Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you don't like the concept of freedom why not move to Cuba rather than subvert America???
It has nothing to do with courage
merica is based on the philosophy of freedom this is why the Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb and why they elected Obama to give
merica is based on the philosophy of freedom this is why the Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb and why they elected Obama to give
The tax cuts were originally sold as an economic windfall in the form of increased consumer spending and revenues. That was, of course, a load of horsecrap. 37 years and several goalpost moves later, the economic argument in favor of such dumb policy has all but vanished and in its place is this zombie philosophical argument intended to avoid reality and facts in favor of emotion and hysterics.
Also, that argument is disproved by the data we saw from the Bush Tax Cuts. "Letting people keep more of what they earn" from 2001-2009 resulted in the worst economic growth in 80 years, a net loss of 460,000 private sector jobs, and the skyrocketing of household debt. So you said that it's a good thing to "let people keep what they earned", even though the economics of that philosophy completely contradict you.
So you are sacrificing intellectual honesty for hysterical philosophy. For you, Freedom = debt. That's the result of the "freedom" you support.
wrong of course Republicans have tried to make debt illlegal for 200 years. Do you understandmerica is based on the philosophy of freedom this is why the Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb and why they elected Obama to give
The tax cuts were originally sold as an economic windfall in the form of increased consumer spending and revenues. That was, of course, a load of horsecrap. 37 years and several goalpost moves later, the economic argument in favor of such dumb policy has all but vanished and in its place is this zombie philosophical argument intended to avoid reality and facts in favor of emotion and hysterics.
Also, that argument is disproved by the data we saw from the Bush Tax Cuts. "Letting people keep more of what they earn" from 2001-2009 resulted in the worst economic growth in 80 years, a net loss of 460,000 private sector jobs, and the skyrocketing of household debt. So you said that it's a good thing to "let people keep what they earned", even though the economics of that philosophy completely contradict you.
So you are sacrificing intellectual honesty for hysterical philosophy. For you, Freedom = debt. That's the result of the "freedom" you support.
merica is based on the philosophy of freedom this is why the Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb and why they elected Obama to give
The tax cuts were originally sold as an
No replacement for Obamacare by capitalism because the consensus in the country is not large enough. Do you understand?That's why no Obamacare replacement plan despite 7 years of Conservatives screeching about repeal.
wrong of course Republicans have tried to make debt illlegal for 200 years. Do you understand
As the founding principle of our country. Do you understand?
So the more money a soviet government monopoly takes from people at gunpoint the more the economy will grow? Do you see why we are positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
wrong of course Republicans have tried to make debt illlegal for 200 years. Do you understand
Well, they did a shit job of that since Reagan tripled the debt, Bush the elder grew it 50% in four years, and Bush the dumber doubled it in 8. Add to that Conservatives trying to erase a surplus in 1998 (thankfully, Clinton vetoed that assault on our budget), and keeping the War on Turr off the books and who the hell are you talking about??
Supplementary spending bills don't hide spending, don't hide debt and aren't "off the books". DURR.
Yes, they certainly were. And are you now admitting that there was a ton of war spending?
[ they weren't. They clearly add to the deficit. That deficit is clearly seen in the debt. The votes are public and so is the spending.
[ they weren't. They clearly add to the deficit. That deficit is clearly seen in the debt. The votes are public and so is the spending.
Yes, they add to the deficit now. That's because Obama started actually counting it. Bush didn't. Supplemental budgets for the wars were passed, but not paid for, nor were they counted in the yearly overall budgets. But it matters very little. We spent trillions in Iraq for nothing. Thanks to that folloy, we have ISIS.
wrong of course Republicans have tried to make debt illlegal for 200 years. Do you understand
Well, they did a shit job of that since ??
They add to the deficit and the debt at the time the money is spent.
He may have starting adding the spending to the initial budget (assuming he actually submitted one) or stopped submitting supplementary spending bills for the wars. No actual accounting change occurred.
That spending was paid for, exactly as all other spending was paid for. Some with tax receipts and some with borrowing.
Of course they were.
Like so much of Obama's posturing.
It's true, thanks to Obama.
They know that if we switch to capitalism prices would be reduced about 80% and savings could be used to pay off the entire national debt in six years.No replacement for Obamacare by capitalism because the consensus in the country is not large enough. Do you understand?
No replacement because Conservatives don't know anything about health care.
