently missed, is socialized medicine makes medical decisions, not on the ability to aid the ill, but on the expense to society to do so. So a liberal judge made a ruling on a liberal law and you say this was not a liberal decision. You probably think it is OK as just another late term abortion.

As far as Gorsuch being another idiot juror, let me remind you of R B Ginsburg, the definition of idiot.
Is that why those countries have a better life expectancy than we do?
 
As usual you are barking up the wrong tree. This was a legal decision by a court and certainly not a liberal one. You guys make me laugh, Gorsuch is another idiot juror you praised and what does he dissent? Civil rights for Americans because he is a religious bigot. Get with the reality, conservative choices for courts are a problem for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Two can easily play this game. Rust Belt Philosophy: Conservatives literally want you to die in a fire

So when the courts say your ass should die we all should just vote to have you killed right Mmmk.

You leftist loons miss the entirely wrong reasons this has been done.
 
As usual you are barking up the wrong tree. This was a legal decision by a court and certainly not a liberal one. You guys make me laugh, Gorsuch is another idiot juror you praised and what does he dissent? Civil rights for Americans because he is a religious bigot. Get with the reality, conservative choices for courts are a problem for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Two can easily play this game. Rust Belt Philosophy: Conservatives literally want you to die in a fire

As usual you are barking up the wrong tree. This was a legal decision by a court and certainly not a liberal one. You guys make me laugh, Gorsuch is another idiot juror you praised and what does he dissent? Civil rights for Americans because he is a religious bigot. Get with the reality, conservative choices for courts are a problem for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Two can easily play this game. Rust Belt Philosophy: Conservatives literally want you to die in a fire


So you support being a NAZI , and you will when it comes to the USA too aye. Yep you are an Obama/Clinton/Bill Ayres victim and don't even know it lmfao.

"Euthanasia" Killings

Forced sterilization in Germany was the forerunner of the systematic killing of the mentally ill and the handicapped. In October 1939, Hitler himself initiated a decree which empowered physicians to grant a "mercy death" to "patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgment of their state of health." The intent of the socalled "euthanasia" program, however, was not to relieve the suffering of the chronically ill. The Nazi regime used the term as a euphemism: its aim was to exterminate the mentally ill and the handicapped, thus "cleansing" the "Aryan" race of persons considered genetically defective and a financial burden to society.

The idea of killing the incurably ill was posed well before 1939. In the 1920s, debate on this issue centered on a book coauthored by


Nazi Persecution of the Mentally & Physically Disabled
 
The point, that you conveniently missed, is socialized medicine makes medical decisions, not on the ability to aid the ill, but on the expense to society to do so. So a liberal judge made a ruling on a liberal law and you say this was not a liberal decision. You probably think it is OK as just another late term abortion.

As far as Gorsuch being another idiot juror, let me remind you of R B Ginsburg, the definition of idiot.
Is that why those countries have a better life expectancy than we do?
images


Tell that to Charlie Gard.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about a group of autosomal recessive disorders. For a similarly abbreviated (MdDS) rare neurological condition, see Mal de debarquement.
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome
Synonyms
mtDNA depletion syndrome

Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome is inherited via autosomal recessive manner
Classification and external resources
ICD-10
G71.3
OMIM 603041 609560 251880 203700613662 612073 256810 271245612075 245400 615084 617184615418 615471 616896 617156
Orphanet 35698
[edit on Wikidata]
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome (MDS or MDDS) is any of a group of autosomal recessive disorders that cause a significant drop in mitochondrial DNA in affected tissues. Symptoms can be any combination of myopathic, hepatopathic, or encephalomyopathic.[1] These syndromes affect tissue in the muscle, liver, or both the muscle and brain, respectively. The condition is typically fatal in infancy and early childhood, though some have survived to their teenage years with the myopathic variant and some have survived into adulthood with the SUCLA2 encephalomyopathic variant.[2][3] There is currently no curative treatment for any form of MDDS, though some preliminary treatments have shown a reduction in symptoms.[4]

Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome - Wikipedia

An incurable genetic disease, and you want to blame those who simply stated that it was a waste to put off the inevitable. This is just more ambulance chasing on the part of the crazy 'Conservatives'. These are the same people that were chanting "Let him die" at that Rand rally. They care nothing about the child, except as a talking point.
 
The entire point of experimental medicine is to cure the incurable. As long as the taxpayers aren't paying, the government should have no say.
 
That's what the left want, to bad we can't have two health systems=rupub/demo...

A SOCIALIZED MEDICINE DEATH SENTENCE
The tragic ordeal of Charlie Gard.
June 30, 2017

Lloyd Billingsley
brit.jpg


The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against Chris Gard and Connie Yates of the United Kingdom, whose 10-month-old child Charlie Gard will be “allowed to die,” a decision supposedly “in his own best interest,” as a British judge put it. According to a timeline in the Daily Mail, here is how Charlie’s story has played out.

Charlie Gard was born a healthy baby on August 4, 2016, but at eight months the child was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage. Charlie began to lose weight but in January 2017 his mother Connie Yates found an American doctor willing to offer Charlie a trial therapy called nucleoside.

Connie set up a website and succeeded in raising enough money to cover Charlie’s travel to America by air ambulance and the cost of the experimental treatment. But then the British legal system handed Charlie a setback.

On April 3, 2017, a High Court judge questioned whether Connie and Chris should be allowed to take Charlie to America for treatment, and whether doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital should turn off the baby’s life-support system. On April 11, the court ruled that the doctors were in fact permitted to do so.

...

A Socialized Medicine Death Sentence
Good boy, repeating the party line.
It's what you and your ilk do...
:whip:
 
The point, that you conveniently missed, is socialized medicine makes medical decisions, not on the ability to aid the ill, but on the expense to society to do so. So a liberal judge made a ruling on a liberal law and you say this was not a liberal decision. You probably think it is OK as just another late term abortion.

As far as Gorsuch being another idiot juror, let me remind you of R B Ginsburg, the definition of idiot.
Is that why those countries have a better life expectancy than we do?
Hmmmmmmm............................

Interesting, let us see what the life expectancies are;

List of countries by life expectancy - Wikipedia

By the WHO numbers, we are number 31, just above Cuba.

By the CIA world fact book, we are #42.

The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency

And we are #43 from this site;

Life Expectancy for Countries

Perhaps this sums it up best;

 

Forum List

Back
Top