Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

SYTFE is around, but why is he not giving up context?
Context is kinda important on this issue.
It's cowardly to use chemicals when making war on someone.
Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc
So should you declare war on someone or just gas then?
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
He didn't. He used chemicals to kill prisoners. Kind of different than lobbing them out there in the general population.

Weapons mean you have to transport them to the site you want them released at. Using gas on prisoners under your control is killing people in a factory. A weapon is something you send out to kill people you have no control over. Using gas on people under your control is execution.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.
He was right so we will see you April 16th at the PDT press conference featuring Sean Spicer as the opening act.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.
He was right so we will see you April 16th at the PDT press conference featuring Sean Spicer as the opening act.
LOL

If he was right, he wouldn't have apologized.

I swear, you people are the dumbest creatures to crawl on the Earth.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.


But he didn't use open air chemical weapons, you might want to look up the difference. I know you're more interested in regressive propaganda instead of facts. But facts are facts. Hell by your standards the US uses chemical weapons on our citizens, for capital punishment.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?
Like Bush, they'll defend anything this administration says or does.

Anything.

Until Trump is out of office. Then they'll call him a Liberal.


What Some of us have always been saying that Trump is and was always a liberal with just an R after his name


Why the liberals detest him the only way I can figure is the "(R) "now and he goes down to the infantile liberal level and fights them at their own game.


.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.


But he didn't use open air chemical weapons, you might want to look up the difference. I know you're more interested in regressive propaganda instead of facts. But facts are facts. Hell by your standards the US uses chemical weapons on our citizens, for capital punishment.


Or in our food.... Aka Monsanto


.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.


But he didn't use open air chemical weapons, you might want to look up the difference. I know you're more interested in regressive propaganda instead of facts. But facts are facts. Hell by your standards the US uses chemical weapons on our citizens, for capital punishment.
In terms of Spicer's idiotic comment, no one gives a shit that Assad used them in open air whereas Hitler used them in confined areas.

They both used chemicals as a weapon to kill people.

As dumb and devoted as you are, even Spicer gets it; as he apologized for making such an absurd comparison. You can take his cock out of your mouth anytime now. You're embarrassing yourself.

1233796371590.gif
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.


But he didn't use open air chemical weapons, you might want to look up the difference. I know you're more interested in regressive propaganda instead of facts. But facts are facts. Hell by your standards the US uses chemical weapons on our citizens, for capital punishment.


Or in our food.... Aka Monsanto


.


GMO foods aren't chemicals.
 
He is apologizing for you liberals making what he said into something he did not say. hitler did not use chemical weapons of any kind on the civilian people of Germany. The fact is that the gas used in the gas chambers was not a weapons grade chemical agent. They were killed with carbon monoxide and-or cyanide gas mixtures in most cases Zyklon B. The latter was used at Auschwitz but it was more expensive and not used as often as Carbon Monoxide. CBR's were not used against political opponents by hitler. They were used as genocidal tools against a religious group much as liberals would like to do to Christians. As you say Sunni man no dead for autopsy, but most of the bodies were burned, just the scientific records of the amounts ZB used are more than the amount to kill roaches. The vast majority of them were killed with carbon mono.
How sad.

Hitler used chemicals and he used them as a weapon to kill millions of people. It sure didn't take long for you sick fucks to sink to the lowest depths imaginable just to defend this administration.

Congrats. :clap:


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against opposing military forces or population centers. Yes he used chemicals to kill people, but it was done in controlled environments and not as a let's just take out all life in a city like Assad. Reality and facts, the worse enemy of regressive hacks. Enjoy hack.
The semantics are yours, Loser.

Hitler used chemicals as a weapon.

Spicer will be gone before tax day.


But he didn't use open air chemical weapons, you might want to look up the difference. I know you're more interested in regressive propaganda instead of facts. But facts are facts. Hell by your standards the US uses chemical weapons on our citizens, for capital punishment.
In terms of Spicer's idiotic comment, no one gives a shit that Assad used them in open air whereas Hitler used them in confined areas.

They both used chemicals as a weapon to kill people.

As dumb and devoted as you are, even Spicer gets it; as he apologized for making such an absurd comparison. You can take his cock out of your mouth anytime now. You're embarrassing yourself.

1233796371590.gif


Poor thing, more semantics and running back to your faggot roots, can you get more pathetic there snowflake?
 
As you may know, today Sean Spicer said that Hitler did not use chemical weapons on his own people, but he killed German Jews, after stripping them of their citizenship. Spicer also said Hitler didn't use weapons in combat, but the Chemical Weapons Convention does not require that gas be dropped from planes or shot from cannons. Hitler would have been in violation of the Convention anyway.

Politifact therefore gives the prolific liar Sean Spicer a Pants on Fire rating.
Spicer wrongly says Hitler didn't use chemical weapons
Politifact which owned by a man who is a MAJOR donor to the Clinton Regime....trustworthy!
Politifact, who had to research Sean Spicer's Russian Dressing comment.
 
What part do you disagree with?

Can Zyklon B gas be used on a battle field?

Yes, or no?

No.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

A "chemical WEAPON" is a weapon of mass destruction that can be deployed against troops and civilian populations to kill or maim large numbers in an indiscriminate fashion.

Look, you hate Trump and want to attack enemies of the party, I get it. But you're REALLY being stupid about this.

My apologies. Clearly, Germany didn't use a chemical to kill large numbers in an indiscriminate fashion. Could you add any more qualifiers so that the comparison doesn't stand in your mind? Maybe you could add that the dictator using it has to have a silly mustache.

They murdered millions, but that is not the use of chemical weapons, and you know it.

What a puss.

How about they used chemical environments with the purpose to kill? Is that better sweethart?
 
No, Assad didn't round them up first, he just gassed them in the streets.
Stop the propaganda. Assad wasn't behind the gas attack.
mo

So you are now claiming responsibility? That is the only way you could possibly know the truth is if you are the culprit!
Simple common sense should be enough to tell you that if the gas attack plays into Israel's hand and weakens Assad's hand, Assad probably isn't responsible. Or do you, despite everything, believe whatever CNN or the NYT tells you?

When I lived in China, I would argue with the Chinese over US foreign policy. Sometimes I would be forced to admit our policies were less than benign, but, I would claim, this doesn't mean the average American is a heartless, bloodthirsty monster. Americans are lied to by our media just as Chinese are lied to by your media. But, they would say, we aren't invading other countries and bombing foreign civilians. Chinese people must be morally superior to Americans because Americans are ok with murderous US hegemony.

What perplexed us both was why? The Chinese were convinced when the US would bomb a country like Serbia or Libya that there was some hidden benefit to America. They couldn't buy it that we were doing it for the benefit of the people we were bombing. At the time, I didn't understand that Americans don't run US foreign policy, so I was forced to maintain that Americans believed we were bombing Somalia for the benefit of Somalians. Americans must be very stupid, they would say.

Stop being stupid.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.
Spicer apologizes. Liberals win the thread.
Spicer apologizes after receiving sharp criticism for saying Hitler didn’t use chemical weapons
 

Forum List

Back
Top