No one was taking away interracial marriage between a man and a woman—damned liars.
You completely missed the point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one was taking away interracial marriage between a man and a woman—damned liars.
Thomas said that the court needs to re-visit the decisions that allowed for same sex marriage. Now there will be a law that ensures it remains legal (unlike Abortion). It's a preventative measure against the nation turning into Conservistan.
The only side trying to criminalize rights is your side.
"Your speech is violence, our violence is speech"
"Normal" people are free to believe what they want. They just can't break the law to do it.
You want to be a homophobic bigot, do it on your own time.
Why do you think the leftists tacked on interracial marriage.
When did I say you did?
You did quote me addressing the claim that defending gay marriage was 'evil'......and then tried to change the topic.
Demonstrating my point elegantly. Whenever pressed to demonstrate why we gay marriage is wrong, your ilk change the topic. Which is why y'all lost the gay marriage debate.
Why do you think the leftists tacked on interracial marriage.
So the hateful republicans won't try to strip away that right either
typical lib, when defeated by facts and truth, post a foolish picture.
Irrelevant to the topic,. Doing so by choice has nothing to do with the shameless bigotry that you promote. Get the fuck out of here!
Look up Gish Gallop. Now that is fooish and the last resort of someone who has the communication skills of a turnip
Now I can add stupid to the long list of things that you are. You can't be fucking serious.!What bigotry? What group am a discriminating against by saying a marriage should be 1 man and one woman?
Now I can add stupid to the long list of things that you are. You can't be fucking serious.!
You have an irrational annimosity towards gay people because they do not do something according to a way that you approve of( having children) As a result you advocate ounishing then and depriving them of certain rights.
In addition, no thinking person will believe that your position is just about how they have kids. There is more more to this that you are too much of a coward to admit.
The proof of that is that you have no problems with opposite sex couple who cannot have kids in a way that you approve of
How the fuck am I discriminating against the disabled.? What disabled? I chided you for being ok with marriage for hetero couples who can't have children WHEN YOU DISAPPROVE OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE. If you think that you can twist that to mean that I want to deny those hetero couple marriage, you are even sicker than I thoughtYet you think it’s appropriate to discriminate against the disabled.
And I’m the bigot?
Typical batr shit crazt right winger. The disgussion is about gay marriage and you bring up illegals, inflation, AGW, senile Joe, crazy nancy,etc. GISH GALLOP!typical lib, when defeated by facts and truth, post a foolish picture.
you asked what is liberal weird shit, I gave you several examples.Typical batr shit crazt right winger. The disgussion is about gay marriage and you bring up illegals, inflation, AGW, senile Joe, crazy nancy,etc. GISH GALLOP!
The topic is same sex marriage. Gish Gallop!you asked what is liberal weird shit, I gave you several examples.
How the fuck am I discriminating against the disabled.? What disabled? I chided you for being ok with marriage for hetero couples who can't have children WHEN YOU DISAPPROVE OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE. If you think that you can twist that to mean that I want to deny those hetero couple marriage, you are even sicker than I thought
Ya know, I can't figure out if you are insane, a manipulative socio path ot just plain stupid!
So the hateful republicans won't try to strip away that right either
Putting asside for a minute that gay people have children, know this: Producing children is not a requirement for marriage. In there years before Obergefell was decided, there were dozens of of cases heard in the lower courts on the issue.This has been discussed before.
Marriage has always been between a man and a woman because it takes a part of both to create a child.
You asserted that some couples can’t have children.
Yes, there are some opposite sex couples that cannot have children. Many because of a reproductive disability. Yet they retain the qualification of one being male and the other female.
As a demographic group, it is still responsible for every child ever born, no matter what the sexuality of the two participants.
This is quite a huge difference from Same Sex couples who, regardless of the sexuality of the partners, have never created a single child.