ST's BP Rantings

[SpidermanTuba]

Once again you have failed....Look up the MSDS sheet on the chemical on line and read it...hmmmmmm...thought someone with extensive lab experience would know what a goddam MSDS sheet is....Hmmmmmmmmmmmm....but since you are apparently incapable of rational thought and a fan of knee jerk reactionary thinking I will provide it for all to see.
http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/posted/2931/Corexit_EC9527A_MSDS.539295.pdf

I know what an MSDS sheet is, thanks. After you get over your amazement with yourself, please explain why you brought it up.

You claimed BP is stealing the clothing of clean up workers for no good reason...I slapped you back into reality and you can't figure why I posted the MSDS sheet clearly stating the chemicals present require decontaminating people with prolonged exposure???

Dude...I hope none of your professors read this board...you will end up with a Doctarate in Dumbassedness.

From the sheet you posted:

OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CFR 1910.1200 :
Based on our hazard evaluation, none of the substances in this product are hazardous.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Where does it say to confiscate contaminated clothing and never return it to the owner?

oh, you've got me there. there's no mention of it on the MSDS sheet. good for you.

unfortunately, your own link points out that BP was following OSHA regulations:

"BP spokesman John Curry declined to comment on pending litigation, but it appears that BP was simply following federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, which require decontamination of people working in hazardous materials zones and proper collection and disposal of their protective clothing."

BP clashes with critics on Gulf of Mexico oil crisis response | NOLA.com



dope

Just imagine the hysterical rants that we'd have from Whinyman if BP did not follow OSHA. It appears that, to Whinyman, whatever BP does he will criticize and whine about. He's funny.

CaliforniaGirl, please show me the federal law or OSHA rule that requires confiscation of clothing contaminated by a substance that according to OSHA, is not hazardous.


Thanks.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

I know what an MSDS sheet is, thanks. After you get over your amazement with yourself, please explain why you brought it up.

You claimed BP is stealing the clothing of clean up workers for no good reason...I slapped you back into reality and you can't figure why I posted the MSDS sheet clearly stating the chemicals present require decontaminating people with prolonged exposure???

Dude...I hope none of your professors read this board...you will end up with a Doctarate in Dumbassedness.

From the sheet you posted:

OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CFR 1910.1200 :
Based on our hazard evaluation, none of the substances in this product are hazardous.

Read section 3 on the first page.....

 

[Gunny]

A fisherman, who was among nine cleanup workers airlifted to New Orleans-area hospitals with signs of illness last week, filed a complaint in federal court Sunday alleging that BP made him take a decontamination shower and confiscated his clothes before he entered West Jefferson Medical Center. The fisherman, James Wunstell of Galliano, is asking a federal judge to order BP to stop taking items that could provide evidence of the dispersants' toxic effect.

"At West Jefferson, there were tents set up outside the hospital, where I was stripped of my clothing, washed with water and several showers, before I was allowed into the hospital," said Wunstell in a sworn statement from his hospital bed Saturday. "When I asked for my clothing, I was told that BP had confiscated my clothing and it would not be returned."

BP clashes with critics on Gulf of Mexico oil crisis response | NOLA.com

Sensationalize much?

 

[California Girl]

A fisherman, who was among nine cleanup workers airlifted to New Orleans-area hospitals with signs of illness last week, filed a complaint in federal court Sunday alleging that BP made him take a decontamination shower and confiscated his clothes before he entered West Jefferson Medical Center. The fisherman, James Wunstell of Galliano, is asking a federal judge to order BP to stop taking items that could provide evidence of the dispersants' toxic effect.

"At West Jefferson, there were tents set up outside the hospital, where I was stripped of my clothing, washed with water and several showers, before I was allowed into the hospital," said Wunstell in a sworn statement from his hospital bed Saturday. "When I asked for my clothing, I was told that BP had confiscated my clothing and it would not be returned."

BP clashes with critics on Gulf of Mexico oil crisis response | NOLA.com

Sensationalize much?

You better be able to back that shit up, Gunny.


Oh wait..... yea...... I see how you formed that opinion.... based on the vast amount of hysterical ranting posts, right?

 

[SpidermanTuba]

You claimed BP is stealing the clothing of clean up workers for no good reason...I slapped you back into reality and you can't figure why I posted the MSDS sheet clearly stating the chemicals present require decontaminating people with prolonged exposure???

Dude...I hope none of your professors read this board...you will end up with a Doctarate in Dumbassedness.

From the sheet you posted:

OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CFR 1910.1200 :
Based on our hazard evaluation, none of the substances in this product are hazardous.

Read section 3 on the first page.....

OK. Done. How does that change my original point? Like I said...Corexit isn't on the federal list of hazardous substances - at least not as far as OSHA is concerned.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

BP clashes with critics on Gulf of Mexico oil crisis response | NOLA.com

Sensationalize much?

You better be able to back that shit up, Gunny.


Oh wait..... yea...... I see how you formed that opinion.... based on the vast amount of hysterical ranting posts, right?

CaliforniaGirl, please show me the federal law or OSHA rule that requires confiscation of clothing contaminated by a substance that according to OSHA, is not hazardous.

 

[xotoxi]

BP now stealing shirts off of fishermans backs - literally, not kidding

I wonder if Neubarth is a fisherman...

