Supreme Court DiNozzo's Obama

[Iceweasel]

In what alternate universe is one living in that they read this and determine he SCOTUS deemed clean air unconstitutional?

Shotgun tokes off a powerbong will do that.

 

[Uncensored2008]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

Lie much?

Fucking Commies...

 

[Avatar4321]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

The issued a Stay, they did not overturn it. The case is still making its way through the courts.

Why do you have to lie even about things like this?

Yo moron, I didn't make up the link.

You just failed to question what it was saying

Is it really better to be a lemming than being a liar? I'd rather be neither

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

In what alternate universe is one living in that they read this and determine he SCOTUS deemed clean air unconstitutional?

Really? Have you read some of the idiot statements that this guy has made previously? If you're looking for a spark of intelligence, you might as well be looking for signs of life on Oberon (for those of you who don't know "Hangover for one", that's one of Uranus' moons).

 

[WorldWatcher]

The issued a Stay, they did not overturn it. The case is still making its way through the courts.

Actually it wasn't a stay, a stay prevents implementation of a lower court decision pending review by a higher court.

In this case the SCOTUS accepted a case out of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, completed their review and ruled on the case itself. The decision as a reversal of the lower court ruling and the case was remanded back for proceedings that comply with the decision.


>>>>

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yo moron, I didn't make up the link.

You made up the title of the tread saying the SCOTUS declared clean air unconstitutional, they did not.


>>>>

 

[saveliberty]

“The mere fact that the EPA wished to ignore the costs of its rules demonstrates how little the agency is concerned about the effects it has on the American people,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said in a statement.

“The Supreme Court’s decision today vindicates the House’s legislative actions to rein in bureaucratic overreach and institute some common sense in rulemaking,” McCarthy said.

I served on the local utility committee and this is very good news.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

In what alternate universe is one living in that they read this and determine he SCOTUS deemed clean air unconstitutional?

Really? Have you read some of the idiot statements that this guy has made previously? If you're looking for a spark of intelligence, you might as well be looking for signs of life on Oberon (for those of you who don't know "Hangover for one", that's one of Uranus' moons).

Yeah, I know... he does post some bizarre stuff.

 

[OldLady]

Future generations will look back on humans from our time with disappointment. They will wonder how so many could possibly have been so ignorant. I only hope their disappointment is tempered by the knowledge that some of us tried to do the right thing.

If there are future generations to look back and ponder....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Future generations will look back on humans from our time with disappointment. They will wonder how so many could possibly have been so ignorant. I only hope their disappointment is tempered by the knowledge that some of us tried to do the right thing.

If there are future generations to look back and ponder....

Dude, CO2 is gonna kill ya!!!

 

[martybegan]

The issued a Stay, they did not overturn it. The case is still making its way through the courts.

Actually it wasn't a stay, a stay prevents implementation of a lower court decision pending review by a higher court.

In this case the SCOTUS accepted a case out of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, completed their review and ruled on the case itself. The decision as a reversal of the lower court ruling and the case was remanded back for proceedings that comply with the decision.


>>>>

According to Scotusblog:

The new orders will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.

Carbon pollution controls put on hold

I don't see anything about the DC Circuit being told by the SC anything on the merits about the rules themselves, just that the SC said the rules couldn't be implemented until further review.

Maybe not a "stay" technically, but its still not a ruling on the merits of the case in the DC Circuit, just that the EPA can't make companies comply with the current timeline.

 

[OldLady]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

 

[Contumacious]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

IT SURPRISED ME THAT A SUPREME "COURT" WHICH APPROVED OBAMA HELLCARE WOULD STAYED CLIMATE CHANGE RULES.

OBAMA'S BIG MISTAKE IS NOT CALLING THE CLIMATE CHANGE RULES A TAX.

