P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,956
- 4,381
- 1,815
Do you have something to the contrary?Nobody, they were not part of the war.P F Tinmore, et al,
What is the issue in you post? Be clear.
(COMMENT)You are dancing around the issues in my post.
First, it does not say anything about "inside the border of Palestine." In 1949, the term "Palestine" was the title given to territory subject to the Mandate.
Without regard to what you interpretation of the borders or Armistice Lines are, it does NOT apply to the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) of 1949 or today. There was no agreement other than the four, none of which apply to anyone other than the signatories.
If I'm dancing, then it is because you are trying to twist the language to fit the undeserving HoAP of something they are not properly entitled.
Most Respectfully,
RFirst, it does not say anything about "inside the border of Palestine." In 1949, the term "Palestine" was the title given to territory subject to the Mandate.
Yes it does. you need to read up.
Not only that but the preamble to all four armistice agreements call for peace "in Palestine." And UN resolutions use the term "in Palestine."
But you, reading from your Israeli propaganda handbook, deny the existence of Palestine.
Who signed on behalf of Palestine?
Treaties were signed Between Palestine and surrounding Arab nations, and only the Arab nations signed?
Are you sure?