Stormy Daniels issues statement that she didn't have an affair with Trump...

No judge is going to do that... the problem is, since Trump didn't sign the agreement, she has no agreement with Trump.

This is black letter law.

Funny, a lot of liberals thought the same thing in the 1990's when the media became All Lewinsky, All the Time.

Does the word "Hoist on your own Petard" mean anything to you?
Judges are familiar with and rule on NDA agreements and contracts all the time. What makes you think this court sanctioned NDA will not be enforced and there will not be financial penalties for the violations by stormy and her attorney?

She agreed to a financial settlement over an affair she claims happened..............which is very possible...........

She signed court documents and took the money.........

She then saw an opportunity to make more money........

Where in lies the crime if she had sex with Trump..........If it was consensual sex no crime was committed at all.............except that Trump cheated on his wife.............which is not a crime.............

This is a gold digging moment for her, and is a violation of a court order.

Maybe she is in violation of a court order. Maybe she isn't.

Doesn't change that know we know that there is a pattern of Trump having elicit affairs- and then having his 'friends' pay them off- to be quiet- when he was running for President.

Remember neither of the two payoffs happened after the affairs ended- they happened when Trump was running for office. Which strongly implies that they were done for political purposes- which means they may have been illegal campaign contributions- which is a crime.
How do you classify an NDA agreement as a campaign contribution.............please explain

popcorn_jon_stewart.gif

You’re not very bright.

They hushed her up becaise they didn’t want it coming out before the election.

It cost $130,000 to make that happen. The lawyer paid the money ostensibly. Thus he made a payment in furtherance of an election advantage which exceeded campaign finance limitations and was not reported.

I hope that helps given that is at least the fifth time it has been explained to you
For not being so bright I can at least count.........haven't seen you explain it 5 times............

Riddle me this....................did Stormy come to Trump and say pay me money or I'll tell the world we had sex in Lake Tahoe and screw up your marriage...................Did she do it for PROFIT or EXTORSION..............Did she ever accuse him of a crime back then like Rape................because I don't see it..............Please show that documented proof...........


Extortion (also called shakedown, outwrestling and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion. It is sometimes euphemistically referred to as a "protection racket" since the racketeers often phrase their demands as payment for "protection" from (real or hypothetical) threats from unspecified other parties; though often, and almost always, the person or organization offering "protection" is the same one willing to cause harm if the money is not paid, and such is implied in the "protection" offer. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence which refers to a requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence is sufficient to commit the offense. Exaction refers not only to extortion or the demanding and obtaining of something through force,[1] but additionally, in its formal definition, means the infliction of something such as pain and suffering or making somebody endure something unpleasant.[2]
 
Extortion (also called shakedown, outwrestling and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion. It is sometimes euphemistically referred to as a "protection racket" since the racketeers often phrase their demands as payment for "protection" from (real or hypothetical) threats from unspecified other parties; though often, and almost always, the person or organization offering "protection" is the same one willing to cause harm if the money is not paid, and such is implied in the "protection" offer. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence which refers to a requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence is sufficient to commit the offense. Exaction refers not only to extortion or the demanding and obtaining of something through force,[1] but additionally, in its formal definition, means the infliction of something such as pain and suffering or making somebody endure something unpleasant.[2]


The Stormy Daniels nonsense is just more effort to embarrass Trump by the usual retards in the media who had absolutely nothing to say about President Clinton screwing an intern in the oval office simply because they liked him and he is a Democrat.

It is not but a collosal pile of horse manure and probably the best response is to laugh in their faces lol
 
What can we expect, she's a porn actress, which means if she sells her body for money, then LYING in order to get even more $$$ would surely be easier for her.

Let's be realistic here, just go on any porn website (which I go to only for the articles) and type "stormy daniels" in the search bar and you will see hundreds of films showing her fucking blacks, whites, and any number of well endowed men. To be honest she's much uglier on film than she is in pictures.

And this is the left's "credible witness" to Trump's "wrongdoings" and a symbol of the left's Me Too bowel movement. A fucking sleazebag whore working in an industry that denigrates and demeans women. This is how pathetic and desperate the left and the crooked media have gotten.

Ya gotta love it!

