Stormy Daniels issues statement that she didn't have an affair with Trump...

[ABikerSailor]

You know, they always say it's not the incident that gets you in trouble, but rather the cover up you do on it.

On 60 Minutes last night, they showed a lot of the documents that were used, and on one of them that was addressed to Ms. Daniels, the address at the top specifically said that it was a lawyer in the Trump organization.

And, the reason the NDA wasn't signed by Trump is probably because he was not available due to campaigning, and this was a rush job.

And now? If the lawyer continues to say that he is the one who paid for it out of the goodness of his heart and close relationship with Trump, that will be viewed as an illegal in kind campaign contribution because of the subject and the timing.

If Trump pays the lawyer for the 130,000, then Trump is basically admitting that the affair happened.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

 

[hadit]

You know, they always say it's not the incident that gets you in trouble, but rather the cover up you do on it.

On 60 Minutes last night, they showed a lot of the documents that were used, and on one of them that was addressed to Ms. Daniels, the address at the top specifically said that it was a lawyer in the Trump organization.

And, the reason the NDA wasn't signed by Trump is probably because he was not available due to campaigning, and this was a rush job.

And now? If the lawyer continues to say that he is the one who paid for it out of the goodness of his heart and close relationship with Trump, that will be viewed as an illegal in kind campaign contribution because of the subject and the timing.

If Trump pays the lawyer for the 130,000, then Trump is basically admitting that the affair happened.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

Not really. Very few care if he had an affair. That ship sailed with JFK and Bubba Clinton. He didn't break any laws, and if he learned anything from Bubba, it is that he should basically say, "Yup, did it. So what?"

 

[Syriusly]

My favorite part of the entire thing was when the attorney said that it didn't matter if the evidence would stand up in court, it's what the people believe that matters.

Thus admitting the whole thing is a political ploy.

60 Minutes is now porn for the Troglocrats

All they got left now in their anti Trump arsenal is the allegations of a greedy porn star who has slept with hundreds of men, for money. Pathetic.

True

What's really stunning is that there has been no mention that she was also a Director and Producer of Porn Movies.

Google "Life after Porn", or "how porn destroyed my life" and see the countless life's destroyed by heartless Porn directors and Producers. How many women's life's did this wench destroy to make a buck?

But the left loves her, guess that's all that matters.

Feel free to name any of the lifes destroyed by her.

But remember- she is the porn start that Trump decided he should be screwing while married to his third wife.

And have his attorney paying off right before the election.

But the Right loves him, guess that is all that matters.

That's pretty lame, even for the lamest poster on this board.

Hey you were the one that accused Stormy Daniels of destroying peoples lives- without a shred of evidence.

That is not only lame- but very Trumpian.

 

[Syriusly]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

 

[jillian]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

to trumptards, the fact that they gave her $130,000 doesn't tell you it did, moron?

 

[Pop23]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

 

[Indeependent]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

to trumptards, the fact that they gave her $130,000 doesn't tell you it did, moron?

Does it bother you that the now deceased, ultra-liberal Hugh Hefner, forced his hundreds of playmate sex toys to sign non-disclosure “fuck on command” agreements?

 

[Syriusly]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

I don't watch porn- I find it boring.

On the otherhand our President likes to have sex with porn stars.

It's what porn addicts do.

 

[Syriusly]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

to trumptards, the fact that they gave her $130,000 doesn't tell you it did, moron?

Does it bother you that the now deceased, ultra-liberal Hugh Hefner, forced his hundreds of playmate sex toys to sign non-disclosure “fuck on command” agreements?

'fuck on command' agreements? LOL

Any such agreement would be illegal and unenforceable.

Did Hefner ever ask any of them to sign an NDA 10 years later- right before his Presidential election?

 

[Indeependent]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

to trumptards, the fact that they gave her $130,000 doesn't tell you it did, moron?

Does it bother you that the now deceased, ultra-liberal Hugh Hefner, forced his hundreds of playmate sex toys to sign non-disclosure “fuck on command” agreements?

'fuck on command' agreements? LOL

Any such agreement would be illegal and unenforceable.

Did Hefner ever ask any of them to sign an NDA 10 years later- right before his Presidential election?

You obviously never watched or read any of the sleeze bags interviews.

 

[Indeependent]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

I don't watch porn- I find it boring.

On the otherhand our President likes to have sex with porn stars.

It's what porn addicts do.

If Trump had sex with that ugly dog I may not vote for him again.

 

[Faun]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

 

[Pop23]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

 

[Faun]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

I'm doing well, thank you.

Now how about answering my question...?

 

[Pop23]

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

I'm doing well, thank you.

Now how about answering my question...?

About defending porn?

Go ahead, defend it all you want, I wont stop you. It's obvious you folks see those involved as increadibly trust worthy.

 

[Faun]

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

I'm doing well, thank you.

Now how about answering my question...?

About defending porn?

Go ahead, defend it all you want, I wont stop you. It's obvious you folks see those involved as increadibly trust worthy.

I see you're brain still doesn't function. How sad.

Let's see if a refresher this helps ya...

Syriusly: Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

Pop23: You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.​

So what did Syriusly say that your addled brain translated into him defending porn?

 

[Syriusly]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

No, but to any rational person, the $130,000 pay off is the proof they really did have sex.

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

For whom?

The porn star that Donald Trump committed adultery with- and then had his lawyer pay off right before the election?

Who is the 'morally bankrupt' person in this equation?

The porn star that has sex with Trump?
Or the man who committed adultery with a porn star?

 

[Faun]

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

I'm doing well, thank you.

Now how about answering my question...?

About defending porn?

Go ahead, defend it all you want, I wont stop you. It's obvious you folks see those involved as increadibly trust worthy.

I see you're brain still doesn't function. How sad.

Let's see if a refresher this helps ya...

Syriusly: Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

Pop23: You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.​

So what did Syriusly say that your addled brain translated into him defending porn?

tappity-tap-tap

 

[Syriusly]

To democrats this is proof that they really did have an affair.

to trumptards, the fact that they gave her $130,000 doesn't tell you it did, moron?

Does it bother you that the now deceased, ultra-liberal Hugh Hefner, forced his hundreds of playmate sex toys to sign non-disclosure “fuck on command” agreements?

'fuck on command' agreements? LOL

Any such agreement would be illegal and unenforceable.

Did Hefner ever ask any of them to sign an NDA 10 years later- right before his Presidential election?

You obviously never watched or read any of the sleeze bags interviews.

I have indeed watched a few of that sleezebag Trumps interviews....

 

[Syriusly]

Well when the agreement specifically says that no video's or recordings of what supposedly didn't happen, can be released, that is rather indicative that it did happen.

You go right ahead and defend porn. It's what porn addicts do.

WTF did he write that your deformed brain translated into defending porn?

Faun! How ya been. Here to defend the admittedly morally bankrupt porn star as well! They need your help buddy, it ain't going well for em.

I'm doing well, thank you.

Now how about answering my question...?

About defending porn?

Go ahead, defend it all you want, I wont stop you. It's obvious you folks see those involved as increadibly trust worthy.

LOL.....while speaking about the President involved with the porn star.....