Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might ‘Resist’ Trump

[Lesh]

Check out Project 2025

Pretty fucked up

They want to replace career government officials with “loyalists”

 

[elektra]

Check out Project 2025
Pretty fucked up
They want to replace career government officials with “loyalists”

yep, Trump would get rid of the deep state corrupt government loyalists and replace them with qualified individuals.

Many of the jobs would simply disappear, as MAGA cuts all those useless bureaucratic leeches.
So fucked up to have such a large overbearing tyrannical government to begin with

Loyalty, yes, we need a government loyal to the people, not the politicians.

Now go tend to that sick dying president. The world need not an education on the final stage of Dementia

 

[Lesh]

yep, Trump would get rid of the deep state corrupt government loyalists and replace them with qualified individuals.

Many of the jobs would simply disappear, as MAGA cuts all those useless bureaucratic leeches.
So fucked up to have such a large overbearing tyrannical government to begin with

Loyalty, yes, we need a government loyal to the people, not the politicians.

Now go tend to that sick dying president. The world need not an education on the final stage of Dementia

Those career professionals keep things running

Trump want to install incompetent loyalists

 

[scruffy]

Check out Project 2025

Pretty fucked up

They want to replace career government officials with “loyalists”

Good. They should do it.

Fire the whole fucking lot of those dumbass federal employees.

Start over.

 

[Lesh]

Good. They should do it.

Fire the whole fucking lot of those dumbass federal employees.

Start over.

Yeah.

Let everything crash and burn. It’s what you right wing Trumpers do best

 

[scruffy]

Yeah.

Let everything crash and burn. It’s what you right wing Trumpers do best

Like it isn't crashing and burning now, you idiot?

 

[elektra]

Those career professionals keep things running

Trump want to install incompetent loyalists

Keep things running? Professionals? Talk about being in a cult, you believe and do not blasphemy.

 

[Lesh]

Keep things running? Professionals? Talk about being in a cult, you believe and do not blasphemy.

As we have seen in previous threads

You’re insane

 

[BlindBoo]

"The primary goal of the civil service system has been and continues to be to ensure that appointments to government jobs are based on merit and ability as determined through a competitive process. The principles of civil service specify that the most qualified person be appointed to the job; that appointments not be based on any other factors such as political activity or patronage; and that incumbents are protected from the political whims of elected officials. This primary purpose of civil service has remained constant throughout the various historical movements that have changed and shaped civil service over the last 200 years."

https://burbank.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=1689&meta_id=89402#:~:text=The%20first%20comprehensive%20merit%2Dbased,the%20basis%20of%20hiring%20decisions.

 

[BlindBoo]

Much like Benedict Donald's "Build the Wall" BS, he would still need Congress to change the laws.

 

[hadit]

Obey the leader at all costs. The "unified reich" comes first. All is beneath the President, who stands alone and without question or balance of power.

IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION I TELL YOU

Is there a problem with making employment decisions by looking at public statements employees make? It happens routinely in the private sector. An employee who makes public statements about actively resisting his employer's policies should expect to get a visit from HR.

 

[hadit]

Why do you hate freedom and America so much, Lastdeadender?

You do know you sound exactly like a German Nazi in 1937, amirite you fucking fascist loser?

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

yep, Trump would get rid of the deep state corrupt government loyalists and replace them with qualified individuals.

and the only qualification is that they are blindly loyal to Trump.

Just think, you could get one of those jobs!

 

[Mac1958]

Is there a problem with making employment decisions by looking at public statements employees make?

Nope.

But if your government agency employment depends upon, for the first time in America's history, your partisan political loyalty to a President, yes.

I can't imagine why anyone would disagree with that, but somehow, many do. That's how far we've fallen.

 

[hadit]

Nope.

But if your government agency employment depends upon your partisan political loyalty to a President, yes.

I can't imagine why anyone would disagree with that, but somehow, many do. That's how far we've fallen.

