- Aug 21, 2012
- 6,199
- 3,576
- 928
Are you trying to be a dumb-ass or do you come by it naturally?No, he did not, or he would have succeeded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you trying to be a dumb-ass or do you come by it naturally?No, he did not, or he would have succeeded.
They did. HR2It isn’t and has never been about the southern border, otherwise they would have passed the bill that gave them almost everything they wanted on the border.
The Biden administration can return to the policies they eliminated and that would work. Now, Johnson could have demanded that as a condition.
He failed, Pinochet. Hugo, warm up the helicopters.Are you trying to be a dumb-ass or do you come by it naturally?
You’re dumber than I thought.He failed, Pinochet. Hugo, warm up the helicopters.
Except the Democrats are in 100% lock-step. Republicans are the ones divided.I believe these days Will Rogers would see things reversed. His quotes:
- “I’m not a member of any organized political party…. I’m a Democrat.”
- “Democrats never agree on anything, that’s why they’re Democrats. If they agreed with each other, they’d be Republicans.”
Well, he fooled them. He didn’t even fight"WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker Mike Johnson told fellow Republicans on Tuesday that sweeping changes to U.S. border policy would be their “hill to die on” in negotiations that have already grown tense as Congress considers President Joe Biden’s $110 billion package for the wars in Ukraine and Israel and other security needs."
House Speaker Johnson is insisting on sweeping border security changes in a deal for Ukraine aid
House Speaker Mike Johnson tells fellow Republicans that sweeping changes to U.S. border policy will be their “hill to die on” in negotiations over President Joe Biden’s nearly $106 billion package for the wars in Ukraine and Israel and other security needs.apnews.com
They passed a bill and sent it to the senate where Schumer has refused to bring it up for debate.It isn’t and has never been about the southern border, otherwise they would have passed the bill that gave them almost everything they wanted on the border.
The Dems will pass the Bill after this election.They passed a bill and sent it to the senate where Schumer has refused to bring it up for debate.
They had the opportunity to pass a BIPARTISAN bill tbe Dems would have also passed that gave them almost everything.They did. HR2
Nice spin.They had the opportunity to pass a BIPARTISAN bill tbe Dems would have also passed that gave them almost everything.
WHat was so objectionable in HR2 that SChumer couldin't bring it up for debate??They didn’t. Instead they put forth a bill that was sure to fail.
Same could be said of your partySo either:
They don’t really want to fix it (election year, border is a critical voter issue, it would be a disaster if Biden were credited with fixing it)…
Or they are spoiled, incompetent politicians who have no clue how to work with each other and how pass anything and instead of trying….pull Political stunts and point fingers at the other side for refusing to play.
Or both.
Nice spin.
WHat was so objectionable in HR2 that SChumer couldin't bring it up for debate??
Not on this issue.Same could be said of your party
Nope. Repubs in he House send the Senate a bill. Senate marks it up and send it back and then they negotiate.Too draconian.
Politics in a multi party system is about the art of negotiation and compromise to get at least some of of what each side wants. The bipartisan immigration bI’ll did that. HR2? Not at all.
If the Repubs were series about it they would be negotiating…like they did in the bill they refused. But they aren’t. It is politics so they bring up an unsupportable bill that contains NOTHING for the other side. See the difference?
Absolutely. Senate should have been talking to the House about their concerns. Lankford certainly didn't do that.Not on this issue.
"Representative Democracy" Is a Contradiction in TermsThe will of The people, is what took place yesterday, and today. How can you even claim, otherwise? Yesterday150 plus Republican House of Representatives along with 160 plus Democrats, overwhelmingly voted to have a vote on Saturday, up or down, by each representative for the foreign aid packages.
Today, through MAJORITY VOTE of our representatives, it passed.
There is nothing nefarious about that....it is how our representation in government, is supposed to work.
And it did.
Wee-Wee on the PeopleIt wasn't the will of the people.
Wheelies Give Him the WilliesRight, like the "inflation reduction act" was about reducing inflation.
Victim of Jemmy Madison's MadnessI don't think I feel very strongly about anything political/geopolitical anymore, C4All. It's getting to be that I really just don't care any more. I'll offer my perspective on here once in a while now. If I feel like it. But I don't even really feel like doing that any more.
I've accepted that both theoretical sides of the party-of-one are destroying the prosperity and fabric of our country. And I don't accept that the electorate itself, collectively speaking, is even qualified to understand that this is happening, much less getting into the why and how. Now, yes, that may well sound elitist or prideful, but it's not really. It's just how I see the whole of the situation.
I got my lawn cut today. Walks and street curb edged nicely. Cars are washed. Fed the birds. Sealed the main driveway. And walked around the classic car show for about a half hour. Those are meaningful things.
Tomorrow I'm going to powerwash my siding.
But I'm not sure if my neighbors are allowed to kill me if they catch me working on a Sunday. I think I read something about that in ''the good book'' some place a long time ago.
The "Snob Mob" Describes Both Parties in the Richkid ReichShe simply repeats the Democrat narrative, no matter how stupid and nonsensical that is, while believing that it somehow makes her superior.