Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know O and the dems have problems when Gibbs is arguing in favor and alongside Rove against O Donnel. I mean, this is solid gold.
You know O and the dems have problems when Gibbs is arguing in favor and alongside Rove against O Donnel. I mean, this is solid gold.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
You know O and the dems have problems when Gibbs is arguing in favor and alongside Rove against O Donnel. I mean, this is solid gold.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
mccain would have won but for looking incompetent during the financial meltdown...and picking palin showed a lack of judgment.
different story.
i don't like angry anything... i have no problem with smart conservatives. they have an important role same as smart and compassionate liberals. i have a problem with stupid people, reactionaries and racists.... of any political persuasion. (and no, i'm not calling the bimbette a racist... i'm speaking generally).
You know O and the dems have problems when Gibbs is arguing in favor and alongside Rove against O Donnel. I mean, this is solid gold.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
mccain would have won but for looking incompetent during the financial meltdown...and picking palin showed a lack of judgment.
different story.
i don't like angry anything... i have no problem with smart conservatives. they have an important role same as smart and compassionate liberals. i have a problem with stupid people, reactionaries and racists.... of any political persuasion. (and no, i'm not calling the bimbette a racist... i'm speaking generally).
Oh, I know. You always have been pretty sensible!!! Bimbette? Isn't that sexist?
You know O and the dems have problems when Gibbs is arguing in favor and alongside Rove against O Donnel. I mean, this is solid gold.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
Tell us who would have done better in 2008 than McCain.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
what election are you referring to? ....
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
Tell us who would have done better in 2008 than McCain.
You got me. I don't think any R could have won two years ago. Likewise, I don't see O winning in 12. Probably won't be that close either. We could have a LOT of one termers if the economy stays in the crapper.
You just hit on the crux of problem. If there is little difference between the winner and loser of a primary, then the winner will have no problem picking up the votes of the loser in the general election. However, this not the case with most of the tea party candidates.The tea partiers just put an 11 point underdog into the race in Delaware, by defeating an 11 point favorite.
You just hit on the crux of problem. If there is little difference between the winner and loser of a primary, then the winner will have no problem picking up the votes of the loser in the general election. However, this not the case with most of the tea party candidates.The tea partiers just put an 11 point underdog into the race in Delaware, by defeating an 11 point favorite.
While a victory for a tea bagger in a primary may energize the far right, it is also likely to energize the left. Since Tea-baggers will need the support of moderate Republicans and often conservative Democrats, a Tea-bagger victory in the primary is not necessary a good thing for the Republicans in the general election.
Although Republicans could win the House, I think they have lost the Senate.
perhaps the more reasonable way of looking at it is that the candidate and tea partiers have major issue if karl rove and the white house ... and the entire republican establishment agree on a candidate.
occam's razor, yes?
Oh now, jillian. Remember, the establishment said to vote for McCain and he got whacked in a landslide. Besides, I thought yall wanted all those old, dirty, angry white males out of there, lol.
mccain would have won but for looking incompetent during the financial meltdown...and picking palin showed a lack of judgment.
different story.
i don't like angry anything... i have no problem with smart conservatives. they have an important role same as smart and compassionate liberals. i have a problem with stupid people, reactionaries and racists.... of any political persuasion. (and no, i'm not calling the bimbette a racist... i'm speaking generally).
Maybe the Tea Party is not by default Republican, but you can bet that just about every Tea-baggers will vote Republican. The Tea Party is the right wing of the Republican Party.You just hit on the crux of problem. If there is little difference between the winner and loser of a primary, then the winner will have no problem picking up the votes of the loser in the general election. However, this not the case with most of the tea party candidates.The tea partiers just put an 11 point underdog into the race in Delaware, by defeating an 11 point favorite.
While a victory for a tea bagger in a primary may energize the far right, it is also likely to energize the left. Since Tea-baggers will need the support of moderate Republicans and often conservative Democrats, a Tea-bagger victory in the primary is not necessary a good thing for the Republicans in the general election.
Although Republicans could win the House, I think they have lost the Senate.
You guys all miss the point. The Tea Party is not by default Republican. It is A grass roots conservative movement. It's goal is not to hand the Republicans Majority's, It is to Force the republicans back to our values.
It appears to me that you people are so wrapped up in Party politics you can not fathom that so many people are choosing Ideology over Party for a change.
Regardless of the outcome it is very refreshing to me.
This is a pretty good analogy. I also recall Repubs initially wetting themselves over the possiblity that the two parties may become one. Some even went so far as to say that THEY would like to Join the Tea Party.
This concept has yet to find a home in reality, but it's clear that the Repubs had better either help, or STFU and get out of the way.
NO MORE RINO'S
When will they ever learn?
NO MORE RINO'S
When you vote vote for your beliefs not your party
NO MORE RINO'S
In this case the people of Delaware would have prefered a RINO to the Democratic candidate
Now that their only choice is a Tea Bagger....they will go Dem
Whether you want RINOs elected or not makes no difference...it is the people doing the voting
I must say that i was ecstatic when i saw how much Karl Rove dislikes O'Donnell. I wanted to whip out my checkbook right away for her. If a phony Neocon Check Pant goon like Roves dislikes her,you know she's the right choice. Go get em O'Donnell!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AeJzpjefH4&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Karl Rove- There Are 'A Lot Of Nutty Things' O'Donnell's Been Saying[/ame]