Two women have come forward now- both were paid off to keep quiet about their affairs with Trump while he was married.

I know to the Trumpsters- anyone who says anything they don't like is a liar- but Trump's friends sure were willing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep these women quiet.

Why does a billionaire need others to pay off his sexual partners?
Women who had consensual sex (knowing he was married) and got paid off to not cause harm to his reputation, and his wife and family. Oh the horror. Congratulations Democrats, your hero is now a porn star who fucks big black corks for a living. .
j

I am hoping we don't find out either the color or the size of Donnie's cock.

But congratulations- your hero is now a man who likes to cheat on his wife with porn stars and have convenient friends pay them off to keep them quiet.
He will indeed go down as a visionary Churchill like figure who saved the country t.

LOL.......the only thing he has in common with Churchill is the width of his waist.

Meanwhile you will wait on his every tweet to see what direction his 'vision' will blow today.
His vision is in line with what most Americans have been thinking, for too long our corrupt politicians have been selling our country and its interests down the river.
 
Judges are familiar with and rule on NDA agreements and contracts all the time. What makes you think this court sanctioned NDA will not be enforced and there will not be financial penalties for the violations by stormy and her attorney?

She agreed to a financial settlement over an affair she claims happened..............which is very possible...........

She signed court documents and took the money.........

She then saw an opportunity to make more money........

Where in lies the crime if she had sex with Trump..........If it was consensual sex no crime was committed at all.............except that Trump cheated on his wife.............which is not a crime.............

This is a gold digging moment for her, and is a violation of a court order.

Maybe she is in violation of a court order. Maybe she isn't.

Doesn't change that know we know that there is a pattern of Trump having elicit affairs- and then having his 'friends' pay them off- to be quiet- when he was running for President.

Remember neither of the two payoffs happened after the affairs ended- they happened when Trump was running for office. Which strongly implies that they were done for political purposes- which means they may have been illegal campaign contributions- which is a crime.
How do you classify an NDA agreement as a campaign contribution.............please explain

popcorn_jon_stewart.gif

You’re not very bright.

They hushed her up becaise they didn’t want it coming out before the election.

It cost $130,000 to make that happen. The lawyer paid the money ostensibly. Thus he made a payment in furtherance of an election advantage which exceeded campaign finance limitations and was not reported.

I hope that helps given that is at least the fifth time it has been explained to you
For not being so bright I can at least count.........haven't seen you explain it 5 times............

Riddle me this....................did Stormy come to Trump and say pay me money or I'll tell the world we had sex in Lake Tahoe and screw up your marriage...................Did she do it for PROFIT or EXTORSION..............Did she ever accuse him of a crime back then like Rape................because I don't see it..............Please show that documented proof...........


Extortion (also called shakedown, outwrestling and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion. It is sometimes euphemistically referred to as a "protection racket" since the racketeers often phrase their demands as payment for "protection" from (real or hypothetical) threats from unspecified other parties; though often, and almost always, the person or organization offering "protection" is the same one willing to cause harm if the money is not paid, and such is implied in the "protection" offer. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence which refers to a requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence is sufficient to commit the offense. Exaction refers not only to extortion or the demanding and obtaining of something through force,[1] but additionally, in its formal definition, means the infliction of something such as pain and suffering or making somebody endure something unpleasant.[2]

I love when uneducated half wits insult my intelligence. insults from trumptards are validating.

but I'm not going to entertain your nonsense anymore. you've been answered.

there is no extortion here.

trumpscum are too funny.
 
I just wonder how much the DNC paid this woman to break her NDA.

Does she get to claim all her lawyer fees as a business expense? Fucking guys is legit her job after all...

I think you are missing the big picture here...

Someone who ran as the leader of the "Party of Family Values" fucked a porn star, and then paid her $130,000 to keep quiet about it because right after the Pussy-Grabbing tape came out, they thought that would end his campaign.

If it was a legit payment for fucking her, why try to hide it?
And someone who ran as the Democratic nominee has a history of attacking women who accuse her husband of rape and assault.

And someone who ran as the Republican nominee who has a history of attacking women- and brags of grabbing them by their pussies.
Two women have come forward have admitted the relationships were consensual. The rest are paid by Democratic operative dirt diggers.

