Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Treaties and Sanctions by the UN were designed to stop Iran from going Nuclear............They aren't working and haven't been working. Iran is increasing it's tech and the only option to set them back is to hit the dang sites as they will not comply.Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.all this Netanyahu crap isn't doing a very good job deflecting the Republicans ass whippin' they gave themselves today when the caved like little girls over the HS bill ...
What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
What exactly is their agenda?
Is that what you think the treaty is? To allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? That's crazy.
The whole fiction of the Iranian nuclear program is for energy. Or didn't you know that?Incorrect.Fifteen minutes before little bulldog posted this, Netanyahu said that some people would tell us that the only alternative to the present course, was war. But, he said, that is NOT the only alternative. The alternative is A BETTER DEAL.So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
One that the mewling liberals think is impossible... mostly because they don't think. They merely tremble and cry.
Netanyahu saw people like little bulldog coming a mile away.
I heard what he said, and his claim of a better deal is one where Iran capitulates everything. That isn't going to happen. Sure, we need the best deal possible, and without certain assurances, it will never be signed, but it is unreasonable for Netanyahu to expect the agreement to only go one way. The deal he demands is impossible. Having said that, the only alternative is war. I don't want that.
Iran was intractable prior to sanctions against them. It was the sanctions that forced them to even consider going to the negotiation table.
Rejecting this deal and proposing one in which they [Iran] can have a national energy program that does not include the development of nuclear weapons is the only viable alternative. If they refuse to negotiate on those terms or refuse to continue talks, then you double down on the sanctions. Squeeze them economically to the point that their economy collapes, and then squeeze them some more.
There is no need for a hot war.
I'm not aware of any energy program that requires nuclear weapons, and if you think that is the treaty being negotiated, you are wrong. Netanyahu wants no nuclear capability at all for Iran. There is no reason why, with sufficient inspections, their energy program should be a problem.
Treaties and Sanctions by the UN were designed to stop Iran from going Nuclear............They aren't working and haven't been working. Iran is increasing it's tech and the only option to set them back is to hit the dang sites as they will not comply.Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.all this Netanyahu crap isn't doing a very good job deflecting the Republicans ass whippin' they gave themselves today when the caved like little girls over the HS bill ...
What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
What exactly is their agenda?
Is that what you think the treaty is? To allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? That's crazy.
Israel knows this, which is why it has destroyed these types of sites in Iraq and Syria in the past.
Why would anyone listen to Netanyahu?
Russia was never insanely suicidal and crazed with religion. You are an uneducated dolt who lacks even a cursory grasp of geopolitics.We lived with a nuclear Soviet Union. We live with a nuclear Russia.
While certainly not the optimum outcome, living with a nuclear Iran would not be the end of the world, no matter what Bibi says.
Israel has managed to bomb their facilities frequently without touching off a war. Saying there are only two options is a bit simplistic.Treaties and Sanctions by the UN were designed to stop Iran from going Nuclear............They aren't working and haven't been working. Iran is increasing it's tech and the only option to set them back is to hit the dang sites as they will not comply.Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.all this Netanyahu crap isn't doing a very good job deflecting the Republicans ass whippin' they gave themselves today when the caved like little girls over the HS bill ...
What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
What exactly is their agenda?
Is that what you think the treaty is? To allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? That's crazy.
Israel knows this, which is why it has destroyed these types of sites in Iraq and Syria in the past.
You wouldn't prefer inspections so we don't end up in a war over their energy policy? Nobody wants them to have a bomb, but I don't blame them for wanting nuclear energy. That's what inspections and monitoring is for. We can't do that without negotiating a treaty that allows that. War is the only other option.
Israel has managed to bomb their facilities frequently without touching off a war. Saying there are only two options is a bit simplistic.Treaties and Sanctions by the UN were designed to stop Iran from going Nuclear............They aren't working and haven't been working. Iran is increasing it's tech and the only option to set them back is to hit the dang sites as they will not comply.Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.all this Netanyahu crap isn't doing a very good job deflecting the Republicans ass whippin' they gave themselves today when the caved like little girls over the HS bill ...
What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
What exactly is their agenda?
Is that what you think the treaty is? To allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? That's crazy.
Israel knows this, which is why it has destroyed these types of sites in Iraq and Syria in the past.
You wouldn't prefer inspections so we don't end up in a war over their energy policy? Nobody wants them to have a bomb, but I don't blame them for wanting nuclear energy. That's what inspections and monitoring is for. We can't do that without negotiating a treaty that allows that. War is the only other option.
His bombing of Iranian facilities proves there are other options. We can see these places and their thermal signatures by satellite. A volley of cruise missiles can quickly eradicate their nuclear ambitions without starting a full scale war.Israel has managed to bomb their facilities frequently without touching off a war. Saying there are only two options is a bit simplistic.Treaties and Sanctions by the UN were designed to stop Iran from going Nuclear............They aren't working and haven't been working. Iran is increasing it's tech and the only option to set them back is to hit the dang sites as they will not comply.Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.
What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
What exactly is their agenda?
Is that what you think the treaty is? To allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? That's crazy.
Israel knows this, which is why it has destroyed these types of sites in Iraq and Syria in the past.
You wouldn't prefer inspections so we don't end up in a war over their energy policy? Nobody wants them to have a bomb, but I don't blame them for wanting nuclear energy. That's what inspections and monitoring is for. We can't do that without negotiating a treaty that allows that. War is the only other option.
That's your plan? Even Netanyahu said there were only three options. Negotiate a treaty, War, or Negotiate a better treaty. He didn't bother to mention what he thought that better treaty he mentioned would amount to.
I guess that in a couple of weeks we'll all find out how Bibi's campaign stop at the US Capitol helped him..........or not
I guess that in a couple of weeks we'll all find out how Bibi's campaign stop at the US Capitol helped him..........or not
Whether or not he's reelected, has not a thing to do with the speech. It wasn't aimed at the Israelis, all parties there recognize that if Iran has the bomb, they are in mortal danger.
If the 'deal' goes through, will Israel act alone? Perhaps. If not, time will tell if Obama or Netanyahu were correct. If the deal fails to come to fruition, he'll be remembered for being part of that.
You are correct. He is grossly uneducated and proud of it.Russia was never insanely suicidal and crazed with religion. You are an uneducated dolt who lacks even a cursory grasp of geopolitics.We lived with a nuclear Soviet Union. We live with a nuclear Russia.
While certainly not the optimum outcome, living with a nuclear Iran would not be the end of the world, no matter what Bibi says.
You dont think the fact that Obama's negotiations with Iran are a farce and will result in a nuclear Iran and a less safer world have anythign to do with it?The REAL "point" of this thread is not so much about Iran's nuclear ambitions,,,rather, it served to allow Obama haters to, once again, vent their animosity toward ANYTHING that this president has tried to accomplish.
