Pop23
Gold Member
WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.
Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.
You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.![]()
Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.
For whom?
The porn star that Donald Trump committed adultery with- and then had his lawyer pay off right before the election?
Who is the 'morally bankrupt' person in this equation?
The porn star that has sex with Trump?
Or the man who committed adultery with a porn star?
It's an allegation. One in which the porn stars credibilty is certainly in question, unless you think that a women who says she felt obligated to have sex with someone she didn't want to did, because she went to his room, had dinner and used his bathroom is a credible witness.
Now I've done my fair share of grocery shopping, and toilet paper ain't cheap, but if I can afford it, i'm sure the Donald can as well.
I would not want this witness on the stand on my behalf, You?