Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
BS.He showed he couldn't prove intent, which required by law.
Not the same.
No. We are saying Hur couldn't prove intent...which is required.
Its the law.
BS.
He knowingly violated the law his whole life. Showed classified info to a book writer.
He like Hillary are guilty as Hell.
You are here to defend the undefensable with your Lies.
That dog dont hunt with me.
Repeating what is detailed in Hur's report is not a con.Play your Con game somewhere else.
There is a recording of Biden telling the guy he has classified docs in the basement, and to be careful with them.That isn't what Hur said.
See post 181.
What part of 2021 were they discussing? What is the context of the questioning?Trump said he wasn't president in 2021.
Which is it?
“I was so busy in the White House, focusing on Russia and China and keeping our country safe,” Trump said of his duties that year. The discrepancy was immediately pointed out by state lawyer Kevin Wallace. “And just to refresh your recollection, you were not president in 2021?” he asked. “No I wasn’t,” Trump replied.
Trump thought the documents belonged to him, so why charges for Trump and not Tater?Please read the Hur report instead of right wing media.
Biden thought the documents belonged to him.
Yeah. I read it. He didn't think prosecutors could prove intent.
No. It did not.
Intent is required. No intent; no violation..
No he did not.
Please link what source is providing this info to you.
You mean former Secret Service agent Bongino?I heard Dan Bongino saying these very words today.
Are you channeling Bongino?
Or maybe other people are telling you what to say?
Yep, photographic.There is nothing there I don't already know from the report.
What do you believe that is different except for Hur saying Biden had a photographic memory?
Would “willfully” show intent?Yeah, intent couldn't be proven.
Not true.
Agreed, he did say that. Yet Hur determined...There is a recording of Biden telling the guy he has classified docs in the basement, and to be careful with them.
It isn't spin. It's the law.Hur can spin that all he wants for morons like you, but it won’t change reality.
No, I mean washed up, loud-mouthed, conspiracy theorist Bongino.You mean former Secret Service agent Bongino?
Did you not watch the clip in 248?Agreed, he did say that. Yet Hur determined...
Page 232.
We do not believe this evidence would meet the government's burden at trial to prove Mr. Biden knew his handling of the notebooks broke law. We expect Mr. Biden's defense would be that he thought his notebooks were his personal property and that he was allowed to take them home after his vice presidency, even they contained classified information. Enough evidence supports this defense to establish reasonable doubt.
It isn't spin. It's the law.
I suggest you read and understand the report instead of parroting right wing talking points.
Big Mike from what I hear!I think we will see a replacement for him this summer
Tuck tail and run!If all you want to talk about is me instead of the thread topic I guess we are done.
Have a good day.
Post 202 contains the link.What part of 2021 were they discussing? What is the context of the questioning?
Must be why you didn’t provide a link, huh Simp?
Trump has no charges related to thinking the documents were his.Trump thought the documents belonged to him, so why charges for Trump and not Tater?
Would “willfully” show intent?
Page one of the report.
No.Did you not watch the clip in 248?
More Lies from the WEF TROLL. He committed Felonies period. But the Swamp protects their ownHur disagrees with you.
Hillary wasn't guilty either.
Nope. Just reiterating what was in Hur's report.
Of course you are free to create your own narrative. A lot of people do it when it when they can't cope with reality.
Repeating what is detailed in Hur's report is not a con.
