Surprise... California voter records show 144% over those legal to vote

[Bob Blaylock]

You conspiratorial dipshits have been pushing this narrative of millions of fraudulent votes cast ever since the election and not once in all this time has there been a single shred of proof it happened, not once. If it was even remotely true it would be easy to unveil, so blow me.

Who claimed no fraud exists? Talk about disingenuous.

 

[Clementine]

What if they all moved to find jobs?

Funny how you libs are always singing California's praises. Gosh, why would anyone leave that utopia? And are you claiming they all just left? States should stay on top of voter rolls. We need to do away with motor voter registration and ensure that the ones registering are likely to actually vote, and that they are citizens.

And the counties with more voters than eligible registered voters went heavily for Hillary. Damn, how many coincidences can we accept when it comes to the Clintons and their amazing luck. You know, like the way people who can hurt them seem to kill themselves at the most opportune time for the Clintons.

 

[flacaltenn]

There's no innovation or INCENTIVE to be accurate or frugal. Registrars should send confirmation letters to the addresses of record every 5 years or so. But they don't.

The only way to assure voter rolls are somewhat accurate is for purging to take place. That's what we did in my state until a liberal court got a hold of it and forced us to put all those purged voters back on the voter rolls.

Those who have had absolutely no voting activity of any kind in two years were sent a postcard asking for a conformation they were still active voters. If the card was not returned, they gave it another four years to monitor the names of those voters. If still no activity after six years, they removed the names from the voter rolls.

Last I could find it's headed to the Supreme Court as the ACLU and various other organizations are fighting this common sense approach.

Neil Gorsuch's First Voting Rights Case

That's the garbage that makes govt so maddenly inefficient and inept. Voting systems are one of the top PRIMARY functions of Govt. And they treat it as lower priority than a "plastic bag ordinance".

 

[danielpalos]

What if they all moved to find jobs?

Funny how you libs are always singing California's praises. Gosh, why would anyone leave that utopia? And are you claiming they all just left? States should stay on top of voter rolls. We need to do away with motor voter registration and ensure that the ones registering are likely to actually vote, and that they are citizens.

And the counties with more voters than eligible registered voters went heavily for Hillary. Damn, how many coincidences can we accept when it comes to the Clintons and their amazing luck. You know, like the way people who can hurt them seem to kill themselves at the most opportune time for the Clintons.

Just that domicile. They could have simply moved out of the county. Only right wingers claim what you do.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So Trump got 44% more votes in California than he should have?

I'm not surprised.

yup, all that Liberal voter fraud cost Clinton the election.


es

You Nazis are stupid. You had it in you central cortex (can't say "mind" when talking about democrats,) that if you loaded up already locked California, that would somehow put Hillary in office. Even today you Nazis still think it matters.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

I really give a shit?

your standard answer now days .... yet here you are whining louder than anyone not giving a shit.

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

The treason you are engaged in demands a response. Some of us vowed "never again." You Nazi scum are back to your old tricks, decent people mean to stop you.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

Cleaning voter registration lists does not mean there is fraud

Problem is it takes money and manpower to purge lists of people who have moved or died. Very few people notify the registrar when they move.

Even two of Trumps dear children were registered in two states

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Cleaning voter registration lists does not mean there is fraud

Problem is it takes money and manpower to purge lists of people who have moved or died. Very few people notify the registrar when they move.

Even two of Trumps dear children were registered in two states

Then why do you Nazis go to court to block the purging of voter registration?

Supreme Court to hear Ohio voter purge case

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

Cleaning voter registration lists does not mean there is fraud

Problem is it takes money and manpower to purge lists of people who have moved or died. Very few people notify the registrar when they move.

Even two of Trumps dear children were registered in two states

Which makes it even more of a reason to have Voter-ID.

 

[rightwinger]

They let illegals get drivers licenses, they say so they would pay insurance...nope I bet that is where your voters are..

Think real hard now...there are more people registered to vote than there are people of legal age to vote.

You whooooo if an illegal registers to vote because he has a license, he would not show up in the consensus as a resident..

.

Yeah you run with that nonsense.

Cali needs to clean it up, any state should if they have this big of a problem. If they don't they are welcoming accusations of fraud

DMV licensed 800,000 undocumented immigrants ( just in case you can't find your glasses )

Critics also point to another state “motor-voter” law, AB 1461, that starting in 2017 will automatically register most licensed California drivers to vote, arguing it could lead to election fraud if non-citizens barred from voting in federal elections become registered.

California driver licenses given to 800,000 undocumented immigrants

Fool, you are just proving our point! The state has no business handing out driver licenses to illegal aliens with no legal status in being here. Once you get a driver's license, that opens the door to you getting other kinds of identification you should not legally have.

The purpose of a drivers license is to provide proof that you have been trained and meet the standards to drive
I would rather see illegal immigrants prove they can drive and carrying insurance than operating under the radar

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

Cleaning voter registration lists does not mean there is fraud

Problem is it takes money and manpower to purge lists of people who have moved or died. Very few people notify the registrar when they move.

Even two of Trumps dear children were registered in two states

Which makes it even more of a reason to have Voter-ID.

Why?

