Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, I thought I could post the same as you do, say the same things, except direct my comments at Democrats. I forgot, you are the Tyrant here. Thank you for reminding me who rules who.How dare you. Who has been charged with sedition?You want to convict before any charges are brought and a trial held?
A poster as a tyrant?Sorry, I thought I could post the same as you do, say the same things, except direct my comments at Democrats. I forgot, you are the Tyrant here. Thank you for reminding me who rules who.
Remember that the Constitution restricts Congress from writing laws restricting the free speech rights of individuals. Note, and this is very important, that the individuals in question would NOT have their right to speak restricted. They could still say whatever they wanted and not face prosecution for a crime. Instead, they would be dealing with the consequences speaking. Free speech rights do not shield one from the consequences of uttering said speech. An employee of a company can say whatever they want to on social media, but they do not have the right to force their employer to do nothing as a consequence of that speech. A hypothetical. An officer of a company has insider knowledge of the company and blabs everything he/she knows online. Does the company have the right to fire the officer? Absolutely it does. You walk up to a proud young couple pushing a baby in a stroller and you say, "That's the ugliest baby I've ever seen". You have the right to say it, but there may be consequences that land you in the ER.So they should have their Constitutional rights taken away because they work in the Bureaucracy?
Hitler also arrested his political opponents. Who is doing that? Not Trump.Hitler did the same stuff when taking over Germany...
You had to be loyal to keep your job...
I think Trump shouldgo into schools and get students to tell teachers if their parents are saying anti Trump statements at home..
Nothing extreme about what I said. You just have nothing to say so you use a buzz word. Nice try, no cigar.You extremist are a laugh riot.
Trump is getting ready to unleash his Brownshirts.Imagine what Trump could have got done if the government was not full of saboteurs in his first term. This is a good start to weed these people out. When a president makes policies they need to be implemented not kneecapped by traitors.
"In a normal workplace, these employees would be fired for insubordination. In the most extreme of circumstances they would be charged with sedition against the government and punished accordingly, with execution not outside the range of possibilities.
Instead, many of these conspirators—some of them dedicated socialists—were celebrated for their efforts by the Trump-Deranged media and the Democrat leaders who egged them on. But the day of reckoning may arrive with a second Trump term that offers the benefit of hindsight, having rooted them out while their guard was down.
From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to Trump’s policies, an effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House.
Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, where one top official was recently found to harbor Hamas sympathies."
Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might 'Resist' Trump | Headline USA
(Headline USA) Perhaps the biggest setback to the first Trump administration was not anything inherently flawed in Republican President Donald Trump’s leadership but the sheer bulk of disloyal individuals embedded within the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, who were eager to undermine him at every...headlineusa.com
That is what we have now.No. Phuck Phascism.
Yep, the non violent group will destroy this country. Fool.Trump is getting ready to unleash his Brownshirts.
"Night of the Long Knives, in German history, purge of Nazi leaders by Adolf Hitler on June 30, 1934. Fearing that the paramilitary SA had become too powerful, Hitler ordered his elite SS guards to murder the organization’s leaders, including Ernst Röhm. Also killed that night were hundreds of other perceived opponents of Hitler."Hitler also arrested his political opponents. Who is doing that? Not Trump.
And Republicans are all in. It sucks.That is what we have now.
Trump supporters are not violent. Your side has Antifa and BLM and every other thug on the Soros payroll. Try reality."Night of the Long Knives, in German history, purge of Nazi leaders by Adolf Hitler on June 30, 1934. Fearing that the paramilitary SA had become too powerful, Hitler ordered his elite SS guards to murder the organization’s leaders, including Ernst Röhm. Also killed that night were hundreds of other perceived opponents of Hitler."
Of course that is much more like what Benedict Donald has planned if his Supreme Court grants him immunity........
Not all of them.And Republicans are all in. It sucks.
Yep, the non violent group will destroy this country. Fool.
Trump is anything but non-violent.Yep, the non violent group will destroy this country. Fool.
Identify everyone in that picture and then we will talk.
That would kind of suck if you are on Social Security, Medicare, get Ag price supports, if you like border patrol agents, or having the US Army...Good. They should do it.
Fire the whole fucking lot of those dumbass federal employees.
Start over.
You have Charlottesville and J6 in 8 years. That is not violent. And J6 was a set up.Trump is anything but non-violent.
Stalin became dictator through control of the bureaucracies.Sorry, the US government is not a company...
The US has a constitution and laws... If the leader means to ignore or break those laws then it is there duty to speak up...
Just as an example, Trump can't order the execution his political opposition like his lawyer stated in court. That is a perfect example of why we need people who work for the US government to be loyal to the people and the law.
These questions would seem to violate EEO laws.Here is the .pdf file of the "questionnaire" they're using.
These questions have nothing to do with the effective operation of a government agency. This is a partisan litmus test, and nothing like this has ever been implemented by any of our government agencies.
If you disagree, please provide proof that this has been tried before.