I wonder if Spiderman Tuba will ever stop whining.

I like his BP logo dipped in chocolate.

Makes me hungry.

 

[del]

Where does it say to confiscate contaminated clothing and never return it to the owner?

oh, you've got me there. there's no mention of it on the MSDS sheet. good for you.

unfortunately, your own link points out that BP was following OSHA regulations:

"BP spokesman John Curry declined to comment on pending litigation, but it appears that BP was simply following federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, which require decontamination of people working in hazardous materials zones and proper collection and disposal of their protective clothing."

BP clashes with critics on Gulf of Mexico oil crisis response | NOLA.com



dope

OSHA does not require decontamination for Corexit. In fact, if you read the MSDS sheet that dickface linked a few pages ago, you'd see OSHA doesn't consider Corexit hazardous.

OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CFR 1910.1200 :
Based on our hazard evaluation, none of the substances in this product are hazardous.

So why is BP decontaminating people from something neither they nor OSHA thinks is hazardous?


Its interesting how you take any word from a BP officials mouth as truth - simply because its coming from a mega-corporations mouth. What reason would they have to lie?

it's interesting how you're so busy frothing at the mouth in righteous indignation that it completely prevents you from reading for comprehension.

have someone read what i quoted to you, especially the part about the BP spokesman declining to comment. if you had the brains god gave a goat, you would then realize that it was the reporter's conclusion that BP was following OSHA guidelines. therefore, you should properly address your question to the reporter, not me.

what reason does he have to lie?

nitwit

 

[DiamondDave]

Yet OIL, which is indeed handled under hazmat... and requires DECONTAMINATION

 

[editec]

Nobody who was working in that gook is going to have difficulty proving that they were contaminated by that toxic substance, not even if BP stole their shirts.

The oil that contaminated their shirts is the same oil that is abundantly spreading over thousands of miles of ocean and coast.

Finding samples of it should prove to be no problem, not even for the lawyers of those fisherman who were contaminated.

 

[DiamondDave]

Training Marine Oil Spill Response Workers under OSHA's Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard

 

[California Girl]

Nobody who was working in that gook is going to have difficulty proving that they were contaminated by that toxic substance, not even if BP stole their shirts.

The oil that contaminated their shirts is the same oil that is abundantly spreading over thousands of miles of ocean and coast.

Finding samples of it should prove to be no problem, not even for the lawyers of those fisherman who were contaminated.

Did you duck?

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Yet OIL, which is indeed handled under hazmat... and requires DECONTAMINATION

I used to inspect petro barges. I got oil and worse on my clothing on more than one occasion. I never had my clothing confiscated and destroyed on account of it.

 

[DiamondDave]

Yet OIL, which is indeed handled under hazmat... and requires DECONTAMINATION

I used to inspect petro barges. I got oil and worse on my clothing on more than one occasion. I never had my clothing confiscated and destroyed on account of it.

And I have had exposure to bad stuff as well... but there are indeed hazmat procedures specifically involving large level crude oil spills

You are simply looking for any way to continue your delusional BP rant

You need serious mental help

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Yet OIL, which is indeed handled under hazmat... and requires DECONTAMINATION

I used to inspect petro barges. I got oil and worse on my clothing on more than one occasion. I never had my clothing confiscated and destroyed on account of it.

Well..that obviously explains your chemically induced diminished mental capacity...I hope you saved samples for the lawsuit.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Yet OIL, which is indeed handled under hazmat... and requires DECONTAMINATION

I used to inspect petro barges. I got oil and worse on my clothing on more than one occasion. I never had my clothing confiscated and destroyed on account of it.

And I have had exposure to bad stuff as well... but there are indeed hazmat procedures specifically involving large level crude oil spills

You are simply looking for any way to continue your delusional BP rant

You need serious mental help

Says here:

Wear insulating gloves and protective clothing
when contact with skin may occur. Wash with
soap and water before eating, drinking or
smoking. Launder contaminated clothing before
reuse.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...AdWix42hL_nB2tiRQ&sig2=J7RbXxf05hK5P8RP3gQkjg

Doesn't say destroy. Says launder.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

It's cheaper to destroy than launder

 

[SpidermanTuba]

It's cheaper to destroy than launder

As far as the undergarments go, you bet its cheaper for BP, BP didn't pay for those!

Brilliant analysis Patek. Though I don't see how its right for BP to be destroying the clothing of the fisherman they are fucking over because its cheaper for BP.

 

[DiamondDave]

I used to inspect petro barges. I got oil and worse on my clothing on more than one occasion. I never had my clothing confiscated and destroyed on account of it.

And I have had exposure to bad stuff as well... but there are indeed hazmat procedures specifically involving large level crude oil spills

You are simply looking for any way to continue your delusional BP rant

You need serious mental help

Says here:

Wear insulating gloves and protective clothing
when contact with skin may occur. Wash with
soap and water before eating, drinking or
smoking. Launder contaminated clothing before
reuse.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...AdWix42hL_nB2tiRQ&sig2=J7RbXxf05hK5P8RP3gQkjg

Doesn't say destroy. Says launder.

Nice try

Protective clothing and equipment must be decontaminated, cleaned, laundered, maintained, or replaced to retain effectiveness.

OSHA 3114 - Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response

But we know you'll continue on your BP Derangement Syndrome anyway