Texas Files Lawsuit at SCOTUS Against GA, PA, MI, and WI

[busybee01]

Those four states didn't follow the law in their state. The change in ballot approvals, per law in each of those states, was supposed to go through the state legislature. That didn't happen.

Yes they did. Your saying so does not make it true.

 

[busybee01]

Folks have mentioned it, but it is worth repeating. There are two possibilities to settle the vote fraud cases, assuming nothing crazy happens, and in both cases President Trump wins.

1) The states with the obvious voter fraud are actually controlled by Republican legislatures and since there is no way to sort out the mail in ballots and other voter fraud, the state legislatures will give their state Electoral votes for President Trump.

2) The states with the obvious voter fraud fail to respond with an alternative by Thursday, thus the House votes with each state getting a vote. Since there are more Republican states, President Trump will get more House votes and thus be re-elected. MAGA!

1. No voter fraud has been proven. What you want is for state legislatures to overturn the will of the people.

2. Since there was no voter fraud, they don't have to come up with anything. There is no such provision in the Constitution.

 

[cnm]

Big Texas Dick slams down on the table.

Everybody else knows what's at stake:
https://tnm.me/news/tnm-news/major-announcement-texit-legislation-filed-for-next-legislative-session
This is a not-so-veiled threat.

The SCOTUS ordered a response.

Please, please let the referendum be decided in the affirmative...

 

[Dr Grump]

Aren't right wing loons (generally) for state's rights? Wonder how Texarse would feel if NY decided it wanted to repeal Texarse's CCW laws?

 

[Mac-7]

With frauds Roberts and Kav ..not looking very good

I agree

dems need just one conservative judge to join roberts and the three stooges and they win 5-4

but it could go the other way also

 

[LoneLaugher]

This will go nowhere.

Those who cheer this kind of desperate legal ploy to try and overturn an election ought to take a long, hard look at themselves.

those who make these moves necessary should certainly do the same.

Nobody. Nobody made these desperate moves necessary.

 

[LoneLaugher]

This will go nowhere.

Those who cheer this kind of desperate legal ploy to try and overturn an election ought to take a long, hard look at themselves.

I think the criminals conducting voter fraud are the ones who should be looking at themselves. Then they should be locked up.

Didn't happen. You are a dupe who has zero regard for our system of free and fair elections.

All for a disinterested, incompetent grifter.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Allowing citizens to vote by mail during a pandemic emergency is not fraud.

People calling it fraud are way off base.

Will the candidates in the primary using this method be invalidated, and special election winners be evicted, along with all the candidates in the Nov 3 election be invalidated?

After the citizens were told by their govt that it was legal and to vote that way?

I do not think so.

And if it did go to the legislature or house, wouldnt they be obligated on their electors chosen, to be the electors of the citizen's choice...who clearly did choose Biden, not Trump, but a technicality and not fraud by the citizens, is the complaint?

Why weren't the constitutionality complaints brought and settled during the primaries and before the Nov elections?

There is no way the SC would change and usurp the will of the people at this point.

Voters Constitutional rights were violated. That is the issue. All legally cast votes should be considered exactly the same regardless of jurisdiction. That did not happen.

This is a very serious Constitutional question that must be resolved to protect all of our Rights. This should not be about team politics.

No it should not.

And every candidate has a right to redress through the courts, through recounts etc.

When court after court has dismissed cases for lack of evidence...when the lead attorney himself has to claim it's not fraud in order to avoid lying to the judge, when election officials on your own team say there is no evidence of fraud, when the DoJ fails to find fraud...then it's time to move on and accept the election as valid or...

make it about team politics and attempt to overturn a legitimate election and have partisan legislatures install the candidate who lost.

That invokes a greater crisis then your fraudulent one.

And making up Russia and forging evidence and spying did what for the good of the country? At least the right IS going 5hrough the courts vs the dems route.

The right is making up evidence not going through the courts.

What evidence did they "make up," the video of GA poll workers counting votes after they kicked out all the observers?

Yes. That didn't happen.

Next.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Those four states didn't follow the law in their state. The change in ballot approvals, per law in each of those states, was supposed to go through the state legislature. That didn't happen.

What you have said here is untrue.

 

[BULLDOG]

With frauds Roberts and Kav ..not looking very good

I agree

dems just need one conservative judge to join roberts and the three stooges and they win 5-4

but it could go the other way also

After decades of claiming moral superiority, the right threw that all away for the promise from an immoral president to let the religious nuts pick new supreme court justices. You got your pick. Do you think it was all worth it?

 

[Mac-7]

After decades of claiming moral superiority, the right threw that all away for the promise from an immoral president to let the religious nuts pick new supreme court justices. You got your pick. Do you think it was all worth it?

