Stop! Stop! I'm Tired Of Winning!!!!

[Reasonable]

Now the GOP will have to grovel to the Dems and ask for their help with doing something they couldn't do..
Sweet.

Trump is a Democrat. And he is a big donor to the biggest Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer.

Trump's family has donated more than $80,000 to Chuck Schumer

His dumb kids forgot to change their party affiliation to Republican in time to vote for their daddy in the NY primary.

The rubes have been hoaxed by Trump in every possible way.

That was before Trump realized he could con his base into thinking he could handle this job.

A huckster always follows the path of least resistance. They are very good at detecting the weaknesses in the rubes.

And the greatest weakness was the bigotry of pseudocons toward Mexicans and Muslims.

As long as Trump keeps bashing Mexicans and Muslims (and the occasional he-she), it doesn't matter to Trump's Chumps if we are still saddled with ObamaCare and a skyrocketing national debt and high taxes.

Good point. He spotted these suckers from a mile away. He probably laughed to himself what easy marks they would be..

 

[OKTexas]

Now the GOP will have to grovel to the Dems and ask for their help with doing something they couldn't do..
Sweet.

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

 

[Reasonable]

First of all, before Susan Rice requested the unmasking, she had no way of knowing who were the Americans that were involved in these conversations. So there's no way that these requests were politically motivated.

Second, when the communications indicate an American conspiring with a foreign power to commit treason, it's the NSA's responsibility to find out who those Americans are. So her request for unmasking was only her DOING HER JOB!

Wrong.

...was it the Russians who were 'hacking' the election?

Well....zero evidence for that, but now we find that it was Susan Rice and the Obamunists who we learn have violated the civil rights of Americans, in ways that never happened before Obama.


Yet, no Democrat or Democrat supporter seems upset about it. In fact, just a week ago, Susan Rice went on tv and lied about any knowledge about it. This, alone, reveals that the Obama team knew how corrupt they were and tried to hide it.


Actually, she and the rest of them organized the surveillance for over a year, before Trump even had the nomination.

AND....none of the surveillance was related in any way into the investigation into Russia, the only excuse offered for the surveillance: once more we find that, to know what the Left is doing, watch what they blame the other side for.


...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying.

You be one twisted bitch!

Surveilling Russian diplomats and agents is not only legal, but standard operation procedure.The NSA requesting the unmasking of any Americans found to be communicating with these Russians is also legal and standard operating procedure.

So despite whatever twisted delusions you are having, nothing Susan Rice did was illegal or wrong in anyway. It was her job.

You don't seem to understand the law. Unmasking is only suppose to take place where illegal activity is suspected.


.

Kinda like Trump started talking about pardoning himself when he heard Mueller was looking into his personal finances.

 

[Reasonable]

Now the GOP will have to grovel to the Dems and ask for their help with doing something they couldn't do..
Sweet.

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

You losers had 8 years to file a lawsuit. You did squat.Now that you've proven your utter incompetence you don't want Americans to have any healthcare at all?
How you can look yourself in the mirror I'll never know

 

[Reasonable]

I firmly believe it won't be built. That's not who we are as a country and the cost is exorbitant.
Put that money into education but that would make too much sense for this administration..

This is Trump. He thanked the poorly educated for voting for him. Republicans can increase their base by decreasing their IQ.

Which is why many have come out against getting a college degree. Keep the base dumb, they know they'll vote republican.

 

[Thinker101]

Now the GOP will have to grovel to the Dems and ask for their help with doing something they couldn't do..
Sweet.

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

You losers had 8 years to file a lawsuit. You did squat.Now that you've proven your utter incompetence you don't want Americans to have any healthcare at all?
How you can look yourself in the mirror I'll never know

Healthcare insurance, Obamacare provides healthcare insurance only. Most of us already know actual healthcare doesn't come with that...and with some insurance companies bailing, soon it won't include insurance.

