Techno-Tyrants try to Whack Dr. Roy Spencer

[gtopa1]

Welcome to my world, my Forum (at the time within the largest 15 climate forums in the world) was deliberately shut down with a barrage of lies by the Server host (who pretended that I DO NOT have my forum on their server) who was bought out by a large corporation the same corporation that also eliminated my password access to the 17-year-old Yahoo account where I had access to a hidden forum that actual scientists debated in on climate issues which in the early days had Dr. Mann and Dr. Schmidt participating in.

Could start another forum and refill part of it from the old forum, but that is a lot of work and with no help not worth it.

Huh??

I use DuckDuckGo; is this the site??

Global Warming Skeptics

Greg

 

[Old Rocks]

You having graph issues AGAIN? Or are our definitions of "rapid and significant" a bit different?

The 30 year trend line that USUALLY shows in the graph is at 0.14DegC/decade.
It's in his summary every month. Actually LAND = 0.18 and SEA = 0.12 or something like that -- which averages out to 0.14. (NOAA didn't like it that the seas were holding up DOOMSDAY on the calendar -- so they FUDGED new configurations of measuring sea based temperatures back around 2012 or so out of their 20,000 thermometer surface based temperature records)

Also why you dont SEE the Satellite record used much in the FEAR PORN section of GWarming papers.

That's 0.014DegC PER YEAR !!! ONE HUNDRED YEARS from now at THAT rate -- the world would be about 1.5DegC hotter.. YOU WORRIED ABOUT THAT GOLDIROCKS?

This is why the political generals running what's LEFT of CATASTROPHIC Global Warming Fear Train have resorted to NOT TALKING about the future and giving us this SILLY ASS "deadlines" on when it's TOO LATE to save the planet.

When the last real GW Headline you SAW in the mainstream media on Page 1 about "New Study Shows the Temperature in 2100 will BAKE EGGS ON THE SIDEWALK" ??? LOL..

Also why you dont SEE the Satellite record used much in the FEAR PORN section of GWarming science papers.

LOL Well, between the high and low on the UAH graph we see 1.4 C. In just 42 years. Kind of makes you look like a really dumb fuck.

 

[Old Rocks]

Only after RSS corrected Spencer and Chrsty's fake data, as you well know!

Prior to that correction, Spencer had been accusing others of fraud. Now his credibility is hanging by a thread, one more 'error' and he will be regarded in the same light as Singer and Lindzen.

 

[Old Rocks]

You seem upset? Need a safe space?

Not at all, when I am around, it is lying fucks that need a safe space.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not at all, when I am around, it is lying fucks that need a safe space.

Old man, you make me laugh. But I am laughing at you not with you.

 

[Indeependent]

One major mistake here. Whether or not Google allows you to make a profit off material you post on their site - or even whether or not they allow you on at all - is NOT a question of free speech. For christ's sake, read the fucking Constitution.

Why do you think YouTube has disabled the Dislike button?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

LOL Well, between the high and low on the UAH graph we see 1.4 C. In just 42 years. Kind of makes you look like a really dumb fuck.

Yeah, yesterday it was hot as hell in Boston. We had one of the worst snow storms ever recorded. You sound dumb. Likely cause you are. Earth is warming. There is little proof that it’s due to mankind. Even less proof that we can make it better via idiot Democratic policies.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/20/925736276/google-abuses-its-monopoly-power-over-search-justice-department-says-in-lawsuit#:~:text=The%20Justice%20Department%20filed%20an,confront%20a%20technology%20giant's%20power.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

One major mistake here. Whether or not Google allows you to make a profit off material you post on their site - or even whether or not they allow you on at all - is NOT a question of free speech. For christ's sake, read the fucking Constitution.

You seem upset again. Par for the course for you. Google has been in front of Congress on several occasions now for various questionable acts. Guess Congress is just paranoid.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/20/925736276/google-abuses-its-monopoly-power-over-search-justice-department-says-in-lawsuit#:~:text=The%20Justice%20Department%20filed%20an,confront%20a%20technology%20giant's%20power.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Huh??

I use DuckDuckGo; is this the site??

Global Warming Skeptics

Greg

Same link to myforum I posted, it seen because of the Wayback Machine.

They must like me because you can read a lot of the board inward which is unusual.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yeah, yesterday it was hot as hell in Boston. We had one of the worst snow storms ever recorded. You sound dumb. Likely cause you are. Earth is warming. There is little proof that it’s due to mankind. Even less proof that we can make it better via idiot Democratic policies.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/20/925736276/google-abuses-its-monopoly-power-over-search-justice-department-says-in-lawsuit#:~:text=The%20Justice%20Department%20filed%20an,confront%20a%20technology%20giant's%20power.

LOL Great. You can have more fun this week. LOL Quite on the contrary, there is nothing but proof that it is due entirely to the burning for fossil, 110% due to mankind's actions. Hell, all you super tough 'Conservatives' should be just regarding this as a bit of fun. LOL

 

[flacaltenn]

Only after RSS corrected Spencer and Chrsty's fake data, as you well know!