How typically Trumpian- attack every one of Trump's victims by lying that they were paid to testify by the Democrats.

What we do know is that Trump's former mistresses were paid not to talk by Trump operatives- during his Presidential run.
Fact, Democrat operatives from WAPO hit the ground in Alabama with lucrative rewards for anybody that comes forward with claims about the judge, regardless of how long ago it was. Same scumbags have been at work before Trump got elected and after. American public are on to their tactics.

Speaking of attacking victims, isn't that what crooked Hillary did to Bill's victims?

Another case of Leftwing faux outrage.
 
Jay-Em-Submissive-Husband-Public-Spanking.jpg


She said she spanked Trump. Her "spank" account must be bigger than his. Because his hands are smaller.
 
How much does Anderson Cooper have a vendetta against our president, though?
Cooper is a fag queen.
Stormy, the porn star who would fuck a donkey for ten bucks has turned out to be a 'dry hole' for the Trump haters.
She claims to have banged Trump ONCE. Is one time a "affair"? Then she claimed three times in writing she never had an "affair" with Trump then she claims she was lying then she claims she is now telling the truth.
I think there's a holstein dairy farm looking for a pair of udders.
 
I think you are missing the big picture here...

Someone who ran as the leader of the "Party of Family Values" fucked a porn star, and then paid her $130,000 to keep quiet about it because right after the Pussy-Grabbing tape came out, they thought that would end his campaign.

If it was a legit payment for fucking her, why try to hide it?
And someone who ran as the Democratic nominee has a history of attacking women who accuse her husband of rape and assault.

And someone who ran as the Republican nominee who has a history of attacking women- and brags of grabbing them by their pussies.
Two women have come forward have admitted the relationships were consensual. The rest are paid by Democratic operative dirt diggers.

How typically Trumpian- attack every one of Trump's victims by lying that they were paid to testify by the Democrats.

What we do know is that Trump's former mistresses were paid not to talk by Trump operatives- during his Presidential run.
Fact, Democrat operatives from WAPO hit the ground in Alabama with lucrative rewards for anybody that comes forward with claims about the judge, regardless of how long ago it was.

Fact- you are just parroting the claims made by Moore.

Fact- Republican operatives approached some of the victims and offered them money to say that they made it all up.

Fact- Trumpsters will smear anyone in order to protect your Dear Leader.
 
Two women have come forward now- both were paid off to keep quiet about their affairs with Trump while he was married.

I know to the Trumpsters- anyone who says anything they don't like is a liar- but Trump's friends sure were willing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep these women quiet.

Why does a billionaire need others to pay off his sexual partners?
Women who had consensual sex (knowing he was married) and got paid off to not cause harm to his reputation, and his wife and family. Oh the horror. Congratulations Democrats, your hero is now a porn star who fucks big black corks for a living. .
j

I am hoping we don't find out either the color or the size of Donnie's cock.

But congratulations- your hero is now a man who likes to cheat on his wife with porn stars and have convenient friends pay them off to keep them quiet.
He will indeed go down as a visionary Churchill like figure who saved the country t.

LOL.......the only thing he has in common with Churchill is the width of his waist.

Meanwhile you will wait on his every tweet to see what direction his 'vision' will blow today.
His vision is in line with what most Americans have been thinking, for too long our corrupt politicians have been selling our country and its interests down the river.

His vision is in line with what a minority of Americans are thinking- of course your minority is fine with a corrupt politician selling our country out for his own profit- as long as he is Trump.
 
Bottom line is she signed it and the rest is speculation. The whore is now seeing an opportunity to make more money so she's trying to reneg in a contract. She and her thug attorney won't be as cocky when the judge finds her in violation and slaps her with a 20 million dollar judgement.

No judge is going to do that... the problem is, since Trump didn't sign the agreement, she has no agreement with Trump.

This is black letter law.

Are the perv Fake News agents so desperate about that celebrity Trump gossip?

Funny, a lot of liberals thought the same thing in the 1990's when the media became All Lewinsky, All the Time.