If you are registered in two municipalities your ID would be accepted in both

 

[Wry Catcher]

I saw earlier 11 counties in Cali have more registered voters than legal age people to vote.

There is a problem

Yeah, the problem is there is no evidence posted with your allegation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

Cleaning voter registration lists does not mean there is fraud

Problem is it takes money and manpower to purge lists of people who have moved or died. Very few people notify the registrar when they move.

Even two of Trumps dear children were registered in two states

Which makes it even more of a reason to have Voter-ID.

Why?

If you are registered in two municipalities your ID would be accepted in both

Then you would have to vote using that same identity, and that would constitute voter fraud and you would be charged.

 

[Wry Catcher]

If the President and the Congress really believes voter fraud is epidemic than they ought to pass and fund a law requiring every ballot to include a palm print Live Scanned on the ballot and submitted to a super computer - any duplicate votes could then be flagged and invalidated.

 

[Conservative65]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

All that means is people have moved away, but they are still on the voter rolls. There is no evidence that any of these people voted in the election, so your 3 million + vote claim is still nothing more than a bullshit conspiracy.

It means they moved away? It could mean a lot of things including what you call a bullshit conspiracy. Because you don't want to believe it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

All that means is people have moved away, but they are still on the voter rolls. There is no evidence that any of these people voted in the election, so your 3 million + vote claim is still nothing more than a bullshit conspiracy.

It means they moved away? It could mean a lot of things including what you call a bullshit conspiracy. Because you don't want to believe it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Because you believe in massive voter fraud does prove you're a biddable and easily fooled man-child.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

FACT- the U.S. harbors 20-50 million illegals
FACT- millions of illegals had the ability and opportunity to vote
FACT- illegals have never been more encouraged or motivated to vote

Most Liberals can't pry their head from their ass and their lips from the wetback penis long enough to seek the truth and connect the dots. The question isn't IF illegals voted the question is how many voted...and let's be honest, the desperate dumbasses threw logic and reason out a long time ago. Libs especially want to play dumb to this issue...so unless someone presents them with video footage of X number of human cockroaches voting they won't believe any figure.


"Circumstantial evidence
For other uses, see Circumstantial Evidence (disambiguation).
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—like a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidencesupports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference.

On its own, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one explanation. Different pieces of circumstantial evidence may be required, so that each corroborates the conclusions drawn from the others. Together, they may more strongly support one particular inferenceover another. An explanation involving circumstantial evidence becomes more likely once alternative explanations have been ruled out[citation needed].

Circumstantial evidence allows a trier of fact to infer that a fact exists.[1] In criminal law, the inference is made by the trier of fact in order to support the truth of an assertion (of guilt or absence of guilt).

Testimony can be direct evidence or it can be circumstantial. For instance, a witness saying that she saw a defendant stab a victim is providing direct evidence. By contrast, a witness who says that she saw the defendant enter a house, that she heard screaming, and that she saw the defendant leave with a bloody knife gives circumstantial evidence. It is the necessity for inference, and not the obviousness of a conclusion, that determines whether evidence is circumstantial.

Forensic evidence supplied by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence. For instance, a forensic scientist may provide results of ballistic tests proving that the defendant’s firearm fired the bullets that killed the victim, but not necessarily that the defendant fired the shots.

Circumstantial evidence is especially important in civil and criminal cases where direct evidence is lacking.


Validity of circumstantial evidence
A popular misconception is that circumstantial evidence is less valid or less important than direct evidence[ambiguous].[2][3] This is only partly true: direct evidence is popularly, but mistakenly, considered more powerful[citation needed][by whom?]. Many successful criminal prosecutions rely largely or entirely on circumstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence. Much of the evidence against convicted American bomber Timothy McVeigh was circumstantial, for example. Speaking about McVeigh's trial, University of Michigan law professor Robert Precht said, "Circumstantial evidence can be, and often is much more powerful than direct evidence." [4]The 2004 murder trial of Scott Peterson was another high-profile conviction based heavily on circumstantial evidence.

Indeed, the common metaphor for the strongest possible evidence in any case—the "smoking gun"—is an example of proof based on circumstantial evidence[ambiguous]. Similarly, fingerprint evidence, videotapes, sound recordings, photographs, and many other examples of physical evidence that support the drawing of an inference, i.e., circumstantial evidence, are considered very strong possible evidence.

In practice, circumstantial evidence can have an advantage over direct evidence in that it can come from multiple sources that check and reinforce each other.[5] Eyewitness testimony can be inaccurate at times,[6] and many persons have been convicted on the basis of perjured or otherwise mistaken testimony.[7] Thus, strong circumstantial evidence can provide a more reliable basis for a verdict. Circumstantial evidence normally requires a witness, such as the police officer who found the evidence, or an expert who examined it, to lay the foundation for its admission. This witness, sometimes known as the sponsor or the authenticating witness, is giving direct (eye-witness) testimony, and could present credibility problems in the same way that any eye witness does.

