Texas Files Lawsuit at SCOTUS Against GA, PA, MI, and WI

[Sunsettommy]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Its good we're getting this out of our system during this election cycle so the next time we have a sore loser we won't have to worry about a month long tantrum.

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

Paxton is under indictment for one crime and under Federal Investigation for a number of others.
This is nothing but Paxton trying to stroke Trump in order to get a pardon

The SC is never going to even LOOK at this nonsense

DENIED

Bwahahahahahahaahaha!!!

SCOTUS already accepted the lawsuit, ordered the sued stated to respond to the lawsuit by 3 PM Thursday.

LINK

 

[Daryl Hunt]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

The Lawsuit is on you moron!

SCOTUS has accepted the lawsuit.

What has been presented is the application only. As of 5pm, SCOTUS has not accepted it. Maybe in the morning one way or another. You are jumping the gun once again and believing what the fruitcake and conspiracy sites are presenting. Hell, even the application may be false, we don't know. We'll give it the benefit and wait and see.

Damn, you part of the Rumpers will buy anything. Here's your sign.

 

[Doc7505]

Don’t Mess with Texas!
Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures
Texas goes directly to the Supreme Court, requesting the High Court to order these swing states with voting irregularities to allow their legislatures to appoint presidential electors.​

Don't Mess with Texas! Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures | The Stream
8 Dec 2020 ~~ By Al Perrotta
~[snip]~

Just before midnight, the State of Texas threw its massive weight into the election fraud fight. Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the grounds their ad-hoc changes to election procedures were unconstitutional. And as a result, violated the rights of Texans and those in other states that followed the constitution. Don’t mess with Texas, indeed.
What’s more, Texas isn’t fiddling around with lower courts. They marched straight to the Supreme Court. And they are requesting the Supreme Court order the offending states to allow their legislatures to appoint their presidential electors.
Dodging State Legislatures Was Dodgy
Breitbart was the first major outlet with the story, and breaks down the argument the Lone Star State is making.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.​

In their lawsuit, Texas claims “certain officials in the Defendant States” presented the COVID pandemic “as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in balloting.” As streiff at RedState noted, “there’s no pandemic escape hatch in the constitution.”
~[snip]~
Going to the Supreme Court…a Long Shot, Perhaps
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly, Breitbart reports, “because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.”
Is the Supreme Court going to hear the case? Twitchy has collected the early reaction of legal types, and the consensus seems to be it’s a long shot the Supreme Court will hear the case, let alone rule in Texas’ favor. Several commentators note that the suit was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, not the state’s solicitor general Kyle Hawkins, who would be the go-to person for suits like this.


Comment:
The Roberts court will either determine that it's none of Texas' business how other states do stuff or that the legistlatures were in session and aware of the changes and did not act, therefore they are implicitly the method determined by the legislature to be appropriate and so once again, buzz of Texas.
This case doesn’t require evidence, it hangs upon the law being changed illegally, before the election.
Every American voter in is being disenfranchised in this National Election by the States who were grossly negligent in their duties to conduct a free and fair election.
All States, who abided by their State Election Rules, should join with Texas and take the scoundrels to court.

