Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The title of this thread should actually read:
"Tea party showing its ability to wreak havok on the twisted liberal agenda come November!"
And all you liberal loons vociferously argued that it was an insignificant movement. As usual, you whiners were absolutely wrong!
LMAO!
Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.The title of this thread should actually read:
"Tea party showing its ability to wreak havok on the twisted liberal agenda come November!"
And all you liberal loons vociferously argued that it was an insignificant movement. As usual, you whiners were absolutely wrong!
LMAO!
Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
The title of this thread should actually read:
"Tea party showing its ability to wreak havok on the twisted liberal agenda come November!"
And all you liberal loons vociferously argued that it was an insignificant movement. As usual, you whiners were absolutely wrong!
LMAO!
Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
The basic constituency of the Tea Party has not changed 25%-30%...same numbers that supported Bush till the end. That 25%-30% is enough to swing a Republican primary.
Saddling a candidate with a Tea Party label in the general election will be the mark of death
Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.The title of this thread should actually read:
"Tea party showing its ability to wreak havok on the twisted liberal agenda come November!"
And all you liberal loons vociferously argued that it was an insignificant movement. As usual, you whiners were absolutely wrong!
LMAO!
Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
Don't even try to twist my words. You know damn good and well I don't play that shit with you.....Show me where my changing of the title mentions ''Tea Party Candidates"....Come on, you made the claim....Back it the fuck up, or simply shut the fuck up!Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
uh is there a point in that jumbled mess of lame personal attacks??
Face it, thus far the tea party has won a few primaries. However, the general will decide if they a viable or if career candidates like o'donnel will continue in their current occupation.
Also it's funny how you focus on the effects of tea party candidates with your attempt to change the title and then try to tell me that it's not about the tea party candidates. LOL
Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
In fact, democratics are now spending three times the advertizing AGAINST healthcare reform as they are FOR it....
Democrats spend on anti-health-reform advertisements - Sarah Kliff - POLITICO.com
Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
uh is there a point in that jumbled mess of lame personal attacks??
Face it, thus far the tea party has won a few primaries. However, the general will decide if they a viable or if career candidates like o'donnel will continue in their current occupation.
Also it's funny how you focus on the effects of tea party candidates with your attempt to change the title and then try to tell me that it's not about the tea party candidates. LOL
Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
The basic constituency of the Tea Party has not changed 25%-30%...same numbers that supported Bush till the end. That 25%-30% is enough to swing a Republican primary.
Saddling a candidate with a Tea Party label in the general election will be the mark of death
Looks like your theory is failing in Florida.... Rubio up big now...
Seventy-two percent (72%) of GOP voters now support Rubio, while just 45% of Democrats back Meek. Crist earns support from 33% of Democrats and 19% of Republicans. Voters not affiliated with either of the major parties break 42% Crist, 27% Rubio and 24% Meek.
Election 2010: Florida Senate - Rasmussen Reports
Bummer for you... maybe you have to pay Kantar for the details....Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
In fact, democratics are now spending three times the advertizing AGAINST healthcare reform as they are FOR it....
Democrats spend on anti-health-reform advertisements - Sarah Kliff - POLITICO.com
Funny but I tried to dig a little deeper to see if i could find the data that Evan Tracey of kantar media and could only find two articles on their own website that are attributed to tracey and neither had to do with this topic.
Except the FACT that more Dems voted FOR 0bamascare than AGAINST, so the 3-to-1 numbers as mentioned in the article don't lend credence to your theory...A few questions, which democrats are spending money deriding the healthcare bill?? Is it the ones that voted agaisnt it in the first place?? If that is the case then that would make sense. What is the content of the ads?? Do they deride it because it didn't go far enough?? The politico article is vague and lacks the detail needed in order to make an informed decision.
However, a link within your article shows that at least five demcorats are running ads highlighting their votes against the healthcare but like I said that would make sense.
This is a scarey post right here.The bigger picture is that people are just fed up with career politicians.. from the left and the right. Who can't applaud that? Even Rove was on Hannity having a meltdown. I love it. Fuck 'em all. The Dem's are scared and the Repubs are scared. PERFECT!!
IOWS, replace career politicians with incompetents.
The basic constituency of the Tea Party has not changed 25%-30%...same numbers that supported Bush till the end. That 25%-30% is enough to swing a Republican primary.
Saddling a candidate with a Tea Party label in the general election will be the mark of death
Looks like your theory is failing in Florida.... Rubio up big now...
He is the only R on the ticket and crist running as an independent is only helping the right as moderates are voting for him where as the party firsters on the right are showing support for the candidate with an R after their name.
Seventy-two percent (72%) of GOP voters now support Rubio, while just 45% of Democrats back Meek. Crist earns support from 33% of Democrats and 19% of Republicans. Voters not affiliated with either of the major parties break 42% Crist, 27% Rubio and 24% Meek.
