Tax cuts for the rich, why?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Civilization requires taxation.

Does it require taxation to prevent people from freely spending their money in ways that you dislike?

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I've seen some Polish idiots who don't grasp it.

As if Bezos needs more money, who Bezos has more money than he knows to do with, largely by ridding the country of many of his competitors & shops, which in return diminishes jobs because he took away a ton of jobs & consolidated them into his crappy Amazon warehouses, where he borderline oppresses his employees with watches which time & track his employees, (Something straight out of Orwell's 1984)

Lol, Poles get most things correct, Brits get most things incorrect.

Germans don't get much correct, either.

Western Europeans in general are racial scums, the disaster race.

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

As if Bezos needs more money, who Bezos has more money than he knows to do with, largely by ridding the country of many of his competitors & shops, which in return diminishes jobs because he took away a ton of jobs & consolidated them into his crappy Amazon warehouses, where he borderline oppresses his employees with watches which time & track his employees, (Something straight out of Orwell's 1984)

Lol, Poles get most things correct, Brits get most things incorrect.

Germans don't get much correct, either.

Western Europeans in general are racial scums, the disaster race.

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

 

[2aguy]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

This affects you or rather your parents since you're in the high tax commuter zone of Gotham
And it's on topic target ...something the left wingers have a real hard time with


Democrats try to restore a tax cut for the rich
by Washington Examiner
| December 15, 2019 12:00 AM

Some people may be surprised to see Democrats fighting to expand a tax deduction for the wealthy. We are not.

It makes perfect sense, if you think about it.
The House Ways and Means Committee voted nearly along party lines to repeal a part of the 2017 Republican tax cut. But it wasn’t the corporate-rate cut Democrats were targeting. It wasn’t some imagined tax cut for corporate jets. Rather, Democrats passed a bill to scrap the cap on very-high-income individuals’ ability to deduct their state and local taxes on their federal tax returns.

The deduction for state and local taxes, or SALT, still exists. Republicans merely capped the deduction at $10,000. Since Republicans also doubled the standard deduction, this cap really only affects the uberwealthy. To repeat, after more than a decade of campaigning against "tax cuts for the rich," Democrats are now fighting tooth and nail for a special interest deduction that helps only the wealthy.

Democrats call their bill the Restoring Tax Fairness for States and Localities Act, but it should be titled, “Expanding Tax Breaks for Wealthy White Suburban Democratic Voters Act.” Expanding the deduction won’t help most taxpayers in New York, California, or New Jersey. It will help only those whose incomes or property values are very high.

“It is too simple to say that the deduction only benefits high-tax states,” Nicole Kaeding at the Tax Foundation recently testified. “It is better understood as benefiting high-income individuals, many of whom reside in high-tax jurisdictions with high housing values.”
If the Democratic bill becomes law, it would not cut taxes for any families whose total deductible expenses, including state and local taxes, are below $24,000; those taxpayers will still take the standard deduction as current law allows. The Democratic bill would not cut taxes for anyone whose state and local income taxes add up to less than $10,000. In other words, this can in no way be mistaken for a middle-class tax cut.


Read the rest at the Washington Examiner

Democrats cut taxes = bad.
Republicans cut taxes = good.

Got it.

Wow way to spin and project like a leftard
That's a disappointment

You're bitching about tax cuts for the rich ....I gave you something you we're just bitching about ...

I'm a right wing capitalist pig

tax cuts , deregulation and hang john brennan at dawn for all

In the 1950's we had a top bracket tax rate of 91%.

1950's economy was good, infrastructure was good, and debt was far lower.

Presumably if we didn't budge that down to less than half of that, we wouldn't have all this debt.

We could use more taxes to pay off the debt, and build newer, and better infrastructure.

The only reason that didn't wreck our economy is the industrial base of every other European and Asian country had been blown up during World War 2............and our rebuilding their industries allowed us to make lots of money.

 

[2aguy]

Civilization requires taxation.

Does it require taxation to prevent people from freely spending their money in ways that you dislike?

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I've seen some Polish idiots who don't grasp it.

As if Bezos needs more money, who Bezos has more money than he knows to do with, largely by ridding the country of many of his competitors & shops, which in return diminishes jobs because he took away a ton of jobs & consolidated them into his crappy Amazon warehouses, where he borderline oppresses his employees with watches which time & track his employees, (Something straight out of Orwell's 1984)

Lol, Poles get most things correct, Brits get most things incorrect.

Germans don't get much correct, either.

Western Europeans in general are racial scums, the disaster race.

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

The only monopolies are businesses protected by the government.....

