Stand and fight!

[LoneLaugher]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Shut up. You've never said those words to anyone in person and you know it.

Liberals act.....judiciously and with purpose. And....not out of fear.

 

[saveliberty]

I wouldn't rule out a bright blinding flash and huge boom with associated mushrooming clouds.

That's because you are cray-cray.

Better than boots on the ground. I didn't suggest it was a primary tool, just a potential one. Everyone is their own personal crazy.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I'll add Carbine to that list.

The guy's name is not Carbine. You've been doing that for years, Kojak. Knock it off.

What? Is that a microaggression or something?

No it's you being a precocious child. Nothing you do is micro, tubby.

 

[Unkotare]

Really, the best we can hope for is a policy of containment. ....

No, that's not the best we can hope for or expect.

Your suggestions?

I "suggest" the world finally get pissed enough to go and utterly destroy every last one of those fucking animals, and then don't fuck everything up for a ten-minute press conference AGAIN.

 

[saveliberty]

Glow in the dark terrorists and easy to detect at the airport...

 

[Unkotare]

I wouldn't rule out a bright blinding flash and huge boom with associated mushrooming clouds.

That's because you are cray-cray.

Better than boots on the ground. .....

No, not better at all.

 

[saveliberty]

Really, the best we can hope for is a policy of containment. ....

No, that's not the best we can hope for or expect.

Your suggestions?

I "suggest" the world finally get pissed enough to go and utterly destroy every last one of those fucking animals, and then don't fuck everything up for a ten-minute press conference AGAIN.

You know where they all are?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Enlist to prove that there's a difference between you and the people who don't want to fight and die for the shithole of the Middle East.

If you're willing to give up your life for the sake the Iraqis, or for the French for that matter, prove it.

I'm not about to do it, and in that sense, you're no different than I am.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Shut up. You've never said those words to anyone in person and you know it.

Liberals act.....judiciously and with purpose. And....not out of fear.

Answer the question, you crybaby.

Who are you to control the choices of others? They chose. Or... are you suddenly not as "pro choice" as you claim to be?

You are a person, are you not? So, I just did say that, from one living, breathing person to another living, breathing person. From me to you.

 

[idb]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

And what if they chose to enlist to fight for a fake cause sold to them by the propagandists in the media and the self-aggrandisers in the government and the war profiteers and the couch warriors?
What if they are sent off nobly believing that they are fighting to defend their country but it's all a lie?

I wonder if that might happen.

 

[saveliberty]

Only the retarded think boots on the ground works in the Middle East.

 

[idb]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Shut up. You've never said those words to anyone in person and you know it.

Liberals act.....judiciously and with purpose. And....not out of fear.

Answer the question, you crybaby.

Who are you to control the choices of others? They chose. Or... are you suddenly not as "pro choice" as you claim to be?

You are a person, are you not? So, I just did say that, from one living, breathing person to another living, breathing person. From me to you.

You're absolutely right...everyone has the right to be deceived into offering their life for a false cause.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Enlist to prove that there's a difference between you and the people who don't want to fight and die for the shithole of the Middle East.

Don't need to. We already have those who are willing and able to do the same. They chose to take that risk. You? You're averse to taking risks. Your passivity is disgusting.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Shut up. You've never said those words to anyone in person and you know it.

Liberals act.....judiciously and with purpose. And....not out of fear.

Answer the question, you crybaby.

Who are you to control the choices of others? They chose. Or... are you suddenly not as "pro choice" as you claim to be?

You are a person, are you not? So, I just did say that, from one living, breathing person to another living, breathing person. From me to you.

You said it to me.....you've never said it to anyone IN REAL LIFE. You lying poser.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I'm not about to do it, and in that sense, you're no different than I am.

Nice try. If you're no different from me, or vise versa, you'd be wanting to take direct action too. Or I'd want to take a passive approach, to avoid boots on the ground if at all possible.

But, fortunately, Carbine, I was blessed to be nothing like you.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Enlist to prove that there's a difference between you and the people who don't want to fight and die for the shithole of the Middle East.

Don't need to. We already have those who are willing and able to do the same. They chose to take that risk. You? You're averse to taking risks. Your passivity is disgusting.

What is disgusting is yiu suggesting that anyone else is passive. You are not doing a fucking thing to fight anyone. You are afraid and unfit to join the military. That considered.......stop talking about fighting.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm not about to do it, and in that sense, you're no different than I am.

Nice try. If you're no different from me, or vise versa, you'd be wanting to take direct action too. Or I'd want to take a passive approach, to avoid boots on the ground if at all possible.

But, fortunately, Carbine, I was blessed to be nothing like you.

The Russians escalated their involvement in Syria. The US kills Jihadi John, and also kills the leader of ISIS in Libya. A major offensive is launched against ISIS.

then the attack in France occurs.

There is no support for your claim that inaction is causing terrorist attacks.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Clayton would rather let more people die at the hands of radical Islam rather than to take more direct action. Talking is the only policy directive Democrats have.

You want to take direct action instead of talking?

Enlist.

Why? If all you liberals do is talk and negotiate, why don't you become a diplomat?

I'll tell you what I tell the other anti war freaks out there who oppose sending their sons and/or daughters off to war:

They chose to enlist. They chose to embrace the risk. Who are we to tell them not to? What good are they to America if they aren't allowed to defend her and her allies?

Shut up. You've never said those words to anyone in person and you know it.

Liberals act.....judiciously and with purpose. And....not out of fear.

Answer the question, you crybaby.

Who are you to control the choices of others? They chose. Or... are you suddenly not as "pro choice" as you claim to be?

You are a person, are you not? So, I just did say that, from one living, breathing person to another living, breathing person. From me to you.

You said it to me.....you've never said it to anyone IN REAL LIFE. You lying poser.

Answer the question, you crybaby. Who are you to make the choice for someone who wants to enlist in the military? It's their life to live, not yours. And as far as I'm aware, this IS real life. So, I think I just did say it to someone in real life. You.

As for "Liberals act judiciously, and with purpose. And not out of fear."

Oh really? Then why are you sooo scared to put boots on the ground? You negotiate, you talk, you pontificate to other about the immorality of military action, all out of fear, not out of purpose.

 

[Unkotare]

Only the retarded think boots on the ground works in the Middle East.

It's worked before.

 

[TemplarKormac]

There is no support for your claim that inaction is causing terrorist attacks.

There is nothing to support your claim that taking no action averts terrorist attacks either. Want to explain that little gem?