Election 2010: Florida Senate - Rasmussen Reports
Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.Actually the general will be the decider of whether the movement is significant or not. However, due to the fact that a lot of tea party candidates didn't even make it past the primaries, it's not looking real good for the movement.
It's funny how the tea party loyalists love to talk up the wins even as they pretty much ingore the losses.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
In fact, democratics are now spending three times the advertizing AGAINST healthcare reform as they are FOR it....
Democrats spend on anti-health-reform advertisements - Sarah Kliff - POLITICO.com
Don't even try to twist my words. You know damn good and well I don't play that shit with you.....Show me where my changing of the title mentions ''Tea Party Candidates"....Come on, you made the claim....Back it the fuck up, or simply shut the fuck up!Ya' see, once again you clearly show that you live in your loony lil' liberal bubble. Your lil' head is buried so far up your liberal ass that you can actually conversate with your back teeth.....It's not all about the tea party candididates. It's about ALL candidates. Candidates, particularly dem candidates, who are now scurrying away from Obama and his abject failings. The failings that the movement have thrust out front and center. Those candidtates who backed the asinine healthcare bill. The failed stimulus. Those who support the ridiculous Cap And Tax BS are going on the chopping block, as we all now see.
It's going to be quite entertaining listening to your usual lies, spin, and deflections come november.....Quite entertaining indeed!
uh is there a point in that jumbled mess of lame personal attacks??
Face it, thus far the tea party has won a few primaries. However, the general will decide if they a viable or if career candidates like o'donnel will continue in their current occupation.
Also it's funny how you focus on the effects of tea party candidates with your attempt to change the title and then try to tell me that it's not about the tea party candidates. LOL
Bummer for you... maybe you have to pay Kantar for the details....In fact, democratics are now spending three times the advertizing AGAINST healthcare reform as they are FOR it....
Democrats spend on anti-health-reform advertisements - Sarah Kliff - POLITICO.com
Funny but I tried to dig a little deeper to see if i could find the data that Evan Tracey of kantar media and could only find two articles on their own website that are attributed to tracey and neither had to do with this topic.
Have you tried calling Evan directly for comment?
Except the FACT that more Dems voted FOR 0bamascare than AGAINST, so the 3-to-1 numbers as mentioned in the article don't lend credence to your theory...A few questions, which democrats are spending money deriding the healthcare bill?? Is it the ones that voted agaisnt it in the first place?? If that is the case then that would make sense. What is the content of the ads?? Do they deride it because it didn't go far enough?? The politico article is vague and lacks the detail needed in order to make an informed decision.
However, a link within your article shows that at least five demcorats are running ads highlighting their votes against the healthcare but like I said that would make sense.
Perhaps you can find counter information that DOES support your theory...
Bummer for you... maybe you have to pay Kantar for the details....Funny but I tried to dig a little deeper to see if i could find the data that Evan Tracey of kantar media and could only find two articles on their own website that are attributed to tracey and neither had to do with this topic.
Have you tried calling Evan directly for comment?
Except the FACT that more Dems voted FOR 0bamascare than AGAINST, so the 3-to-1 numbers as mentioned in the article don't lend credence to your theory...A few questions, which democrats are spending money deriding the healthcare bill?? Is it the ones that voted agaisnt it in the first place?? If that is the case then that would make sense. What is the content of the ads?? Do they deride it because it didn't go far enough?? The politico article is vague and lacks the detail needed in order to make an informed decision.
However, a link within your article shows that at least five demcorats are running ads highlighting their votes against the healthcare but like I said that would make sense.
Perhaps you can find counter information that DOES support your theory...
Just looking for the facts that were left out but I did provide proof showing that some of those who voted against it are highlighting their votes which lends credence to my argument.
Furthermore, what does the ratio say about anything?? The article is subjective and even tries to minimize those ads from the left that do support the healthcare bill so who is to say that it's opinions on what supports the bill and what doesn't are on the up and up? However, since the details are not presented, there is no way to know for sure but you are more than welcome to continue to make your baseless assumptions if you want to but I try to make informed decisions. I just wish others would do the same.
Looks like your theory is failing in Florida.... Rubio up big now...
He is the only R on the ticket and crist running as an independent is only helping the right as moderates are voting for him where as the party firsters on the right are showing support for the candidate with an R after their name.
Seventy-two percent (72%) of GOP voters now support Rubio, while just 45% of Democrats back Meek. Crist earns support from 33% of Democrats and 19% of Republicans. Voters not affiliated with either of the major parties break 42% Crist, 27% Rubio and 24% Meek.
Election 2010: Florida Senate - Rasmussen Reports
That has nothing to do with leftwinger's remark that a candidate with a "Tea Party" label is the mark of death... Rubio is a "Tea Party" endorsed candidate...
Do pay attention, please...
Heathcare reform. I was for it, before I was against it. Now I'd like you to just forget the whole thing ever happened. - Dems in 2010
Sure dude, right after you lose the election. Forget and forgive.