We’ll see

If hillary were president and had appointed three atheists we would have no hope at all

 

[CowboyTed]

In the suit, he claims that pandemic-era changes to election procedures in those states violated federal law, and asks the U.S. Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College."
Nevermind the fact that the election laws in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were passed by their own state legislatures, but Texas knows better...even tho when they tried to challenge their own state's election laws, they were laughed out of court.

My home is in Tennessee. I should allow the State legislatures in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan decide who my President is? Bullspit. This is a federal-not State-election.

Under your reasoning then one state can object to other Senators as well... Senators vote on decisions for all Americans...

So explain how the majority in the Senate has only 44% of the vote while 55% are in the minority...

 

[CowboyTed]

Well of course - Texas has every right to change election laws in all 57 states because, you know ... TEXAS!
Good lord, when will Republicans stop embarrassing themselves?

Who will make them pay for it?

Their voters?? Nope...

They are embarrassing themselves for their voters....

and when this is said and done, I guarantee you that these folks will get pissed if you ever remind them

Apparently you would prefer the people nationwide to pay for those States' "right" to defraud the the rest of the rest the United States. Voting fraud affects all Americans.

Allegations of fraud with no evidence shouldn't affect any Americans....

We are weeks now of the allegations of fraud... Where is the evidence... Evidence that will stand up in court...

Where is it?

No messages of 'it is coming' or 'it is everywhere'... Accusing people of a crime and having no evidence is a crime in itself...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Relax everyone, Ken Paxton is just trying to get a pardon....

Trump is a child so its practically that easy to get a pardon from him.....

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

In new lawsuit, Texas contests election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, experts say.

www.texastribune.org

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud -- In the suit, he claims that pandemic-era changes to election procedures in those states violated federal law, and asks the U.S. Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College."

In a brilliant move, Paxton does the same thing Democrats did back when they were filing lawsuits all over the place to stop Trump from being inaugurated....so what's fair is fair right??

Nevermind the fact that the election laws in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were passed by their own state legislatures, but Texas knows better...even tho when they tried to challenge their own state's election laws, they were laughed out of court...but anything for the God-King Trump...

We will all pretend this never happened later anyways, so why not....

Stupid is as Texas does.

Not so stupid. Everyone of those states changed election laws in violation of the Constitution. Its on another thread on this board. Texas has a very good case.

Alito is already looking at PA.

Bawahahahahahahhahaha

The delusions of you Trumpers...

and when it is clear how wrong you folks are, you ignore it and go on to be wrong about something else...

This lawsuit is stupid, it has no standing and you are about to find out that this is just an attempt for Paxton to get a pardon....since he is currently indicted

 

[Turtlesoup]

In new lawsuit, Texas contests election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, experts say.

www.texastribune.org

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud -- In the suit, he claims that pandemic-era changes to election procedures in those states violated federal law, and asks the U.S. Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College."

In a brilliant move, Paxton does the same thing Democrats did back when they were filing lawsuits all over the place to stop Trump from being inaugurated....so what's fair is fair right??

Nevermind the fact that the election laws in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were passed by their own state legislatures, but Texas knows better...even tho when they tried to challenge their own state's election laws, they were laughed out of court...but anything for the God-King Trump...

We will all pretend this never happened later anyways, so why not....

Actually no--Ga didn't follow its own laws-----------
And TEXAS is unique in that they tested out the dominion voter system BEFORE the ELECTION and found that DOMINION which was used in all 4 of these states was prone to FRAUD and abuse making it UNRELIABLE for election results. TEXAS can not accept the votes of these 4 states because they USED the DOMINION System which they know to be Corrupt. TEXAS can't allow their voters to be disenfranchised by the cheating in these 4 other states...especially since the 4 other states are only intent in covering up their election fraud to save face or steal the election on purpose.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

In new lawsuit, Texas contests election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, experts say.

www.texastribune.org

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the battleground states from casting "unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes" in the Electoral College. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud -- In the suit, he claims that pandemic-era changes to election procedures in those states violated federal law, and asks the U.S. Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College."

In a brilliant move, Paxton does the same thing Democrats did back when they were filing lawsuits all over the place to stop Trump from being inaugurated....so what's fair is fair right??

Nevermind the fact that the election laws in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were passed by their own state legislatures, but Texas knows better...even tho when they tried to challenge their own state's election laws, they were laughed out of court...but anything for the God-King Trump...

We will all pretend this never happened later anyways, so why not....

Actually no--Ga didn't follow its own laws-----------
And TEXAS is unique in that they tested out the dominion voter system BEFORE the ELECTION and found that DOMINION which was used in all 4 of these states was prone to FRAUD and abuse making it UNRELIABLE for election results. TEXAS can not accept the votes of these 4 states because they USED the DOMINION System which they know to be Corrupt. TEXAS can't allow their voters to be disenfranchised by the cheating in these 4 other states...especially since the 4 other states are only intent in covering up their election fraud to save face or steal the election on purpose.