 

[22lcidw]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

Why do Prog Dems refuse to give the working/middle class nice tax cuts? They talk about the rich all the time while increasing taxes on the middle classes. Repubs seem to give the middle classes a tax cut but it also includes the rich.

Poor people wish to stop being poor, while Bezos, Buffet, and Gates have more money than they know what to do with.
That makes sense?

A lot of research shows that once you're middle class, being wealthier doesn't really increase happiness.

Perhaps not. But it does bring a few more comforts.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

This affects you or rather your parents since you're in the high tax commuter zone of Gotham
And it's on topic target ...something the left wingers have a real hard time with


Democrats try to restore a tax cut for the rich
by Washington Examiner
| December 15, 2019 12:00 AM

Some people may be surprised to see Democrats fighting to expand a tax deduction for the wealthy. We are not.

It makes perfect sense, if you think about it.
The House Ways and Means Committee voted nearly along party lines to repeal a part of the 2017 Republican tax cut. But it wasn’t the corporate-rate cut Democrats were targeting. It wasn’t some imagined tax cut for corporate jets. Rather, Democrats passed a bill to scrap the cap on very-high-income individuals’ ability to deduct their state and local taxes on their federal tax returns.

The deduction for state and local taxes, or SALT, still exists. Republicans merely capped the deduction at $10,000. Since Republicans also doubled the standard deduction, this cap really only affects the uberwealthy. To repeat, after more than a decade of campaigning against "tax cuts for the rich," Democrats are now fighting tooth and nail for a special interest deduction that helps only the wealthy.

Democrats call their bill the Restoring Tax Fairness for States and Localities Act, but it should be titled, “Expanding Tax Breaks for Wealthy White Suburban Democratic Voters Act.” Expanding the deduction won’t help most taxpayers in New York, California, or New Jersey. It will help only those whose incomes or property values are very high.

“It is too simple to say that the deduction only benefits high-tax states,” Nicole Kaeding at the Tax Foundation recently testified. “It is better understood as benefiting high-income individuals, many of whom reside in high-tax jurisdictions with high housing values.”
If the Democratic bill becomes law, it would not cut taxes for any families whose total deductible expenses, including state and local taxes, are below $24,000; those taxpayers will still take the standard deduction as current law allows. The Democratic bill would not cut taxes for anyone whose state and local income taxes add up to less than $10,000. In other words, this can in no way be mistaken for a middle-class tax cut.


Read the rest at the Washington Examiner

Democrats cut taxes = bad.
Republicans cut taxes = good.

Got it.

Wow way to spin and project like a leftard
That's a disappointment

You're bitching about tax cuts for the rich ....I gave you something you we're just bitching about ...

I'm a right wing capitalist pig

tax cuts , deregulation and hang john brennan at dawn for all

In the 1950's we had a top bracket tax rate of 91%.

1950's economy was good, infrastructure was good, and debt was far lower.

Presumably if we didn't budge that down to less than half of that, we wouldn't have all this debt.

We could use more taxes to pay off the debt, and build newer, and better infrastructure.

The only reason that didn't wreck our economy is the industrial base of every other European and Asian country had been blown up during World War 2............and our rebuilding their industries allowed us to make lots of money.

No, not really.

We are talking about taxing rich civilians more, Corporate tax rates are a different story.

 

[80zephyr]

Most Americans should be united here.



A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

I'd like to see that math. The 400 richest Americans are worth a combined 2.96 trillion dollars. Our debt is 20+ trillion.

Mark

 

[Dick Foster]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

Maybe the tax cuts favor the rich more because they pay more of the taxes ya dumb SOB.
What gives you the right to someone else's money? Answer that one, asshole.

Why should the rich horde money they'll never even spend, where's the sense in that?

You'd have to be pretty dang ignorant, to not grasp how the rich are messing up America, flooding it with illegals, outsourcing manufacturing, pushing for Liberal agendas, left, and right.



I'm the dumb SOB?

No, no, that's you, and your ilk.

I've not met many people more dumb than British Protestants. LOL
You & your brood seem to have very one track minded, and short sighted ideas.

My guess is that you don't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of because you're not considered well to do or even comfortable. Guess what, the primary cause of that is lack of disciple on YOUR part. You have no will and no self control. Well tough titty, you made your own bed so lay in it asshole. You can be better off anytime you want. All you have to do is get up off of your lazy dead ass and try. It's not anyone else's job, it's yours.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, Bezos needs 109 billion,

Where did I say that?

but the poor deserve nothing.

Where did I say that?

Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer

He's increased productivity and reduced prices. Bastard!!!

Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're poorly educated.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

They're more efficient, they need fewer workers and can offer lower prices.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

And all their satisfied customers.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

Idiot is what you are, when it comes to economics. No code needed.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

Maybe the tax cuts favor the rich more because they pay more of the taxes ya dumb SOB.
What gives you the right to someone else's money? Answer that one, asshole.

Why should the rich horde money they'll never even spend, where's the sense in that?

You'd have to be pretty dang ignorant, to not grasp how the rich are messing up America, flooding it with illegals, outsourcing manufacturing, pushing for Liberal agendas, left, and right.



I'm the dumb SOB?

No, no, that's you, and your ilk.

I've not met many people more dumb than British Protestants. LOL
You & your brood seem to have very one track minded, and short sighted ideas.

My guess is that you don't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of because you're not considered well to do or even comfortable. Guess what, the primary cause of that is lack of disciple on YOUR part. You have no will and no self control. Well tough titty, you made your own bed so lay in it asshole. You can be better off anytime you want. All you have to do is get up off of your lazy dead ass and try. It's not anyone else's job, it's yours.

I'm in college now, after having worked years with backbreaking labor in Landscaping & a Pet store for a measely 16 dollars an hour.

Some of the hardest workers make the lowest salaries.

While many company owners make a bundle outsourcing jobs & importing ilkegals to cut our throats.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

They're more efficient, they need fewer workers and can offer lower prices.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

And all their satisfied customers.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

Idiot is what you are, when it comes to economics. No code needed.

If we continue lose jobs how are we going to even afford those lower prices?

You as all Induvidualists are basically clueless savages.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

The efficiency has not propelled forward Amazons wages to the extent of job losses caused directly by Amazon.

They're more efficient, they need fewer workers and can offer lower prices.

The only winner is Bezos & maybe a few of his executives.

And all their satisfied customers.

Individualist is codeword for someone who is mentally & emotionally detached & impaired.

Idiot is what you are, when it comes to economics. No code needed.

If we continue lose jobs how are we going to even afford those lower prices?

You as all Induvidualists are basically clueless savages.

If we continue lose jobs how are we going to even afford those lower prices?

Over 90% of Americans once worked on farms.
If we only have 2% working on farms today, how will Americans even be able to afford the cheaper food?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

This affects you or rather your parents since you're in the high tax commuter zone of Gotham
And it's on topic target ...something the left wingers have a real hard time with


Democrats try to restore a tax cut for the rich
by Washington Examiner
| December 15, 2019 12:00 AM

Some people may be surprised to see Democrats fighting to expand a tax deduction for the wealthy. We are not.

It makes perfect sense, if you think about it.
The House Ways and Means Committee voted nearly along party lines to repeal a part of the 2017 Republican tax cut. But it wasn’t the corporate-rate cut Democrats were targeting. It wasn’t some imagined tax cut for corporate jets. Rather, Democrats passed a bill to scrap the cap on very-high-income individuals’ ability to deduct their state and local taxes on their federal tax returns.

The deduction for state and local taxes, or SALT, still exists. Republicans merely capped the deduction at $10,000. Since Republicans also doubled the standard deduction, this cap really only affects the uberwealthy. To repeat, after more than a decade of campaigning against "tax cuts for the rich," Democrats are now fighting tooth and nail for a special interest deduction that helps only the wealthy.

Democrats call their bill the Restoring Tax Fairness for States and Localities Act, but it should be titled, “Expanding Tax Breaks for Wealthy White Suburban Democratic Voters Act.” Expanding the deduction won’t help most taxpayers in New York, California, or New Jersey. It will help only those whose incomes or property values are very high.

“It is too simple to say that the deduction only benefits high-tax states,” Nicole Kaeding at the Tax Foundation recently testified. “It is better understood as benefiting high-income individuals, many of whom reside in high-tax jurisdictions with high housing values.”
If the Democratic bill becomes law, it would not cut taxes for any families whose total deductible expenses, including state and local taxes, are below $24,000; those taxpayers will still take the standard deduction as current law allows. The Democratic bill would not cut taxes for anyone whose state and local income taxes add up to less than $10,000. In other words, this can in no way be mistaken for a middle-class tax cut.


Read the rest at the Washington Examiner

Democrats cut taxes = bad.
Republicans cut taxes = good.

Got it.

Wow way to spin and project like a leftard
That's a disappointment

You're bitching about tax cuts for the rich ....I gave you something you we're just bitching about ...

I'm a right wing capitalist pig

tax cuts , deregulation and hang john brennan at dawn for all

In the 1950's we had a top bracket tax rate of 91%.

