Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,945
- 5,669
No, I just made the case that you’re too ignorant to ask a question about AGW let alone understand an answer.You just made the case for the skeptics! Thank you! That's EXACTLY what we've been saying!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I just made the case that you’re too ignorant to ask a question about AGW let alone understand an answer.You just made the case for the skeptics! Thank you! That's EXACTLY what we've been saying!
Bet your arse. I parrot NASA, you parrot idiots and links you’re ashamed to post.
No, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!No, I just made the case that you’re too ignorant to ask a question about AGW let alone understand an answer.
HilariousThen your ability to READ is in question...
Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses - NASA Science
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.science.nasa.gov
90% of Earth ice has grown EVERY YEAR since your Co2 FRAUD started, and millions of years before that...
As for the "ocean rise," here is where the IPCC got caught FUDGING and LYING yet again...
“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some
SERIOUS ONGOING FUDGEBAKING FRAUD AT IPCC and that ALSO EXPLAINS why DAG cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO OF "ocean rise..."
you're funny, YOU CANT EVEN READ YOUR OWN SHIT.No, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!
You’re the best!!
Thank you!!
You never asked an intelligent question….do you still beat your wife ? You can‘t read can you. You have my sympathyNo, you stated PERFECTLY why rational people believe AGW to be an anti-science Cult. There are too many variables, but the one you INSIST drives the imaginary “warming” process does not raise temperature!
You’re the best!!
Thank you!!
I’ve already thanked you for destroying the AGW cult, I’m not sure what you’re looking forYou never asked an intelligent question….do you still beat your wife ? You can‘t read can you. You have my sympathy
Actually I'm an atheist/agnostic and with the varied racial and ethnic mix in my family, hardly a "white nationalist".You‘re a supporter of white nationalism and the continued flow of money from rich oil producers that supports anti AGW. It’s a faction that also supports a return to a Christian based gov though few of you actually practice Christian values. Its demonstrated by the simple fact that all institutions of higher education in the world along with the religious leaders of ALL the major religions support AGW.
But, you don’t and you lie and fraud your way through your continued denial.
Like you.The entire military ? No, there are a minority of idiot frauds in every organization, but they are often the low lives.
No where near as desperate as you are.You’re desperate to sound smart aren’t you.
"delirous (sp. delirious ) deniers" are ones like you who can't do the math or science and are willing to believe those who use fraud to advance your political agenda.You’ll never know. But that won’t keep you from making up shit about people. You delirous deniers do it
all the time.
Rate isn't the factor, it's amount of total increase (will address soon in another post).Being totally oblivious to what AGW is about, means your posts are irrelevant…it’s about the rate at which the warming trend is occurring, not that it’s warming. We are coming out of an ice age, faster in the last 200 years than at anytime modern man has been on earth. It’s simple. If you don’t believe or understand evolution, you probably don’t understand AGW.
Btw, WHERE do you get YOUR numbers. Name and link your source.
Speaking of which, at @400 ppm that makes CO2 about 0.0004% of the dry atmosphere.MIT it will be. Now you admit it is up to MIT, believe me all will be grateful to me for telling you to go away. Let MIT deal with this.
But because of the complexity of the earth’s climatesystem, building any model that can simulate thechanging climate to the satisfaction of policy makers is adifficult task and an ongoing subject of research.Such a model has to answer what happens to temperature,precipitation, humidity, wind speed and direction, clouds,and ice all around the globe over long time scales as aresult of radiativeforcing due to changing amounts ofgreenhouse gases and aerosols.
Neither this nor your previous post just before PROVES that CO2 levels are the cause of the temperature blip of increase.According to NOAA's 2023 Annual Climate Report the combined land and ocean temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.11° Fahrenheit (0.06° Celsius) per decade since 1850, or about 2° F in total. The rate of warming since 1982 is more than three times as fast: 0.36° F (0.20° C) per decade.
Climate Change: Global Temperature | NOAA Climate.gov
View attachment 939679
www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-t
NASA
THE cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age. Carbon dioxide from human activities is increasing about 250 times faster than it did from natural sources after the last Ice Age.3
Sane and educated persons will first seek to avoid generalities and get down to specifics.Every sane and educated person on the planet knows it is a fact. You would get laughed out of any room of these people immediately.
On AVERAGE, most flora/plants need at least 300 ppm of CO2 to barely survive. 400ppm of CO2 bares keeps them alive but they don't flourish. Most greenhouse grow operations use about 1,200 ppm of CO2.Also he is against the gas that is the life blood of Earth. Plants will die if his plan is followed. Life on Earth will perish due to lack of food. He wants Earth to die.
So Komrade, you are not a part of the free enterprise, capitalism, profit making, wealth creation process of our Nation's economy.I’m fine with you making your own choices not to get shots and dying at a higher rate….it’s happened and I feel fine with it.
Climate change ? Red states shouldn’t get the benefits of federal aid it they are red states….fine with me. You’re in your own Florida in the next storm surge. You think federal agencies lie to you, fine, fix up your own mess. You don’t trust NASA ? Make sure no red states get contract work for the next space exploitation.
No, that's you and Dogasa.That is a troll from another board who shitposts for attention.
He's clueless on about 90% of what he says, and mangling the other 10%.I’ve already thanked you for destroying the AGW cult, I’m not sure what you’re looking for
Actually you have been doing that all through this thread.No, I just made the case that you’re too ignorant to ask a question about AGW let alone understand an answer.
DUFUS!My side ? Where. Show the link….it could just be your made up lie of what someone has said….show the link…