 

[OKTexas]

Now the GOP will have to grovel to the Dems and ask for their help with doing something they couldn't do..
Sweet.

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

You losers had 8 years to file a lawsuit. You did squat.Now that you've proven your utter incompetence you don't want Americans to have any healthcare at all?
How you can look yourself in the mirror I'll never know

Didn't have a DOJ that would cooperate in those 8 years, dumb ass.


.

 

[OKTexas]

After 7 months let's count Trump's legislative achievements.
Oops.
Still at zero.
" winning."

Liar, he's signed almost 4 dozen bills into law.


.

 

[Toro]

Remember the response from the Left when Trump tweeted this?

The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017

And this....
Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump
Is it legal for a sitting President to be "wire tapping" a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!

6:49 AM - 4 Mar 2017
And this...
How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!

7:02 AM - 4 Mar 2017


Remember the uproar???? The laughter??? The accusations and demands for proof???


Today:
"White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

...discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

....they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition ...

Rice did not respond to an email seeking comment on Monday morning. Her role in requesting the identities of Trump transition officials adds an important element to the dueling investigations surrounding the Trump White House since the president's inauguration.

Last month when she was asked on the "PBS NewsHour" about reports that Trump transition officials, including Trump himself, were swept up in incidental intelligence collection, Rice said: "I know nothing about this," adding, "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that account today."
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel




"This comes in the wake of Evelyn Farkas’ television interview last month in which the former Obama deputy secretary of defense said in part: “I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”Susan Rice requested to unmask names of Trump transition officials, sources say




"Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

.... we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism."
Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon

The president and the GOP just went down to a humiliating defeat with their abortion of a healthcare bill, the Prez was reprimanded by the head of the Boy Scouts, the WH staff is tweeting about cock sucking, the WH is in total disarray, so what to do what to do.
Bring up Obama.
Oh the denial is so deep.

It's all very Presidential.

 

[OKTexas]

First of all, before Susan Rice requested the unmasking, she had no way of knowing who were the Americans that were involved in these conversations. So there's no way that these requests were politically motivated.

Second, when the communications indicate an American conspiring with a foreign power to commit treason, it's the NSA's responsibility to find out who those Americans are. So her request for unmasking was only her DOING HER JOB!

Wrong.

...was it the Russians who were 'hacking' the election?

Well....zero evidence for that, but now we find that it was Susan Rice and the Obamunists who we learn have violated the civil rights of Americans, in ways that never happened before Obama.


Yet, no Democrat or Democrat supporter seems upset about it. In fact, just a week ago, Susan Rice went on tv and lied about any knowledge about it. This, alone, reveals that the Obama team knew how corrupt they were and tried to hide it.


Actually, she and the rest of them organized the surveillance for over a year, before Trump even had the nomination.

AND....none of the surveillance was related in any way into the investigation into Russia, the only excuse offered for the surveillance: once more we find that, to know what the Left is doing, watch what they blame the other side for.


...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying.

You be one twisted bitch!

Surveilling Russian diplomats and agents is not only legal, but standard operation procedure.The NSA requesting the unmasking of any Americans found to be communicating with these Russians is also legal and standard operating procedure.

So despite whatever twisted delusions you are having, nothing Susan Rice did was illegal or wrong in anyway. It was her job.

You don't seem to understand the law. Unmasking is only suppose to take place where illegal activity is suspected.


.

We now have a better idea who's behind 'unmasking' Trump officials' contact with foreign agents — and why

National-security experts say Rice's reported requests to identify who was speaking with the foreign officials before Trump was inaugurated were neither unusual nor against the law — especially if, as Lake reported, the foreign officials being monitored were discussing "valuable political information" that required the identity of the people they were speaking to, or about, to be uncovered.

"The identities of US persons may be released under two circumstances: 1) the identity is needed to make sense of the intercept; 2) if a crime is involved in the conversation," said Robert Deitz, a former senior counselor to the CIA director and former general counsel at the National Security Agency.