Bawahahahahahahahhahahahahaha




Trumpers are having copium overdoses.....this would be embarrassing if you folks had the ability to feel shame.....

 

[martybegan]

Allowing citizens to vote by mail during a pandemic emergency is not fraud.

People calling it fraud are way off base.

Will the candidates in the primary using this method be invalidated, and special election winners be evicted, along with all the candidates in the Nov 3 election be invalidated?

After the citizens were told by their govt that it was legal and to vote that way?

I do not think so.

And if it did go to the legislature or house, wouldnt they be obligated on their electors chosen, to be the electors of the citizen's choice...who clearly did choose Biden, not Trump, but a technicality and not fraud by the citizens, is the complaint?

Why weren't the constitutionality complaints brought and settled during the primaries and before the Nov elections?

There is no way the SC would change and usurp the will of the people at this point.

Voters Constitutional rights were violated. That is the issue. All legally cast votes should be considered exactly the same regardless of jurisdiction. That did not happen.

This is a very serious Constitutional question that must be resolved to protect all of our Rights. This should not be about team politics.

No it should not.

And every candidate has a right to redress through the courts, through recounts etc.

When court after court has dismissed cases for lack of evidence...when the lead attorney himself has to claim it's not fraud in order to avoid lying to the judge, when election officials on your own team say there is no evidence of fraud, when the DoJ fails to find fraud...then it's time to move on and accept the election as valid or...

make it about team politics and attempt to overturn a legitimate election and have partisan legislatures install the candidate who lost.

That invokes a greater crisis then your fraudulent one.

Or give up and let possible fraud win the day.

I know they won't win this fight, this is just the beginning.

Court orders for all election materials in the States in question. Court orders for all election hardware and software. Court orders to produce lists of all election workers in the disputed areas.

What fraud?

There's no evidence of a 'stolen election'.

Texas is saying the States in question violated the rules. This led to the increased chance of fraud.

There is no hard evidence YET, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence you ignore. You act like the people who did it wouldn't try to hide it.

States make their own rukes and they have been upheld.

In the case Texas is trying to make they are saying the rules have to come from the legislature, as per the US Constitution.

 

[martybegan]

Allowing citizens to vote by mail during a pandemic emergency is not fraud.

People calling it fraud are way off base.

Will the candidates in the primary using this method be invalidated, and special election winners be evicted, along with all the candidates in the Nov 3 election be invalidated?

After the citizens were told by their govt that it was legal and to vote that way?

I do not think so.

And if it did go to the legislature or house, wouldnt they be obligated on their electors chosen, to be the electors of the citizen's choice...who clearly did choose Biden, not Trump, but a technicality and not fraud by the citizens, is the complaint?

Why weren't the constitutionality complaints brought and settled during the primaries and before the Nov elections?

There is no way the SC would change and usurp the will of the people at this point.

Voters Constitutional rights were violated. That is the issue. All legally cast votes should be considered exactly the same regardless of jurisdiction. That did not happen.

This is a very serious Constitutional question that must be resolved to protect all of our Rights. This should not be about team politics.

No it should not.

And every candidate has a right to redress through the courts, through recounts etc.

When court after court has dismissed cases for lack of evidence...when the lead attorney himself has to claim it's not fraud in order to avoid lying to the judge, when election officials on your own team say there is no evidence of fraud, when the DoJ fails to find fraud...then it's time to move on and accept the election as valid or...

make it about team politics and attempt to overturn a legitimate election and have partisan legislatures install the candidate who lost.

That invokes a greater crisis then your fraudulent one.

Or give up and let possible fraud win the day.

I know they won't win this fight, this is just the beginning.

Court orders for all election materials in the States in question. Court orders for all election hardware and software. Court orders to produce lists of all election workers in the disputed areas.

What fraud?

There's no evidence of a 'stolen election'.

Texas is saying the States in question violated the rules. This led to the increased chance of fraud.

There is no hard evidence YET, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence you ignore. You act like the people who did it wouldn't try to hide it.

The rules are internal to the States themselves. And the States have found no violation of their own rules.

Texas lacks standing to challenge the internal rules of another State.

The rules are supposed to come from the Legislatures as per the US Constitution, not the Executive or the Judicial.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Aren't right wing loons (generally) for state's rights? Wonder how Texarse would feel if NY decided it wanted to repeal Texarse's CCW laws?

What laws----these 4 states didn't follow their own election law and used a faulty computer fraudulent system to tabulate votes incorrectly stealing an election maybe for a very unpopular senile crook named joe.

Keep the Chinese puppet and pedophile family out of the white house.