Texas denies anchor babies birth certificates

To bad every State doesn't follow Texas.

The constitution is everything, we must follow the constitution.

Can't get rid of guns, it's unconstitutional.


But we can get rid of US born even though it's unconstitutional. We can also stop gays getting married, stuff the constitution.
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
 
Loving these pro lifers right now, let's deny citizenship to children and send them back to extremely poor areas.
They are Pro-White-Fetus. That's as far as it goes.

You're the only one who's talking about pro white anything.

When ya got nothing start using the bigot and racist card.

You are so fucking predictable. LOL
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns

Also one hundred and twenty five years ago there were no illegals. I think the courts will look at it differently today.
 
Texas Denies Birth Certificates to Children of Immigrants

Good job Texas! Leading the nation in common sense once again!

Don't ever claim that the rule of law matters to you when some other issue is on the table.

Apparently you didn't read it either.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

No Visa. No birth certificate. And get a load of the Mexican cosulate giving matricula consular to Mexicans residing in America. Most of whom are illegals.

And yes I agree, they need to amend the amendment.
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.
You can think whatever you like but the highest court in the land has already addressed this issue and you lost, more than 100 years ago...
 
You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.

You can think whatever you like but the highest court in the land has already addressed this issue and you lost, more than 100 years ago...

No. I didn't lose. The taxpayers of America lost and will continue to lose.

Oh and facts are facts. They have no domicile and aren't here with the permission of the US Govt. and therefore have no visa's.

You can believe what you want and support what you want.

Oh and if Trump wins he will push for that amendment to the amendment and it will be good luck for we taxpayers.
 
Good for Texas. Spend millions defending an illegal decision just to pander to the haters
 
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.

You can think whatever you like but the highest court in the land has already addressed this issue and you lost, more than 100 years ago...

No. I didn't lose. The taxpayers of America lost and will continue to lose.

Oh and facts are facts. They have no domicile and aren't here with the permission of the US Govt. and therefore have no visa's.

You can believe what you want and support what you want.

Oh and if Trump wins he will push for that amendment to the amendment and it will be good luck for we taxpayers.
Enjoy your fantasy, since that's what it is.
 
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.

You can think whatever you like but the highest court in the land has already addressed this issue and you lost, more than 100 years ago...

No. I didn't lose. The taxpayers of America lost and will continue to lose.

Oh and facts are facts. They have no domicile and aren't here with the permission of the US Govt. and therefore have no visa's.

You can believe what you want and support what you want.

Oh and if Trump wins he will push for that amendment to the amendment and it will be good luck for we taxpayers.

Enjoy your fantasy, since that's what it is.

Why thank you. I certainly will.
 
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.

You can think whatever you like but the highest court in the land has already addressed this issue and you lost, more than 100 years ago...

No. I didn't lose. The taxpayers of America lost and will continue to lose.

Oh and facts are facts. They have no domicile and aren't here with the permission of the US Govt. and therefore have no visa's.

You can believe what you want and support what you want.

Oh and if Trump wins he will push for that amendment to the amendment and it will be good luck for we taxpayers.

Enjoy your fantasy, since that's what it is.

Why thank you. I certainly will.
Oh I'm absolutely certain of that since you don't live in the real world where laws and the Constitution actually matter when they don't go your way...
 
Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.
If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.
Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

  • is born in the United States
  • of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
  • whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
  • whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject
becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh and illegals have a permanent Domicile??

I think not since they are here illegally without the permission of the US Govt. and with out a Visa.
They do in Kalifornia.
 

Forum List

Back
Top