Sounds great but states rarely ever win against other states
The US is over and done with

~~~~~~
I have a question.. If a state(s) uses fraud and illegal actions during a presidential election does it disenfranchise just the voters within that state(s) or all the citizens in the United States?

 

[aaronleland]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Are you telling me News Thud isn't a reputable news site? They're the most thudded name in news.

 

[Sunsettommy]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

The Lawsuit is on you moron!

SCOTUS has accepted the lawsuit.

What has been presented is the application only. As of 5pm, SCOTUS has not accepted it. Maybe in the morning one way or another. You are jumping the gun once again and believing what the fruitcake and conspiracy sites are presenting. Hell, even the application may be false, we don't know. We'll give it the benefit and wait and see.

Damn, you part of the Rumpers will buy anything. Here's your sign.
View attachment 426865

You are way out of date since SCOTUS has already accepted the lawsuit and directed the sued states to respond by 3 PM Thursday.

You are being an ass.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Are you telling me News Thud isn't a reputable news site? They're the most thudded name in news.

They make Foxnews in it's Hayday hide it's face in shame. Why tell the truth when a lie sounds better.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

The Lawsuit is on you moron!

SCOTUS has accepted the lawsuit.

What has been presented is the application only. As of 5pm, SCOTUS has not accepted it. Maybe in the morning one way or another. You are jumping the gun once again and believing what the fruitcake and conspiracy sites are presenting. Hell, even the application may be false, we don't know. We'll give it the benefit and wait and see.

Damn, you part of the Rumpers will buy anything. Here's your sign.
View attachment 426865

You are way out of date since SCOTUS has already accepted the lawsuit and directed the sued states to respond by 3 PM Thursday.

You are being an ass.

If they accepted it there would be a record of it by SCOTUS on file. You want me to believe it, let's see that record along with the case file.

 

[Sunsettommy]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

The Lawsuit is on you moron!

SCOTUS has accepted the lawsuit.

What has been presented is the application only. As of 5pm, SCOTUS has not accepted it. Maybe in the morning one way or another. You are jumping the gun once again and believing what the fruitcake and conspiracy sites are presenting. Hell, even the application may be false, we don't know. We'll give it the benefit and wait and see.

Damn, you part of the Rumpers will buy anything. Here's your sign.
View attachment 426865

You are way out of date since SCOTUS has already accepted the lawsuit and directed the sued states to respond by 3 PM Thursday.

You are being an ass.

If they accepted it there would be a record of it by SCOTUS on file. You want me to believe it, let's see that record along with the case file.

It is in the link you lazy reader!

Wait until tomorrow, there will be a lot more on this, then you will finally be forced to admit that it happened.

 

[candycorn]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Its good we're getting this out of our system during this election cycle so the next time we have a sore loser we won't have to worry about a month long tantrum.

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

Paxton is under indictment for one crime and under Federal Investigation for a number of others.
This is nothing but Paxton trying to stroke Trump in order to get a pardon

The SC is never going to even LOOK at this nonsense

DENIED

Bwahahahahahahaahaha!!!

SCOTUS already accepted the lawsuit, ordered the sued stated to respond to the lawsuit by 3 PM Thursday.

LINK

Again...no reputable sites are reporting this...YET.

 

[candycorn]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Are you telling me News Thud isn't a reputable news site? They're the most thudded name in news.

They make Foxnews in it's Hayday hide it's face in shame. Why tell the truth when a lie sounds better.

Not saying it didn't happen...just saying no reputable site is reporting it yet. We're still waiting for the US Army to produce the servers it seized in Germany.

 

[Doc7505]

USSC has become on the Democrat side with Roberts and Kav is a lemming

Today's vote was 6-3 doesn't sound like Roberts or Kavanaugh were whimpng out...

 

[westwall]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Its good we're getting this out of our system during this election cycle so the next time we have a sore loser we won't have to worry about a month long tantrum.

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

Paxton is under indictment for one crime and under Federal Investigation for a number of others.
This is nothing but Paxton trying to stroke Trump in order to get a pardon

The SC is never going to even LOOK at this nonsense

DENIED

Bwahahahahahahaahaha!!!

SCOTUS already accepted the lawsuit, ordered the sued stated to respond to the lawsuit by 3 PM Thursday.

LINK

Again...no reputable sites are reporting this...YET.

The MSM stopped being reputable years ago.

 

[Quasar44]