1950's economy was good, infrastructure was good, and debt was far lower.

Presumably if we didn't budge that down to less than half of that, we wouldn't have all this debt.

We could use more taxes to pay off the debt, and build newer, and better infrastructure.

In the 1950's we had a top bracket tax rate of 91%.

1950's economy was good, infrastructure was good, and debt was far lower.

Most of our economic competition had been bombed into rubble.

Presumably if we didn't budge that down to less than half of that, we wouldn't have all this debt.

Do tax rates impact behavior?

With the loopholes the actual tax bracket was around 40%. Same as now.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.
We need another Teddy Roosevelt.

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition, and then jack up prices.

Lol, Bezos is like Rockerfeller.

So what?

Bezos has taken away a ton of jobs.

Higher efficiency tends to do that.

Monopolies tend to undercut competition,

Amazon is a monopoly? What do they monopolize? Be specific.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

We are losing out as a society.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Considering that Amazon warehouse workers don't make much more or less than the numerous stores Bezos has collapsed.

Wow! Your specific statistics are very convincing.

Societal thinking is a bit complex for an Individualist savage.

Math and economics is tough for a stupid Pole.

Math is tough subject for a Germ-Man Individualist savage, or any Individualist.

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Significant Retail Job Losses At Private-Equity Backed Companies Should Worry Us

Approx 1 million retail jobs lost.
Amazon is definitely a large culprit.

Efficiency does that.

Have you taken any econ classes?

People said the same thing about ice delivery men. One cannot stop progress. How many jobs has the internet killed? Carriage makers were really angry at car manufacturers and candle makers must have hated electricity. Evolution and progress suck.

 

[Dick Foster]

You want to tax people, because you don't like what they'll do with their own money?

Nice!

Civilization requires taxation.

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I see Brits as outliers of civilization, especially ones in the USA.

Basically a bunch of uncivilized coots, vagabonds, and social misfits traveled into Britain from mainland Europe as invading armies., and then those who were even too uncivilized, vagabond, and misfit for Great Britain traveled to the United States.

Civilization requires taxation.

Does it require taxation to prevent people from freely spending their money in ways that you dislike?

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I've seen some Polish idiots who don't grasp it.

As if Bezos needs more money, who Bezos has more money than he knows to do with, largely by ridding the country of many of his competitors & shops, which in return diminishes jobs because he took away a ton of jobs & consolidated them into his crappy Amazon warehouses, where he borderline oppresses his employees with watches which time & track his employees, (Something straight out of Orwell's 1984)

Lol, Poles get most things correct, Brits get most things incorrect.

Germans don't get much correct, either.

Western Europeans in general are racial scums, the disaster race.

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

Shitforbrains here's a tip, Bezos made his money giving people what they wanted. That's how capitalism works. It works by earning money not by confiscating or sealing it.

 

[Indeependent]

You want to tax people, because you don't like what they'll do with their own money?

Nice!

Civilization requires taxation.

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I see Brits as outliers of civilization, especially ones in the USA.

Basically a bunch of uncivilized coots, vagabonds, and social misfits traveled into Britain from mainland Europe as invading armies., and then those who were even too uncivilized, vagabond, and misfit for Great Britain traveled to the United States.

Civilization requires taxation.

Does it require taxation to prevent people from freely spending their money in ways that you dislike?

Mostly just British idiots don't grasp it.

I've seen some Polish idiots who don't grasp it.

As if Bezos needs more money, who Bezos has more money than he knows to do with, largely by ridding the country of many of his competitors & shops, which in return diminishes jobs because he took away a ton of jobs & consolidated them into his crappy Amazon warehouses, where he borderline oppresses his employees with watches which time & track his employees, (Something straight out of Orwell's 1984)

Lol, Poles get most things correct, Brits get most things incorrect.

Germans don't get much correct, either.

Western Europeans in general are racial scums, the disaster race.

As if Bezos needs more money,

We should tax him more, because YOU think he doesn't need more money?

Lol, Poles get most things correct,

Based on you, not so much.

So, Bezos needs 109 billion, but the poor deserve nothing.
Especially considering that Bezos is a net job destroyer, not a real job creator.
Talk about a primitive, and idiotic view of the World.

Poles get almost everything correct, its you dubious Western Europeans who seem to severely struggle for rationale, or morals.

Bezos started around 1998, busted his ass and, unlike Gates and the rest of the Silicon Valley scum, never testified before Congress that anyone not from India is retarded.
Amazon almost went bust a few years ago and I personally know several dozen people who run their businesses on Amazon and they own very nice homes.