Does the word "Hoist on your own Petard" mean anything to you?
Judges are familiar with and rule on NDA agreements and contracts all the time. What makes you think this court sanctioned NDA will not be enforced and there will not be financial penalties for the violations by stormy and her attorney?

She agreed to a financial settlement over an affair she claims happened..............which is very possible...........

She signed court documents and took the money.........

She then saw an opportunity to make more money........

Where in lies the crime if she had sex with Trump..........If it was consensual sex no crime was committed at all.............except that Trump cheated on his wife.............which is not a crime.............

This is a gold digging moment for her, and is a violation of a court order.

Maybe she is in violation of a court order. Maybe she isn't.

Doesn't change that know we know that there is a pattern of Trump having elicit affairs- and then having his 'friends' pay them off- to be quiet- when he was running for President.

Remember neither of the two payoffs happened after the affairs ended- they happened when Trump was running for office. Which strongly implies that they were done for political purposes- which means they may have been illegal campaign contributions- which is a crime.
How do you classify an NDA agreement as a campaign contribution.............please explain

Payment To Stormy Daniels May Have Broken Campaign Finance Law
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So what election laws are we talking about being potentially broken?

NOBLE: We're talking about campaign finance laws and the contribution limits and disclosure provisions. If Michael Cohen paid Stormy Daniels, and it was done for the purpose of stopping her to talk about this during the election, then it was an excessive contribution by Michael Cohen. And the campaign should have reported it as a contribution by Cohen and as an expenditure by the campaign. The question here is, was this related to the election? And I think there's strong evidence it was.

NOBLE: Right. His limit would have been $2,700. Now, a couple of things have had to have happened. One is the campaign either had to know about it or he had to be an agent of the campaign. Frankly, it's hard to believe that Donald Trump did not know about this, so the campaign did not know about this. And the second thing to keep in mind is we talk about Michael Cohen paying for it. We actually don't know the source of the money. What they have said is that the campaign did not pay for it. And the Trump Organization did not pay for it. And Michael Cohen facilitated the payment - and that he took the money from his home equity loan. One suspects - and there's been some evidence of this - that he expected to get repaid by somebody. Whether he did or not, we don't know.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: But if he's saying that it's his personal funds, does that make a difference?

NOBLE: Well, it makes a difference in the sense that, if it was his personal funds, it was an individual campaign contribution. If it came from another company or if it did come from the Trump Organization, it was a prohibited contribution. And we don't know what the source could have been. The source could have been another company, could have been another individual. We just don't know. And one of the purposes of the campaign finance laws to allow us to know where the campaigns are getting financed.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Let's talk a little bit about this idea of it being 11 days before the election. Why is that so important?

NOBLE: It suggests that the election was on their mind. Now, she allegedly had the affair about 10 years before. There was a potential article that was going to come out in 2011. But they did not enter the agreement until right before the election. And that is evidence that the purpose of this was for the purpose of influencing the election.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: And if that is the case, why is that problematic?

NOBLE: If it's for the purpose of influencing the election, the federal campaign finance laws come into play.
 
My favorite part of the entire thing was when the attorney said that it didn't matter if the evidence would stand up in court, it's what the people believe that matters.

Thus admitting the whole thing is a political ploy.
 
I think you are missing the big picture here...

Someone who ran as the leader of the "Party of Family Values" fucked a porn star, and then paid her $130,000 to keep quiet about it because right after the Pussy-Grabbing tape came out, they thought that would end his campaign.

If it was a legit payment for fucking her, why try to hide it?
And someone who ran as the Democratic nominee has a history of attacking women who accuse her husband of rape and assault.

And someone who ran as the Republican nominee who has a history of attacking women- and brags of grabbing them by their pussies.
Two women have come forward have admitted the relationships were consensual. The rest are paid by Democratic operative dirt diggers.

How typically Trumpian- attack every one of Trump's victims by lying that they were paid to testify by the Democrats.

What we do know is that Trump's former mistresses were paid not to talk by Trump operatives- during his Presidential run.
Not attacking the porn star. Just common sense when there's a Juanita Broddrick and this porn star named Stormy getting paid by Jimmy Kimmel.

You are somewhat confused.

The porn start Trump had sex with was paid off to keep quiet by Trump's attorney.
 

Forum List

Back
Top