Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stand with Retard!
He actually asked if the federal government was aware it was not allowed to just kill US citizens without a trial.
Why, just yesterday, the federal government took a US citizen to court for being a terrorist and nary a drone was in sight! They did not save us all a lot of time and kill the bastard. They actually arrested him and took him to court. Who ever heard of such a thing?
Apparently Rand Paul has not. Even though Obama has not killed by drone any suspected bad guys in the US in the more than four years he could have, Rand Paul felt he needed to ask Obama if he was allowed to.
The Attorney General diplomatically explained to Rand Paul that he was asking the dumbest question to come down the pike in some time, and then went on to explain what everyone else knows. The AG explained that he wasn't planning on blowing up any US citizens without trial since we already have a system for arresting and trying them which has worked just fine all this time, so why change now.
I would say yesterday's court appearance by a terrorist US citizen on US soil kind of puts an exclamation point at the end of that answer, but noooooooo. Not for Rand Paul.
But Rand's brain must have blown that part of the answer off. Because he conflated the second part of the AG's answer with his drone killling fetish.
The AG explained in the second part of his response there are hypothetical situations where the use of military force in the United States might be necessary. He then sited examples like the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Again, something anyone with any kind of common sense already knows.
Apparently Retard Paul has no common sense and has a low voltage brain. So now we can enjoy watching him bash himself in the head with a wrench on the Senate floor.
Clearly your brain stopped working the moment your mouth began....
How long before Obama orders the dissolution of the Senate, declaring it hostile to US National Security?
During his filibuster, Paul said the fuzziness of such language created a slippery slope that could lead to the targeting of citizens who merely have different opinions about policies than the president.
"You can't be judge, jury and executioner all in one," Paul said.
"No American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found guilty of a crime by a court," Paul said. "How can you kill someone without going to a judge, or a jury?"
Paul is truly and ignorant idiot.
Hes attempting to contrive a controversy where none exists replete with 'what if' and slippery slope fallacies.
Stand with Retard!
He actually asked if the federal government was aware it was not allowed to just kill US citizens without a trial.
Why, just yesterday, the federal government took a US citizen to court for being a terrorist and nary a drone was in sight! They did not save us all a lot of time and kill the bastard. They actually arrested him and took him to court. Who ever heard of such a thing?
Apparently Rand Paul has not. Even though Obama has not killed by drone any suspected bad guys in the US in the more than four years he could have, Rand Paul felt he needed to ask Obama if he was allowed to.
The Attorney General diplomatically explained to Rand Paul that he was asking the dumbest question to come down the pike in some time, and then went on to explain what everyone else knows. The AG explained that he wasn't planning on blowing up any US citizens without trial since we already have a system for arresting and trying them which has worked just fine all this time, so why change now.
I would say yesterday's court appearance by a terrorist US citizen on US soil kind of puts an exclamation point at the end of that answer, but noooooooo. Not for Rand Paul.
But Rand's brain must have blown that part of the answer off. Because he conflated the second part of the AG's answer with his drone killling fetish.
The AG explained in the second part of his response there are hypothetical situations where the use of military force in the United States might be necessary. He then sited examples like the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Again, something anyone with any kind of common sense already knows.
Apparently Retard Paul has no common sense and has a low voltage brain. So now we can enjoy watching him bash himself in the head with a wrench on the Senate floor.
Clearly your brain stopped working the moment your mouth began....
Irony. See post 37. Retard Rand's artifice for his fearmongering demagoguery is exposed. The AG said drone strikes on US citizens on US soil absent an imminent threat is unconstitutional. Rand is full of shit and is just up there to scare little rabbits like you for no reason other than his personal aggrandizement.
Sorry to make your butt hurt.
How long before Obama orders the dissolution of the Senate, declaring it hostile to US National Security?
How long before Obama orders the dissolution of the Senate, declaring it hostile to US National Security?
He'll wait until Anakin is turned to the dark side.
Ted Cruz Gets Holder To Admit That Killing Americans With Drones On U.S. Soil Is Unconstitutional | Flopping Aces
Watch the video. Don't clamp your hands over your eyes and ears now.
Watch the video. It is unmistakable. The AG says killing US citizens on US soil absent imminent threat is unconstitutional.
Sorry you got taken by a self-aggrandizing demagogue.
Anyone who insists after this point that the AG said its okay to kill US citizens on US soil without due process is willfully lying. Just as Rand Paul has been willfully lying so he would have an excuse to build himself up.
You can kill American citizens without a trial. It's called deadly force and has many legal constitutional applications.
You are exactly the kind of loon that Rand Paul is marketing to.
The abject butthurt from the loony libs in this thread is pure entertainment.Fuck Ayn Rand Paul and the Aqua Buddha horse he rode in on.
HOW DARE ANYBODY CALL OUT OUR BELOVED DEAR LEADER, OR, ANYBODY ASSOCIATED WITH HIM!
I may not agree on every day policy with Rand Paul, but today he filibustering to draw attention to an issue that is neither left nor right. This is a Civil Liberties issue. How far have we fallen as Democrats to allow the Federal Government to deprive non-combatant US citizens of life on US soil without due process?
Senator Dick Durbin's objection to a resolution on this issue may have marked my official parting of ways with the entire Democratic Party.
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
STAND WITH RAND!
How long before Obama orders the dissolution of the Senate, declaring it hostile to US National Security?