THIS IS ONLY A TEMPORAY SET BACK - AFTER ALL THE 'justices" (wink, wink) HAVE SWORN TO DEFEND AND SUPPORT THE GARGANTUAN WELFARE/WARFARE POLICE STATE.


.

 

[BluesLegend]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

 

[g5000]

martybegan is correct this is a stay. However, the OP article is very poorly written, and the headline of the article even says the Supreme Court "overturns landmark EPA rule".

The EPA still has a chance to save the rule by correcting its cost-benefit analysis.

These changes to air quality were initiated by the EPA in 2008. The one in dispute went into effect in 2011.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Carbon pollution controls put on hold

I don't see anything about the DC Circuit being told by the SC anything on the merits about the rules themselves, just that the SC said the rules couldn't be implemented until further review.

Maybe not a "stay" technically, but its still not a ruling on the merits of the case in the DC Circuit, just that the EPA can't make companies comply with the current timeline.

I refer to the SCOTUS decision in the case (linked in the story from the op) -->> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-46_10n2.pdf

"Petitioners (who include 23 States) sought review of EPA’s rule in the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit. As relevant here, they challenged the Agency’s refusal to consider cost when deciding whether to regulate power plants. The Court of Appeals upheld the Agency’s decision not to consider cost, with Judge Kavanaugh concurring in part and dissenting in part. White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. EPA, 748 F. 3d 1222 (2014) (per curiam). We granted certiorari. 574 U. S. ___ (2014)."

<<SNIP>>

"We hold that EPA interpreted §7412(n)(1)(A) unreasonably when it deemed cost irrelevant to the decision to regulate power plants. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit and remand the cases for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered."


>>>>

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dude, CO2 is gonna kill ya!!!

More people die from air pollution than Malaria and HIV/Aids, new study shows

More than 3 million people a year are killed prematurely by outdoor air pollution, according to a landmark new study, more than malaria and HIV/Aids combined. Wood and coal burning for heating homes and cooking is the biggest cause, especially in Asia, but the research reveals a remarkably heavy toll from farming emissions in Europe and the US, where it is the leading cause of deaths. The report warns that, unless action is taken, the number of deaths – already equivalent to six deaths every minute – will double by 2050. “This projection should sound alarm bells for public health agencies around the world,” said environmental health expert Professor Michael Jerrett, at the University of California and who was not involved in the research.

Cool story, dude.
But we're talking about CO2, not pollution.

 

[martybegan]

Carbon pollution controls put on hold

I don't see anything about the DC Circuit being told by the SC anything on the merits about the rules themselves, just that the SC said the rules couldn't be implemented until further review.

Maybe not a "stay" technically, but its still not a ruling on the merits of the case in the DC Circuit, just that the EPA can't make companies comply with the current timeline.

I refer to the SCOTUS decision in the case (linked in the story from the op) -->> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-46_10n2.pdf

"Petitioners (who include 23 States) sought review of EPA’s rule in the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit. As relevant here, they challenged the Agency’s refusal to consider cost when deciding whether to regulate power plants. The Court of Appeals upheld the Agency’s decision not to consider cost, with Judge Kavanaugh concurring in part and dissenting in part. White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. EPA, 748 F. 3d 1222 (2014) (per curiam). We granted certiorari. 574 U. S. ___ (2014)."

<<SNIP>>

"We hold that EPA interpreted §7412(n)(1)(A) unreasonably when it deemed cost irrelevant to the decision to regulate power plants. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit and remand the cases for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered."


>>>>

So the lower court has to take cost into account, but the SC hasn't said anything else that would impact the D.C. Circuits decision.

If there is no Stay issued, what prevents the government from implementing the requirements?

 

[easyt65]

'Sureme Court declares clean air is unconstitutional'

Only a die-hard Liberal 'Obamapologist' could describe the USSC ruling in such a way.

Yes, boys and girls, the USSC and the GOP hate clean air & clean water, and they are holding back the 'savior' from saving us and the world!

 

[OldLady]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.