USSC has become on the Democrat side with Roberts and Kav is a lemming

Today's vote was 6-3 doesn't sound like Roberts or Kavanaugh were whimpng out...

The odds are low !
They should call all 4 states unconstitutional and send it back to the state Congress
Will they do that ???

Looks like T has officially given up on Nevada and Arizona. These 2 states is much harder to prove but the other 4 states were massive fraud

 

[Quasar44]

I know those 4 states were 100 percent stolen

 

[Roudy]

Don’t Mess with Texas!
Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures
Texas goes directly to the Supreme Court, requesting the High Court to order these swing states with voting irregularities to allow their legislatures to appoint presidential electors.​

Don't Mess with Texas! Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures | The Stream
8 Dec 2020 ~~ By Al Perrotta
~[snip]~

Just before midnight, the State of Texas threw its massive weight into the election fraud fight. Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the grounds their ad-hoc changes to election procedures were unconstitutional. And as a result, violated the rights of Texans and those in other states that followed the constitution. Don’t mess with Texas, indeed.
What’s more, Texas isn’t fiddling around with lower courts. They marched straight to the Supreme Court. And they are requesting the Supreme Court order the offending states to allow their legislatures to appoint their presidential electors.
Dodging State Legislatures Was Dodgy
Breitbart was the first major outlet with the story, and breaks down the argument the Lone Star State is making.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.​

In their lawsuit, Texas claims “certain officials in the Defendant States” presented the COVID pandemic “as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in balloting.” As streiff at RedState noted, “there’s no pandemic escape hatch in the constitution.”
~[snip]~
Going to the Supreme Court…a Long Shot, Perhaps
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly, Breitbart reports, “because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.”
Is the Supreme Court going to hear the case? Twitchy has collected the early reaction of legal types, and the consensus seems to be it’s a long shot the Supreme Court will hear the case, let alone rule in Texas’ favor. Several commentators note that the suit was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, not the state’s solicitor general Kyle Hawkins, who would be the go-to person for suits like this.


Comment:
The Roberts court will either determine that it's none of Texas' business how other states do stuff or that the legistlatures were in session and aware of the changes and did not act, therefore they are implicitly the method determined by the legislature to be appropriate and so once again, buzz of Texas.
This case doesn’t require evidence, it hangs upon the law being changed illegally, before the election.
Every American voter in is being disenfranchised in this National Election by the States who were grossly negligent in their duties to conduct a free and fair election.
All States, who abided by their State Election Rules, should join with Texas and take the scoundrels to court.

Big Texas Dick slams down on the table.

Everybody else knows what's at stake:
https://tnm.me/news/tnm-news/major-announcement-texit-legislation-filed-for-next-legislative-session
This is a not-so-veiled threat.

The SCOTUS ordered a response.

The equivalent of a fly pattern at the end of the fourth quarter. You can tell from today's SCOTUS ruling that they're not going to step in this shit. I place the blame on Trump's campaign advisors, they should have seen this coming a mile away and preempted it. We had a seriously defective candidate in Joe Biden hiding in the basement..this was a concerted effort at stealing this election across many states, the Democrats had placed their foot soldiers in various Democrat run cities and states and were preparing or should I say conspiring for this fraud for over 6 months, including how to cover their tracks. You gotta hand it to them they basically carried out an "Ocean's 11" of US elections.

 

[K9Buck]

Don’t Mess with Texas!
Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures
Texas goes directly to the Supreme Court, requesting the High Court to order these swing states with voting irregularities to allow their legislatures to appoint presidential electors.​

Don't Mess with Texas! Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for Unconstitutionally Changing Election Procedures | The Stream
8 Dec 2020 ~~ By Al Perrotta
~[snip]~

Just before midnight, the State of Texas threw its massive weight into the election fraud fight. Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the grounds their ad-hoc changes to election procedures were unconstitutional. And as a result, violated the rights of Texans and those in other states that followed the constitution. Don’t mess with Texas, indeed.
What’s more, Texas isn’t fiddling around with lower courts. They marched straight to the Supreme Court. And they are requesting the Supreme Court order the offending states to allow their legislatures to appoint their presidential electors.
Dodging State Legislatures Was Dodgy
