Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There have been numerous medical success's using adult stem cells for treatment.
Can anybody provide a link to show successful medical treatments that used embryonic or fetal stem cells?
I'm starting to think science should focus on what works.
quote fro m Lopettaa
Quote:
As many people know, stem cells are important. They can be obtained from the placenta and umbilical cord after birth. It is effective because immune system will not reject our own stem cells.
My nephew was born in July. My sister was question about preserving the stem cells as they can be frozen over a period of time. She had this process done. Then she share the reason she did this to me.
The UT in Yorkville medical institute say stem cells can be useful to treat leukemia, breast cancer and many other diseases. Other treatments are for injury to spinal cord, liver damage, diabetes, parkinson and multiple scierosis.
It is good to see more people are realising this and not to discard this valuable life material
these are universitet that d o stem cell researc h for diabetes and othre disease.
Center for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine
CSCRM - Center for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine
universitet o f Toronto as Lopetta she quote
Toronto Stem Cell Initiative- Home
fro m m y thread an USMB
http://www.usmessageboard.com/health-and-lifestyle/66327-type-1-diabetes.html
Thanks, but none of those links show specific medical treatment success's involving fetal or embryonic stem cells.
Science, like anything else, should pay its own freight.
If stem cells, embryonic or otherwise, are the supposed miracle cure for anything and everything, then investors who smell a profit will provide the proper capitalization for research.
You can always tell where the REAL potential is by where the private venture capital is. If a line of research MUST have government funding to even exist, it's a waste of time.
ever think because one has more funding then other along with one having more regulations then the other! I agree with Kitten also, if the fetus is already being aborted why not put it to good use!There have been numerous medical success's using adult stem cells for treatment.
Can anybody provide a link to show successful medical treatments that used embryonic or fetal stem cells?
I'm starting to think science should focus on what works.
That all depende upon how you define "freedom"....Hence no market is ever legitimately free. But why do I doubt that you will reach this conclusion with me?
....Honestly, if [fetuses] already died why waste their non-lives and just toss them in the garbage when you can at least make it mean something? Even pro-lifers should be for this since it give some meaning to the wasted life.
So you agree with GW Bush's decision to finance research on existing fetal cell lines.
Your insults and deflections cannot mask the fact the GW Bush made a brilliant decision on embryonic stem cell research, and one that no sane person can disagree with, not even you.I have said Bush is an idiot, not mindless. One is possible to agree with someone sometimes but not most of the time. If I met him in person I would pick his brain as I would anyone else, but never would I respect someone who can't even read a book for children much less read a speech well enough that I laugh at every attempt to use common phrases.
Okay ... laughable at best. Adult or embryonic isn't the issue, a stem cell is still a stem cell, the difference is the quantity they can gain. Making stem cells from adults is very costly and extremely difficult, but a fetus has a lot that are already grown. Honestly, if they already died why waste their non-lives and just toss them in the garbage when you can at least make it mean something? Even pro-lifers should be for this since it give some meaning to the wasted life.
ever think because one has more funding then other along with one having more regulations then the other! I agree with Kitten also, if the fetus is already being aborted why not put it to good use!
ever think because one has more funding then other along with one having more regulations then the other! I agree with Kitten also, if the fetus is already being aborted why not put it to good use!
So you agree with GW Bush's decision to finance research on existing fetal cell lines.
If the funding is coming from the private sector, why do you think that is?
Personally, I think the government has no business funding either one.