"Any senior official who receives the underlying intelligence may request these identities," Deitz said, noting that while "the bar for obtaining the identity is not particularly high, it must come from a senior official, and the reason cannot simply be raw curiosity."

You should have highlighted this:

especially if, as Lake reported, the foreign officials being monitored were discussing "valuable political information"

That's not a valid reason for unmasking.


.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Obama got away with treason and sedition.

 

[CowboyTed]

Susan Rice, if you'll recall, was the National Security Advisor at the time, and in that role would've requested unmasking of names from intelligence reports all the time.

She had ZERO reason to unmask names....none other than for political purposes....she may well be indicted and convicted of gross malfeasance for it.

Well charge her... The GOP has the WH, Senate and Congress, what are ye waiting for?

Sick of this made up bullshit... The reason Rice, Clinton, Obama... are not charged is because they would be laughed out of course... You need actual evidence in court not the bullshit ye have been feeding yourself off on right wing wank sites...]

Call my bluff... Charge them, where is your guys?....

 

[Toro]

Remember when we had adults running the country the prior 240 years?

 

[radical right]

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

The DOJ doesn't have standing to file such a lawsuit.

It would get thrown out of court.

 

[OKTexas]

Actually they don't, there's more than one way to skin a cat. If the administration were willing, a law suit could be filed contesting the constitutionality of maobama care. The the DOJ could refuse to defend the law and allow for a default judgment, declaring the law unconstitutional. You GD regressives have been using that tactic for decades and what's good for the goose.....


.

The DOJ doesn't have standing to file such a lawsuit.

It would get thrown out of court.

I didn't say the DOJ would file the suit, they just won't defend the law, can you say default judgment?


.

 

[radical right]

I didn't say the DOJ would file the suit, they just won't defend the law, can you say default judgment?
.

If the solicitor general doesn't defend the suit, then the judge would pull from the mountain of amicus curiae briefs to defend it.

 

[koshergrl]

Obama got away with treason and sedition.

There is no statute of limitations, so don't lose hope.

I'm pretty sure Wasserman Schultz is headed for the pokey. I think that's where Huma's hubby and probably Huma are going as well.

I think Obama and the Clintons have about 2 years left where they can breathe the free air.

 

[OKTexas]

I didn't say the DOJ would file the suit, they just won't defend the law, can you say default judgment?
.

If the solicitor general doesn't defend the suit, then the judge would pull from the mountain of amicus curiae briefs to defend it.

The judge doesn't have that authority. All the government has to say is they agree with the plaintiff and a judgment would be entered.


.

 

[koshergrl]

Susan Rice, if you'll recall, was the National Security Advisor at the time, and in that role would've requested unmasking of names from intelligence reports all the time.

She had ZERO reason to unmask names....none other than for political purposes....she may well be indicted and convicted of gross malfeasance for it.

Well charge her... The GOP has the WH, Senate and Congress, what are ye waiting for?

Sick of this made up bullshit... The reason Rice, Clinton, Obama... are not charged is because they would be laughed out of course... You need actual evidence in court not the bullshit ye have been feeding yourself off on right wing wank sites...]

Call my bluff... Charge them, where is your guys?....

You don't charge people until you have all your duckies in a row.

You sound a little hysterical. Give it a couple of years. Your heroes are going to be warming cots in federal prison.

 

[radical right]

If the solicitor general doesn't defend the suit, then the judge would pull from the mountain of amicus curiae briefs to defend it.

The judge doesn't have that authority. All the government has to say is they agree with the plaintiff and a judgment would be entered.
.

The judge doesn't allow his court to be used. That's why they accept briefs from "friends of the court" to argue points of law the plaintiff or defendant failed to. They are there to find justice, not to referee squabbles. You can see it in action by the USSC asking the lawyers to address points from the amicus curiae briefs.