Breitbart was the first major outlet with the story, and breaks down the argument the Lone Star State is making.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.​

In their lawsuit, Texas claims “certain officials in the Defendant States” presented the COVID pandemic “as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in balloting.” As streiff at RedState noted, “there’s no pandemic escape hatch in the constitution.”
~[snip]~
Going to the Supreme Court…a Long Shot, Perhaps
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly, Breitbart reports, “because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.”
Is the Supreme Court going to hear the case? Twitchy has collected the early reaction of legal types, and the consensus seems to be it’s a long shot the Supreme Court will hear the case, let alone rule in Texas’ favor. Several commentators note that the suit was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, not the state’s solicitor general Kyle Hawkins, who would be the go-to person for suits like this.


Comment:
The Roberts court will either determine that it's none of Texas' business how other states do stuff or that the legistlatures were in session and aware of the changes and did not act, therefore they are implicitly the method determined by the legislature to be appropriate and so once again, buzz of Texas.
This case doesn’t require evidence, it hangs upon the law being changed illegally, before the election.
Every American voter in is being disenfranchised in this National Election by the States who were grossly negligent in their duties to conduct a free and fair election.
All States, who abided by their State Election Rules, should join with Texas and take the scoundrels to court.

Big Texas Dick slams down on the table.

Everybody else knows what's at stake:
https://tnm.me/news/tnm-news/major-announcement-texit-legislation-filed-for-next-legislative-session
This is a not-so-veiled threat.

The SCOTUS ordered a response.

The equivalent of a fly pattern at the end of the fourth quarter. You can tell from today's SCOTUS ruling that they're not going to step in this shit. I place the blame on Trump's campaign advisors, they should have seen this coming a mile away and preempted it. We had a seriously defective candidate in Joe Biden hiding in the basement..this was a concerted effort at stealing this election across many states, the Democrats had placed their foot soldiers in various Democrat run cities and states and were preparing or should I say conspiring for this fraud for over 6 months, including how to cover their tracks. You gotta hand it to them they basically carried out an "Ocean's 11" of US elections.

Half the country and half the people on this forum are hellbent on turning the U.S. into a fascist, Chinese-style, one-party, oligarchy controlled by the Democratic Party. It's hard to preserve a nation when half its populace want to destroy it.

 

[Sunsettommy]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

No reputable sites are reporting it yet.

Its good we're getting this out of our system during this election cycle so the next time we have a sore loser we won't have to worry about a month long tantrum.

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

Paxton is under indictment for one crime and under Federal Investigation for a number of others.
This is nothing but Paxton trying to stroke Trump in order to get a pardon

The SC is never going to even LOOK at this nonsense

DENIED

Bwahahahahahahaahaha!!!

SCOTUS already accepted the lawsuit, ordered the sued stated to respond to the lawsuit by 3 PM Thursday.

LINK

Again...no reputable sites are reporting this...YET.

LOL, you are sooo lazy....

Really did you bother to LOOK here?

The Supreme Court of the United States

No. 22O155
Title:	Texas, Plaintiff v. Pennsylvania, et al.
Docketed:	December 8, 2020

DATE	PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS
Dec 07 2020	Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.
​	Motion for Leave to File a Bill of ComplaintCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
Dec 07 2020	Motion to expedite filed by plaintiff Texas.
​	Main Document
Dec 07 2020	Motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay filed by plaintiff Texas.
​	Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther
Dec 08 2020	Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm.

LINK

 

[Quasar44]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

ah, here is why



pandering for a pardon

No he is serious about the lawsuit:

State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit

LINK

No?

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

SCOTUS isn't a magic lamp that grants anti-democratic wishes. You have to actually "show harm" and "have a case" and "go through the appeals process."

Paxton hopes that by appeasing the MAGAs that they will overlook his bribery charges being investigated by the FBI.

The Lawsuit is on you moron!

SCOTUS has accepted the lawsuit.

This is our final last hope of any justice
Please let Cruz be head attorney and not Rudy .
Cruz is the smartest person in the entire Congress

 

[cnm]

and there may be other states to follow ! BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas election case suing four states | News Thud

What's the bet the USSC will deny its suit in one sentence too?

 

[Quasar44]

I am sure the Dems will threaten the USSC.