Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a Knight with a lance, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Still would legally be considered assault and open the one who used the pepper spray/wasp killer to a law suit that the plaintiff would win........Pepper spray or Wasp killer should be sufficient.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a katana wielding Samurai, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Since you could face serious harm or death by German Tiger tank, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?Since you could face serious harm or death by a katana wielding Samurai, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
The fat asses suffer from heart disease and diabetes by their own gluttony, but if they have a heart attack and just happen to test positive for covid, it's no longer their fault they can't control their behavior.Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
No to shooting peoples without a mask on, instead I say just shoot ALL the fat peoples instead. IF you see ANY fat bastard just get the gun out and shoot that fat POS who is using up PRECIOUS oxygen. If we eliminate ALL fat bastards, then we can save this PRECIOUS oxygen and in turn Save The Planet
#SHOOT-ALL-THE-FAT-BASTARDS
#PRESERVE-OUR-PRECIOUS-OXYGEN
#FAT-BASTARDS-ARE-DESTROYING-THE-PLANET
#SAVE-THE-PLANET-FOR-CONSERVATIVES-AND-OUR-FRIENDS-THE-FLUFFY-BUNNY-RABBITS
Based on the OP's idiotic statement, I should then have the right to shoot a driver that cuts me off by inches, putting my life and others at risk because they must be ahead of everyone on the road. Same goes if I see them on their phone instead of paying attention to the road.Since you could face serious harm or death by a Knight with a lance, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
..I was just about to post that.....good callThe fat asses suffer from heart disease and diabetes by their own gluttony, but if they have a heart attack and just happen to test positive for covid, it's no longer their fault they can't control their behavior.Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
No to shooting peoples without a mask on, instead I say just shoot ALL the fat peoples instead. IF you see ANY fat bastard just get the gun out and shoot that fat POS who is using up PRECIOUS oxygen. If we eliminate ALL fat bastards, then we can save this PRECIOUS oxygen and in turn Save The Planet
#SHOOT-ALL-THE-FAT-BASTARDS
#PRESERVE-OUR-PRECIOUS-OXYGEN
#FAT-BASTARDS-ARE-DESTROYING-THE-PLANET
#SAVE-THE-PLANET-FOR-CONSERVATIVES-AND-OUR-FRIENDS-THE-FLUFFY-BUNNY-RABBITS
Based on the OP's idiotic statement, I should then have the right to shoot a driver that cuts me off by inches, putting my life and others at risk because they must be ahead of everyone on the road. Same goes if I see them on their phone instead of paying attention to the road.Since you could face serious harm or death by a Knight with a lance, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
This is a danger that I face daily. Idiots turning our highways into NASCAR for the sake of arriving a full minute early to their destination.
Shoot the bastards.
not when a 45 speaksCan you point out the flaw in my argument?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Lord the stupid is strong in this one.
The survival rate is 98% son.
not when a 45 speaksCan you point out the flaw in my argument?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Lord the stupid is strong in this one.
The survival rate is 98% son.
be careful what you wish for It might come true if you keep mouthing off repub bullshit Some one might get pissednot when a 45 speaksCan you point out the flaw in my argument?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Lord the stupid is strong in this one.
The survival rate is 98% son.
Of the virus you moron. Go ahead and pull a weapon on me kid.
be careful what you wish for It might come true if you keep mouthing off repub bullshit Some one might get pissednot when a 45 speaksCan you point out the flaw in my argument?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Lord the stupid is strong in this one.
The survival rate is 98% son.
Of the virus you moron. Go ahead and pull a weapon on me kid.
The day that starts it's another shot heard 'round the world. Bring it, leftist fucktards! Grr!
I can knock your gun away and beat you half to death with my bare hands, and in no way are any of you fucks as proficient with a firearm as I am.
12-4 is just dialing in. The rest are after dialing in.
so if a black woman walks up to you without a mask you would shoot her ??Can you point out the flaw in my argument?Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Lord the stupid is strong in this one.
bullshit !‘Liberals’ are advocates of the right to carry, and indeed carry guns – unlike conservatives they’re not constantly whining about it and trying to turn it into a political ‘issue.’
Otherwise, the thread premise is ridiculous and doesn’t merit a response.
View attachment 337460Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
No to shooting peoples without a mask on, instead I say just shoot ALL the fat peoples instead. IF you see ANY fat bastard just get the gun out and shoot that fat POS who is using up PRECIOUS oxygen. If we eliminate ALL fat bastards, then we can save this PRECIOUS oxygen and in turn Save The Planet
#SHOOT-ALL-THE-FAT-BASTARDS
#PRESERVE-OUR-PRECIOUS-OXYGEN
#FAT-BASTARDS-ARE-DESTROYING-THE-PLANET
#SAVE-THE-PLANET-FOR-CONSERVATIVES-AND-OUR-FRIENDS-THE-FLUFFY-BUNNY-RABBITS
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to “liberal” government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
The survival rate is 98% son.