Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
doesn't say shit about the most wins, it says 270.
better troll, but still he's just a troll now.
how come the R's never find random boxes of ballots anywhere?
in my mind they seldom do. you pointed out an instance - ONE instance
how come the R's never find random boxes of ballots anywhere?
There's actually a whole lot more fraud than that. Dims have been stuffing the ballot box for decades.There's no evidence of 'fraud.'
One cannot be hurt by that which doesn't exist.
Actually there is evidence of fraud. Every election has some fraud, even if it's just one or two voting twice, or three people being registered in the wrong place.
What is missing is evidence of enough fraud to put in question the outcome of the election. And in that they fall orders of magnitude short.
In one case the republicans were arguing about 151 ballots, where Biden held a 12,000 vote lead. Even if they succeeded, the judge pointed out, it would in no way change the outcome of the election.
You don't want to answer the question, eh?how come the R's never find random boxes of ballots anywhere?
Anakin Skywalker: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy!
Obi-Wan Kenobi: Only a Sith deals in absolutes;
You're trying to educate morons. Good luck to ya!The constitution says a majority of electors appointed.You need 270 to win, moron.And even if they take away the 62 contested electors, Biden still wins 244 to 232.
With 270 based on the expectation of there being 538, which is subject to change.
Yes they can. The legislature is the only entity that can change the law any time it wants toThe constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
The constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
No one agrees with you, turd."A candidate must receive an absolute majority of electoral votes (currently 270) to win the presidency or the vice presidency.
And if the USSC invalidates 62 of them? Then there will only be 476 appointed.
<YAWN!>The constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
All of the claims being made in the Texas law suit have been litigated at the lower court level and tossed out of court as lacking merit or evidence. This lawsuit will be tossed out too. This is simply a stunt whereby the Texas AG, who is currently under indictment in Texas, is angling for one of those pardons that Dumb Donald is giving out on his way out the door.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?They still need to request a ballot. That isn't what Michigan did.LOLOLOLThat's absentee voting, moron. You've been told about the difference over 1000 times.Are you ever not a fucking moron?Where does the state law of Michigan allow mail-in voting?Nope, nothing illegal about them.Mail-in voting, for one, asshole.Which rules were changed illegally?You aren't thinking if you think it is simple. I hope that is an exception for you, and not the norm.See page 15 for standing...."This is about Texas challenging state laws, BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE!!! FUCK EVERYTHING THAT HAS TOLD ME REPEATEDLY THAT THIS IS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THAT THING!!!"
No, it's because they don't have standing, dumbass.
It's like CA suing TX for allowing fracking.
God you guys are stupid.
"The constitutional failures of Defendant States injure Plaintiff States because [the right of suffrage is denied]."
The right to suffrage isn't denied. The folks in Texas got to vote.
The idea that you've lost your right to sufferage if your candidate loses is silly.
If states illegally change their voting rules, such that the election outcome is changed, all of the people in other states who voted for other candidates have effectively had their votes nullified, illegally.
It's somewhat analogous to water rights of states that share the same river. If an upstream state builds a dam, the other states still have access to the river basin, but when they turn on their taps, they don't get as much water as before.
And the proper forum for recourse is the Supreme Court.
It's my opinion that the Dems in some states used the plandemic to illegally steal the election, in violation of their, and the US Constitutions. It's similar to stealing the river water that adjacent states share.
Virginia also changed its voting regulations this year, rather dramatically, but they did it through the legislature, consistent with the Constitution.
Regards,
Jim
Ever???
Section 168.759
Fucking moron, Michigan changed that law in December, 2018, removing the requirement that an excuse is needed to vote absentee. Now any Michigan resident registered voter can vote absentee with no excuse.
So you just lied again.
www.michigan.gov
Yes they can. The legislature is the only entity that can change the law any time it wants toThe constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
<YAWN!>The constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
All of the claims being made in the Texas law suit have been litigated at the lower court level and tossed out of court as lacking merit or evidence. This lawsuit will be tossed out too. This is simply a stunt whereby the Texas AG, who is currently under indictment in Texas, is angling for one of those pardons that Dumb Donald is giving out on his way out the door.
www.newsmax.com
All of the claims being made in the Texas law suit have been litigated at the lower court level and tossed out of court as lacking merit or evidence. This lawsuit will be tossed out too. This is simply a stunt whereby the Texas AG, who is currently under indictment in Texas, is angling for one of those pardons that Dumb Donald is giving out on his way out the door.
The constitution gives legislatures the power to choose the manner in which electors are chosen.... by the legislature voting themselves, or by the vote of the citizens, or by flipping a coin etc.
These legislatures chose to give up the legislature picking the electors, and gave it to the citizens to choose.
And having selected the method of choosing the electors, the legislature can't change the law in the middle of the election. And they certainly can't change the law ex-post facto.
The method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
All of the claims being made in the Texas law suit have been litigated at the lower court level and tossed out of court as lacking merit or evidence. This lawsuit will be tossed out too. This is simply a stunt whereby the Texas AG, who is currently under indictment in Texas, is angling for one of those pardons that Dumb Donald is giving out on his way out the door.
Yes they can. The legislature is the only entity that can change the law any time it wants toThe method, whether the EC is chosen by the legislature, the voters, or by flipping a coin must remain in place.
gee - and to think up until a few minutes ago i gave you credit for not being a troll.how come the R's never find random boxes of ballots anywhere?
Anakin Skywalker: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy!
Obi-Wan Kenobi: Only a Sith deals in absolutes;