Let's put it this way. If a new CEO takes charge in a company and multiple employees go public on social media bad-mouthing him/her and vowing to obstruct everything they are trying to accomplish, they SHOULD expect repercussions. I agree, government employment should not depend on allegiance to a person, but the employees should also be expected to support the goals of the company (or government in this case), not actively fight them. It's a matter of degree.

 

[Lesh]

Like it isn't crashing and burning now, you idiot?

It is not.

“Crash and burn” is why it looked like at the end of the last Bush presidency.

Crash and burn was what it looked like at the end of the Trump presidency

Compared to that , this is pretty fucking good

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

You don’t seem to be acquainted with Godwin’s Law

Sometimes the comparison is appropriate

 

[CowboyTed]

Imagine what Trump could have got done if the government was not full of saboteurs in his first term. This is a good start to weed these people out. When a president makes policies they need to be implemented not kneecapped by traitors.

"In a normal workplace, these employees would be fired for insubordination. In the most extreme of circumstances they would be charged with sedition against the government and punished accordingly, with execution not outside the range of possibilities.


Instead, many of these conspirators—some of them dedicated socialists—were celebrated for their efforts by the Trump-Deranged media and the Democrat leaders who egged them on. But the day of reckoning may arrive with a second Trump term that offers the benefit of hindsight, having rooted them out while their guard was down.


From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to Trump’s policies, an effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House.


Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, where one top official was recently found to harbor Hamas sympathies."

Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might 'Resist' Trump | Headline USA

(Headline USA) Perhaps the biggest setback to the first Trump administration was not anything inherently flawed in Republican President Donald Trump’s leadership but the sheer bulk of disloyal individuals embedded within the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, who were eager to undermine him at every...

headlineusa.com

Hitler did the same stuff when taking over Germany...

You had to be loyal to keep your job...

I think Trump shouldgo into schools and get students to tell teachers if their parents are saying anti Trump statements at home..

 

[Mac1958]

Let's put it this way. If a new CEO takes charge in a company and multiple employees go public on social media bad-mouthing him/her and vowing to obstruct everything they are trying to accomplish, they SHOULD expect repercussions. I agree, government employment should not depend on allegiance to a person, but the employees should also be expected to support the goals of the company (or government in this case), not actively fight them. It's a matter of degree.

Blind loyalty destroys both businesses and governments.

This is authoritarianism. I will not support it, even if I agree with some of the issues.

 

[CowboyTed]

Let's put it this way. If a new CEO takes charge in a company and multiple employees go public on social media bad-mouthing him/her and vowing to obstruct everything they are trying to accomplish, they SHOULD expect repercussions. I agree, government employment should not depend on allegiance to a person, but the employees should also be expected to support the goals of the company (or government in this case), not actively fight them. It's a matter of degree.

Sorry, the US government is not a company...

The US has a constitution and laws... If the leader means to ignore or break those laws then it is there duty to speak up...

Just as an example, Trump can't order the execution his political opposition like his lawyer stated in court. That is a perfect example of why we need people who work for the US government to be loyal to the people and the law.

 

[SweetSue92]

Imagine what Trump could have got done if the government was not full of saboteurs in his first term. This is a good start to weed these people out. When a president makes policies they need to be implemented not kneecapped by traitors.

"In a normal workplace, these employees would be fired for insubordination. In the most extreme of circumstances they would be charged with sedition against the government and punished accordingly, with execution not outside the range of possibilities.


Instead, many of these conspirators—some of them dedicated socialists—were celebrated for their efforts by the Trump-Deranged media and the Democrat leaders who egged them on. But the day of reckoning may arrive with a second Trump term that offers the benefit of hindsight, having rooted them out while their guard was down.


From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to Trump’s policies, an effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House.


Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, where one top official was recently found to harbor Hamas sympathies."

Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might 'Resist' Trump | Headline USA

(Headline USA) Perhaps the biggest setback to the first Trump administration was not anything inherently flawed in Republican President Donald Trump’s leadership but the sheer bulk of disloyal individuals embedded within the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, who were eager to undermine him at every...

headlineusa.com

From what I understand, one of these big SC cases coming out this week addresses this. All these alphabet institutions are unconstitutional, of course.