However, there is often more than one logical conclusion inferable from the same set of circumstances. In cases where one conclusion implies a defendant's guilt and another his innocence, the "benefit of the doubt" principle would apply. Indeed, if the circumstantial evidence suggests a possibility of innocence, the prosecution has the burden of disproving that possibility"

 

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats are always saying "There's no such thing as voter fraud." Bullshit. Here's your 3 million+ popular vote margin Hillary won by...

Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch announced it sent a notice-of-violation letter to the state of California and 11 of its counties threatening to sue in federal court if it does not clean its voter registration lists as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls. The August 1 letter was sent on behalf of several Judicial Watch California supporters and the Election Integrity Project California, Inc.

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

87 ballots delivered to one address all with different names but same address:

San Pedro resident receives nearly 90 ballots addressed to others

FACT- the U.S. harbors 20-50 million illegals
FACT- millions of illegals had the ability and opportunity to vote
FACT- illegals have never been more encouraged or motivated to vote

Most Liberals can't pry their head from their ass and their lips from the wetback penis long enough to seek the truth and connect the dots. The question isn't IF illegals voted the question is how many voted...and let's be honest, the desperate dumbasses threw logic and reason out a long time ago. Libs especially want to play dumb to this issue...so unless someone presents them with video footage of X number of human cockroaches voting they won't believe any figure.


"Circumstantial evidence
For other uses, see Circumstantial Evidence (disambiguation).
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—like a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidencesupports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference.

On its own, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one explanation. Different pieces of circumstantial evidence may be required, so that each corroborates the conclusions drawn from the others. Together, they may more strongly support one particular inferenceover another. An explanation involving circumstantial evidence becomes more likely once alternative explanations have been ruled out[citation needed].

Circumstantial evidence allows a trier of fact to infer that a fact exists.[1] In criminal law, the inference is made by the trier of fact in order to support the truth of an assertion (of guilt or absence of guilt).

Testimony can be direct evidence or it can be circumstantial. For instance, a witness saying that she saw a defendant stab a victim is providing direct evidence. By contrast, a witness who says that she saw the defendant enter a house, that she heard screaming, and that she saw the defendant leave with a bloody knife gives circumstantial evidence. It is the necessity for inference, and not the obviousness of a conclusion, that determines whether evidence is circumstantial.

Forensic evidence supplied by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence. For instance, a forensic scientist may provide results of ballistic tests proving that the defendant’s firearm fired the bullets that killed the victim, but not necessarily that the defendant fired the shots.

Circumstantial evidence is especially important in civil and criminal cases where direct evidence is lacking.


Validity of circumstantial evidence
A popular misconception is that circumstantial evidence is less valid or less important than direct evidence[ambiguous].[2][3] This is only partly true: direct evidence is popularly, but mistakenly, considered more powerful[citation needed][by whom?]. Many successful criminal prosecutions rely largely or entirely on circumstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence. Much of the evidence against convicted American bomber Timothy McVeigh was circumstantial, for example. Speaking about McVeigh's trial, University of Michigan law professor Robert Precht said, "Circumstantial evidence can be, and often is much more powerful than direct evidence." [4]The 2004 murder trial of Scott Peterson was another high-profile conviction based heavily on circumstantial evidence.

Indeed, the common metaphor for the strongest possible evidence in any case—the "smoking gun"—is an example of proof based on circumstantial evidence[ambiguous]. Similarly, fingerprint evidence, videotapes, sound recordings, photographs, and many other examples of physical evidence that support the drawing of an inference, i.e., circumstantial evidence, are considered very strong possible evidence.

In practice, circumstantial evidence can have an advantage over direct evidence in that it can come from multiple sources that check and reinforce each other.[5] Eyewitness testimony can be inaccurate at times,[6] and many persons have been convicted on the basis of perjured or otherwise mistaken testimony.[7] Thus, strong circumstantial evidence can provide a more reliable basis for a verdict. Circumstantial evidence normally requires a witness, such as the police officer who found the evidence, or an expert who examined it, to lay the foundation for its admission. This witness, sometimes known as the sponsor or the authenticating witness, is giving direct (eye-witness) testimony, and could present credibility problems in the same way that any eye witness does.

However, there is often more than one logical conclusion inferable from the same set of circumstances. In cases where one conclusion implies a defendant's guilt and another his innocence, the "benefit of the doubt" principle would apply. Indeed, if the circumstantial evidence suggests a possibility of innocence, the prosecution has the burden of disproving that possibility"

“Circumstantial evidence is a very tricky thing,” answered Holmes thoughtfully. “It may seem to point very straight to one thing, but if you shift your own point of view a little, you may find it pointing in an equally uncompromising manner to something entirely different.”

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle,
“The Boscombe Valley Mystery,”
The Complete Sherlock Holmes, pg. 204,
by, Sir Conan Doyle,

 

[Dschrute3]

Now we know for sure why California is refusing to cooperate with the Voter-Fraud Investigation Trump is proposing. Personally, i feel Thousands possibly Millions of Illegal votes were cast in California alone.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Now we know for sure why California is refusing to cooperate with the Voter-Fraud Investigation Trump is proposing. Personally, i feel Thousands possibly Millions of Illegal votes were cast in California alone.

I'm so sorry you feel that way. If you stop being infected by Trump and the Trumpanzees fake stories, you may feel better sooner than later.