Texas Hairdresser Set Free!!

[Rigby5]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He went too far because he was angry....we don't need judges like that....they are supposed to keep a cool head and not imprison because he is mad....

Wasn’t the judge following the law as he should?
She violated the stay-at-home order by reopening her business, against Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s original COVID-19 executive orders.
.

WRONG!

Governors are the executive and can NOT make law that is only for the legislative.
A governor can declare martial law and make decrees, but only if the legislature is unable to meet in a timely fashion.
It is totally and completely illegal for a governor to declare that shops can not open.
That is a total violation of the separation of powers, the 4th and 5th amendments, etc.
Executive orders are only legal when they detail the implementation of a statute passed by the legislature.
There is no such legislation authorizing these actions by the governor.
A stay at home order is completely illegal because obviously people have to do things in order to survive, and survival is supreme. No governor can ever arbitrarily over ride what one has to do in order to survive.

Nor does a "stay at home" order make any sense.
Flattening the curve does not reduce the area under the curve, so results in more deaths, not fewer.
The least deaths come from obtaining herd immunity as quickly as possible, because then the virus is totally eradicated. And while a vaccine is the best way to get herd immunity, the quicker alternative is if 55% of the young/healthy population volunteers for deliberate infection of the first strain of COVID, that was not lethal. The death toll would only have been a few thousand, and it would have been over in March.

 

[percysunshine]

Texas judges, at this level, are elected.

Up for re-election in 2022.

 

[Rigby5]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He sentenced her to 7 DAYS WITHOUT BAIL for doing nothing more than refusing to apologize yet they are letting out violent criminals with low or no bail yet this woman was held without bail for opening her business.

You still say whats the big deal?

Loony-leftards have a talent for twisting themselves into pretzels just to maintain their 'progressive" narrative, stupid as it is.

Now, now, I am more an extreme leftest than anyone you ever ran into, and I am totally against the lock down, dictatorial governors, or judges who do not know what law really is.
Clearly it was a total violation of the individual rights of the hair dresser, to arrest her at all.

 

[Likkmee]

Think about it...he tosses her into jail with covid positive inmates through the front door while the city is releasing criminals out the back door...it was wrong...he has no business sitting on the bench....

The word for bench is "banco". Bank. Get it ?

 

[SAYIT]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He sentenced her to 7 DAYS WITHOUT BAIL for doing nothing more than refusing to apologize yet they are letting out violent criminals with low or no bail yet this woman was held without bail for opening her business.

You still say whats the big deal?

Loony-leftards have a talent for twisting themselves into pretzels just to maintain their 'progressive" narrative, stupid as it is.

Now, now, I am more an extreme leftest than anyone you ever ran into, and I am totally against the lock down, dictatorial governors, or judges who do not know what law really is.
Clearly it was a total violation of the individual rights of the hair dresser, to arrest her at all.

That would make you one-in-a-million but pretty much every time some "extreme leftest" says he gets it and is "totally against dictatorial governors, or judges who do not know what law really is" he quickly returns to the plantation lest he lose his loony-left membership privileges and decoder ring.

Just sayin'.

 

[PK1]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He went too far because he was angry....we don't need judges like that....they are supposed to keep a cool head and not imprison because he is mad....

Wasn’t the judge following the law as he should?
She violated the stay-at-home order by reopening her business, against Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s original COVID-19 executive orders.
.

Wrong.

He SPECIFICALLY sent her to jail because she refused to apologize and admit she was selfish. Had she groveled at his feet she would have been sent home.

I’m not arguing that the judge could have sent her Free, but he had The LAW behind him and was looking for some remorse from the guilty defendent, which is common in courts of law.
That woman is lucky she was not black and resisting arrest by a racist white cop in a Southern state!
.

 

[Rigby5]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He sentenced her to 7 DAYS WITHOUT BAIL for doing nothing more than refusing to apologize yet they are letting out violent criminals with low or no bail yet this woman was held without bail for opening her business.

You still say whats the big deal?

Loony-leftards have a talent for twisting themselves into pretzels just to maintain their 'progressive" narrative, stupid as it is.

Now, now, I am more an extreme leftest than anyone you ever ran into, and I am totally against the lock down, dictatorial governors, or judges who do not know what law really is.
Clearly it was a total violation of the individual rights of the hair dresser, to arrest her at all.

That would make you one-in-a-million but pretty much every time some "extreme leftest" says he gets it and is "totally against dictatorial governors, or judges who do not know what law really is" he quickly returns to the plantation lest he lose his loony-left membership privileges and decoder ring.

Just sayin'.

Nope, I'm a card carrying socialist who voted for Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders, and I think Obama goofed with mandatory health insurance, and following Hillary's advice on staying in the foolish Mideast conflict.
Gun control by the feds and the War on Drugs are totally illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

The judge should be recalled....

What’s the big deal?
She was released after 2 days “time served”, which was a good lesson for her.
Are you angry at the governor too?

For the record, I agree that she should not have done that.
.

He went too far because he was angry....we don't need judges like that....they are supposed to keep a cool head and not imprison because he is mad....

Wasn’t the judge following the law as he should?
She violated the stay-at-home order by reopening her business, against Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s original COVID-19 executive orders.
.

Wrong.

He SPECIFICALLY sent her to jail because she refused to apologize and admit she was selfish. Had she groveled at his feet she would have been sent home.

I’m not arguing that the judge could have sent her Free, but he had The LAW behind him and was looking for some remorse from the guilty defendent, which is common in courts of law.
That woman is lucky she was not black and resisting arrest by a racist white cop in a Southern state!
.

NO! He did not have the law behind him.
There are very limited circumstances when a governor can ignore the law and proclaim edicts that violate rights, like a "stay at home" order.
And this was not one of them.
The only times a governor can make these extra legal decrees is if something happens like an invasion and the legislature can not meet.
That was not the case.
It was essentially a declaration of martial law without any justification and the governor should be immediately impeached.
Any judge should know that.
Executive orders are NOT law or legislation.