You still living 3 decades back in the days when a misplaced "-" sign caused a 0.01% error huh?

UAH NOW up to 4th or 5th revision. Hit me with all the NEWER "errors" that you've found.

 

[Sunsettommy]

LOL Great. You can have more fun this week. LOL Quite on the contrary, there is nothing but proof that it is due entirely to the burning for fossil, 110% due to mankind's actions. Hell, all you super tough 'Conservatives' should be just regarding this as a bit of fun. LOL

Global Warming

More Snow Hits the Fan this Week: Climate Change Alarmists Still Want it Both Ways​

January 31st, 2022 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Excerpt:

As I predicted, climate change has been blamed for the recent New England blizzard (e.g. from Bloomberg here). During that storm, Boston tied its 24-hr snowfall record at 23.6 inches.

Yet, as recently as January 6, we were told by USAToday that Boston’s lengthy 316-day streak *without* one inch of snowfall as of January 1st was caused by global warming.

So, which is it? Global warming causes less snow, or more snow?

When science produces contradictory claims, is it really science?

LINK

======

Warmist/alarmists make up your mind!

 

[flacaltenn]

LOL Well, between the high and low on the UAH graph we see 1.4 C. In just 42 years. Kind of makes you look like a really dumb fuck.

OMG.. I thought CRICK was only one so incapable of reading a graph.

But FIRST -- why do you NOT believe in trend lines to determine rates? Are you one of those math is racist types? Think the regression algorithm is WRONG or in DENIAL?

I read about -0.3 to +0.35.. Let's see if I can do this WITHOUT a calculator or a "LYING ASS" trend line. Would that be about +0.65 or NOT you whacked out assertion of 1.4DegC in the history of that record? YEAH -- think so..

Now here's the 7th grade math part. 2021 - 1979 == ???

What is 0.65DegC/years?

From all my sanity checking and estimation here -- I GET A TREND LINE OVER ALL YEARS to be about 0.15Deg/Decade. WITHOUT A FANCY RACIST regression algorithm. Dr Roy says it's 0.14.

What's your problem GoldiRocks? Are you just trying to sling shit and hope it sticks? If you're not just devious and dishonest -- maybe those beer glasses need to be re-checked.

 

[flacaltenn]

Global Warming

More Snow Hits the Fan this Week: Climate Change Alarmists Still Want it Both Ways​

January 31st, 2022 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Excerpt:

As I predicted, climate change has been blamed for the recent New England blizzard (e.g. from Bloomberg here). During that storm, Boston tied its 24-hr snowfall record at 23.6 inches.

Yet, as recently as January 6, we were told by USAToday that Boston’s lengthy 316-day streak *without* one inch of snowfall as of January 1st was caused by global warming.

So, which is it? Global warming causes less snow, or more snow?

When science produces contradictory claims, is it really science?

LINK

======

Warmist/alarmists make up your mind!

These zealots have wasted MORE raw newspaper with these sob stories and fear porn than there are TREES in Delaware.

 

[Sunsettommy]

These zealots have wasted MORE raw newspaper with these sob stories and fear porn than there are TREES in Delaware.

Yeah, and they are WEATHER events not climate change that is how messed up they are.

In my area there has been no real change in the climate trend since the mid 1960's when I moved from Missoula Mt. to Richland Wa. it is still hot and dry the databased averages are very close since the 1960's.

Weather varies every year, but the climate of the Columbia Basin is still the same hot and dry with little snowfall.

 

[flacaltenn]

Yeah, and they are WEATHER events not climate change that is how messed up they are.

In my area there has been no real change in the climate trend since the mid 1960's when I moved from Missoula Mt. to Richland Wa. it is still hot and dry the databased averages are very close since the 1960's.

Weather varies every year, but the climate of the Columbia Basin is still the same hot and dry with little snowfall.

Whatever happened to the "gold plated" USHCN temperature system? Did they bury that because it showed that the more thermometers you HAVE and DONT IGNORE wasnt showing ENOUGH GW in the US? LOL...

Last time I looked -- ANYWHERE in the US I've lived was showing about 20% less GW than NOAA or GISS or Euro for N. Hemisphere....

Think they replaced all that with devious re-analysis methods like OldiRocks likes to quote where they can PICK and choose the thermometers they want to SEED the modeling on a day by day basis.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You still living 3 decades back in the days when a misplaced "-" sign caused a 0.01% error huh?

UAH NOW up to 4th or 5th revision. Hit me with all the NEWER "errors" that you've found.

I spent a lot of effort with this difficult climate cultist over 2 years ago who really hates Dr. Spencer when I posted the actual published paper by the UAH team admitting to the error and thanking Dr. Wentz for pointing it out.

Then I posted the Wikipedia link showing all the small errors getting cleared up when pointed out or discovered by themselves in rapid speed.

He still clung to the idea that UAH is junk because it had errors in them which I repeatedly pointed out has been corrected, he ignores that hard evidence.

 

[jc456]

Whatever happened to the "gold plated" USHCN temperature system? Did they bury that because it showed that the more thermometers you HAVE and DONT IGNORE wasnt showing ENOUGH GW in the US? LOL...

