ST's BP Rantings

Last edited:
Help what? :cuckoo:

Clearly, we are all LIARS!

Which leads us neatly to the conclusion that Curve is actually truthmatters' sock puppet. :eek::eek:


You're a hypocrite because you make claims you refuse to support. Keep whining you raggedy ****.

I don't need to support my profession. It's not a forum topic. You made it a topic - you raised the topic, you back up your stance.

You're making a total fool of yourself.... Jeeez, even I'm embarrassed for you and I think you're a total fool. You keep on and on and on like a child wanting candy.
 
Help what? :cuckoo:

Clearly, we are all LIARS!

Which leads us neatly to the conclusion that Curve is actually truthmatters' sock puppet. :eek::eek:


You're a hypocrite because you make claims you refuse to support. Keep whining you raggedy ****.
I really don't think she cares whether you buy it or not. My use of the term 'of no consequence' would be a clue to that. But, go figure how obvious clues are lost on the brain damaged.
 
Help what? :cuckoo:

Clearly, we are all LIARS!

Which leads us neatly to the conclusion that Curve is actually truthmatters' sock puppet. :eek::eek:


You're a hypocrite because you make claims you refuse to support. Keep whining you raggedy ****.

Who the fuck are you, asshole?

Why don't you provide YOUR real name and address for the boards? Prove you're not some 13 year old fat kid in his mom's basement eating Cheetos and Mountain Dew hoping you don't get caught wacking off to the Sears catalog?

She doesn't have to produce anything with her name on it to prove to some keyboard commando on a message board that she does what she says... Credibility comes in many forms...

Damn, you're fucking stupid...
 
Clearly, we are all LIARS!

Which leads us neatly to the conclusion that Curve is actually truthmatters' sock puppet. :eek::eek:


You're a hypocrite because you make claims you refuse to support. Keep whining you raggedy ****.

Who the fuck are you, asshole?

Why don't you provide YOUR real name and address for the boards? Prove you're not some 13 year old fat kid in his mom's basement eating Cheetos and Mountain Dew hoping you don't get caught wacking off to the Sears catalog?

She doesn't have to produce anything with her name on it to prove to some keyboard commando on a message board that she does what she says... Credibility comes in many forms...

Damn, you're fucking stupid...

In point of fact, I just want to state for the record.. After reading some of curvelights posts, curvelight is most likely NOT a published writer and IS most likely a 13 year old cheetoh junky...... okay carry on...:lol:
 
Clearly, we are all LIARS!

Which leads us neatly to the conclusion that Curve is actually truthmatters' sock puppet. :eek::eek:


You're a hypocrite because you make claims you refuse to support. Keep whining you raggedy ****.
hey dipshit, tell us again how you can drive faster than your cell phone coverage

I can run faster than that... Don't believe me? Watch how fast I run to the elevator and back... Ready... GO!....... huff, pant... See that?
 
A Washington-based research group says two BP refineries in the U.S. account for 97 percent of "egregious willful" violations given by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

BP refineries account for most violations, study reports | NOLA.com


That might be so, but I would bet they also own and operate by far the largest percentage of wells.
I would be wrong. I looked for that info but couldn't find it.

So what if they did? The article is about safety violations at refineries, not wells.
 
A Washington-based research group says two BP refineries in the U.S. account for 97 percent of "egregious willful" violations given by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

BP refineries account for most violations, study reports | NOLA.com

From the article: Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA David Michaels says similar problems are pervasive throughout the U.S. petroleum industry.


So you take that to mean that BP isn't the only company with 97% of all refinery violations?
 
Anyone watch 60 Minutes last night?

Seems that there were MANY things that went wrong. The actuator was torn up, the blowout preventer was faulty, and the battery for the thing was only at 1/2 power.

Combine that with the fact that they told them to pull out the drilling mud FIRST and then run the tests, well.......that combined with the previous stuff led to this disaster.

Interestingly enough, the reason the mud was pulled out before testing the blowout preventers was because it was faster. I guess the BP execs wanted to seal the well quick so that they could have their 7 years without an accident ceremony and be on their way.

The guy they interviewed (who was in the middle of the shit when it hit the fan and one of the last ones off the rig), said that when the actuator rubber pieces were brought to their attention, they were told to not worry about it, it was okay.

Then, when they were going to test then pull out the mud (according to the interviewee), he stated that it was a BP executive who gave the order to pull the mud out first, then test, because the drillers wanted to do it with the mud still in, as it was a safety measure.

Nope, BP, Trans Oceanic and Halliburton all contributed equally to this major league fiasco, all should pay for it equally, 1/3 EACH.

Hopefully all of them will go out of business, we don't need shitty workmanship like this doing dangerous stuff like that.

As far as the Cali Twit publishing argument?

Well, she's stated she's published, but didn't say how. Si Moron also stated that she's read some of Cali Twit's stuff, which is supposedly for a very select audience who is all in contact with each other.

Wanna know where she's "published"? As the subject of an ongoing study of mental illness. Apparently Si Moron is in the same test group.

Or......it could be she's "published" by that famous company......you know.......USMB Random House?
 
Last edited:


That might be so, but I would bet they also own and operate by far the largest percentage of wells.
I would be wrong. I looked for that info but couldn't find it.

So what if they did? The article is about safety violations at refineries, not wells.

SO what does "egregious willful" mean in this instance?

Want me to tell you? Sure ya do... It means of the violations reported they think BP had the most of the worst, or of the worst violations reported they think BP had 97% of them.... Most of the worst.... THink about that now.... Most of the worst....

What does that mean? Well it means nothing really. its just a slick way to make an apparent accusation without actually having to back it up... that is classic double speak and propaganda without having to prove any claims made....

I checked the NOLA source for that and we get George Soros's Center for Public Integrity website... Well George may not own it but he funds them just the same.... So you got a left wing "tell ya who is a good guy and who isn't " site telling us that BP is a bad guy..... Wow big shock.....:lol:
 
....
As far as the Cali Twit publishing argument?

Well, she's stated she's published, but didn't say how. Si Moron also stated that she's read some of Cali Twit's stuff, which is supposedly for a very select audience who is all in contact with each other.

Wanna know where she's "published"? As the subject of an ongoing study of mental illness. Apparently Si Moron is in the same test group.

Or......it could be she's "published" by that famous company......you know.......USMB Random House?
Of no consequence.

(Let's see............. LMAO!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top