Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.
They're more efficient, they need fewer workers and can offer lower prices.
The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.
And all their satisfied customers.
Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.
Idiot is what you are, when it comes to economics. No code needed.
If we continue lose jobs how are we going to even afford those lower prices?
You as all Induvidualists are basically clueless savages.
If we continue lose jobs how are we going to even afford those lower prices?
Over 90% of Americans once worked on farms.
If we only have 2% working on farms today, how will Americans even be able to afford the cheaper food?
Productivity going up can be good, so long as the workers get higher wages.
That doesn't seem to happen all too much, anymore.
Since the 1970's productivity in the USA is way up, but real wages aren't for the working class masses, ONLY CEO's have seen their wages sky rocket since the 1970's.
A mix of 3 things appear to be to blame, Manufacturing losses due to outsourcing, job competition with immigrants, and the loss of union paying jobs.
All 3 of those things are at least partially, sometimes even fully Capitalist related.
Basically, you're doing everything that lead us here.
The system is broken, we need new ideas, not much of the cr@piness that you've done for the past 40 years that lead us to stagnation, Liberalism, and Multiculturalism.
Productivity going up can be good, so long as the workers get higher wages.
Productivity going up is also good when it gives consumers lower prices.
but real wages aren't for the working class masses,
You're lying.
All 3 of those things are at least partially, sometimes even fully Capitalist related.
Is that why wages are up in Venezuela? No capitalism.
Real wages have pretty much stagnated since the 1970's.
Its pretty visible.
Take 1970 where the average house price was just over $23,000 vs an average income of a family being just under $10,000.
In 2018 the average house price was $240,000 , and the average income of a family was $63,000.
Basically, in 1970 the average price of a house was 2.3X higher than the average income per year, of family, as opposed to the average price of a house in 2018 being more like 3.8X higher than the average income per year of a family.
Well, who can argue with two anecdotal data points? LOL!