Last time I looked -- ANYWHERE in the US I've lived was showing about 20% less GW than NOAA or GISS or Euro for N. Hemisphere....

Think they replaced all that with devious re-analysis methods like OldiRocks likes to quote where they can PICK and choose the thermometers they want to SEED the modeling on a day by day basis.

This ^^^^^

 

[Sunsettommy]

Whatever happened to the "gold plated" USHCN temperature system? Did they bury that because it showed that the more thermometers you HAVE and DONT IGNORE wasnt showing ENOUGH GW in the US? LOL...

Last time I looked -- ANYWHERE in the US I've lived was showing about 20% less GW than NOAA or GISS or Euro for N. Hemisphere....

Think they replaced all that with devious re-analysis methods like OldiRocks likes to quote where they can PICK and choose the thermometers they want to SEED the modeling on a day by day basis.

It is there and still being updated daily despite that many warmist/alarmists lies about it being obsolete.

LINK

 

[ding]

For anyone that doesn't know who Dr. Spencer is -- for about 40 years, he and Dr. Christy have been in charge of the UAH Satellite Data processing for Global Mean Earth temperature. It's ALWAYS been a joint venture with NOAA and NASA. They are one of two centers that process the data into temperatures by regions on the earth. (the other is RSS) Even tho the 2 sites use diff algorithms, there's exceptional agreement in the results. And these results are used WORLDWIDE by the GW science community.

Dr Roy has his OWN site where he publicly makes available the LATEST chart every month and weighs in on other things meteorological and Global Warming.

Well Dr. Roy JUST GOT GOOGLED. That's right. Those Liberal Arts Woking Dead fact checkers demonitized his blog. Not that STOPS the blog in any way. The amount he collected probably just paid the yearly hosting dues for a fairly simple site.

SURE -- a degree in Lativian History qualifies you to be a "misinformation sleuth" when it comes to funny looking graphs that dont look like every other graph they've seen on the web so KILL IT !!!

If you asked them to READ the graph and figure out how much GW in their lifetime they'd probably GOOGLE YOU.

Here's what Dr Spencer announced recently.

Roy Spencer, PhD

“Unreliable and harmful claims”: This website has been demonetized by Google
January 7th, 2022


DrRoySpencer.com has been demonetized by Google for “unreliable and harmful claims”. This means I can no longer generate revenue to support the website using the Google Adsense program.

From a monetary standpoint, it’s not a big deal because what I make off of Google ads is in the noise level of my family’s monthly budget. It barely made more than I pay in hosting fees and an (increasingly expensive) comment spam screener.

I’ve been getting Google warnings for a couple months now about “policy violations”, but nowhere was it listed what pages were in violation, and what those violations were. There are Adsense rules about ad placement on the page (e.g. a drop-down menu cannot overlay an ad), so I was assuming it was something like that, but I had no idea where to start looking with hundreds of web pages to sift through. It wasn’t until the ads were demonetized that Google offered links to the pages in question and what the reason was.

Of course, I should have figured out it was related to Google’s new policy about misleading content; a few months ago Google announced they would be demonetizing climate skeptic websites. I was kind of hoping my content was mainstream enough to avoid being banned since:

I believe the climate system has warmed
I believe most of this warming is probably due to greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning

Many of you know that I defend much of mainstream climate science, including climate modeling as an enterprise. Where I depart of the “mainstream” is how much warming has occurred, how much future warming can be expected, and what should be done about it from an energy policy perspective.

From the information provided by Google about my violations, in terms of the number of ads served, by far the most frequented web pages here at drroyspencer.com with “unreliable and harmful claims” are our (UAH) monthly global temperature update pages. This is obviously because some activists employed by Google (who are probably weren’t even born when John Christy and I received both NASA and American Meteorological Society awards for our work) don’t like the answer our 43-year long satellite dataset gives. Nevermind that our dataset remains one of the central global temperature datasets used by mainstream climate researchers in their work.

For now I don’t plan on appealing the decision, because it’s not worth the aggravation. If you are considered a “climate skeptic” (whatever that means) Google has already said you are targeted for termination from their Adsense program. I can’t expect their liberal arts-educated “fact checkers” to understand the nuances of the global warming debate.

We're just gonna continue letting the Techno-Tyrants putting their big asses on EVERY ASPECT of free speech and debate and ATTACK the very innate skeptical nature of science. The people they hire to MAKE these calls are NOT QUALIFIED to judge scientific discussion and CERTAINLY NOT qualified to decide what's dangerous discussion or debate. I've degoogled my life best I can. Suggest others do the same. But to let you know -- YOU CAN NOT BE FREE OF THEM anymore. They have hooked up with the OTHER techno-tyrants to put you where they want you.

Waiting for the puff of smoke to take out my computer.

We have gone through the looking glass when corporations try to impose their morals on society. It's a sad day for freedom and liberty and truth and justice.

On a side note the series Billions is parodying exactly this behavior. It's hilarious. The irony is though that at the end of the day it's all about money to google. They take these moral positions because they believe it will ultimately make them more money.