Texas Senate approves bills requiring 10 Commandments in K-12 classrooms, Bible time in school

[Skylar]

Liberty is when the moonbats forced God and the Ten Commandments out of the public schools.

They understand what liberty means. Deny certain subject matters. Force ignorance.

Forcing your religion on kids isn't 'liberty'. Its literally the opposite.

And if the only way to sustain your faith is FORCING children to be exposed to it......maybe you need a better faith.

 

[norwegen]

When moonbat teachers teach on past cultures, do they eliminate the religions of those cultures from the curriculum?

Certainly they do if it was a Christian culture.

 

[norwegen]

Forcing your religion on kids isn't 'liberty'. Its literally the opposite.

Withholding material from kids isn't liberty. It's literally the opposite.

 

[Skylar]

Denying material from kids isn't liberty. It's literally the opposite.

You're forcing this on kids. Liberty isn't forcing a child to consume your religion.

That Texans feel that the NEED to force children to be exposed to their religion under penalty of law......demonstrates how they have no faith in their religion's capacity to persuade without force.

But then, White Christian Nationalism is a hell of a drug.

 

[norwegen]

You're forcing this on kids. Liberty isn't forcing a child to consume your religion.

You're withholding this from kids. Liberty isn't withholding from a child elements of America's history.

 

[Skylar]

You're withholding this from kids. Liberty isn't withholding from a child elements of America's history.

You can take your Texan children to your church if you want to.

But forcing OTHER people's kids to consume your religion under penalty of law isn't liberty.

Its generic White Christian Nationalism.

 

[norwegen]

You can take your Texan children to your church if you want to.

But forcing OTHER people's kids to consume your religion under penalty of law isn't liberty.

Its generic White Christian Nationalism.

You didn't read the OP, did ya.

The bill is not about consuming any religion.

It's just like you moonbats to insert your own assumptions.

 

[Skylar]

You didn't read the OP, did ya.

The bill is not about consuming any religion.

It's just like you moonbats to insert your own assumptions.

The bill is about forcing the 10 commandments into EVERY public school classroom. Forcing children to be exposed to your faith, regardless of what they or their parents want.

Forcing children to consume your religion under penalty of law isn't 'liberty'.

 

[bodecea]

Lib loons are unhappy victim people and resent greatly those who find solace and good direction in religion

You mean we resent those who find solace in FORCING their religion on others.

 

[badger2]

Think about the time, how could the founding fathers have possibly avoided religious influences? In fact, even today we are so steeped in our Christian heritage I do not think we could avoid its influences today. Heck, it is hard to explain why adultery is wrong without some religious upbringing. I do see how the relationship between some Christian denominations and capitalism has tainted both their religion and politics.

You take MI6 bait. You take British bait. Yes, American founders avoided religious influence for damn good reasons. god's law is unchangeable, thus more stupid. American law is changeable, thus more intelligent. This preposition got screwed: from.

It's not intelligent to establish a nation based on contradictions as found in the bible. Your problem seems to now be doubled: not having read RFK Jr., who is running for president, and not having read Seidel, an author you will not be debating without getting roughed up here at USMB. You're on the correct thread. Your problem is education.

Jefferson's wall. Was it only Jefferson's? The influence of protection rackets that confiscate concepts such as adultery and use it for themselves, politicize it, can be avoided in America. In Islamic (capitalized adjective) countries, not so easily. It takes stones to be an atheist in America, let alone the clitorectomy-inducing violence of islamic countries.

Your automatonism repeats the mantras of fear forged by British protection rackets that were copulating with the State.

'Colonial governments were often overtly and officially religious. This is hardly surprising. Every colony was part of the British Empire, subject to the Christian king who headed the Anglican Church. Every colony had an established church, and English common law made heresy - a crime interpreted and defined by ecclesiastical judges - a capital crime, punished by burning in some colonies.
....
The Texas School Board altered its curriculum in 2014 to include Moses in American history because of his supposed influence on the Constitution. The Ten Commandments appear, often illegally, in government buildings, schools and courthouses around the country. They appear at the Texas Capitol in Austin and on the robes of a judge in Alabama. They dot government property courtesy of Cecil B. DeMille, who promoted his movie with granite monuments and some help from the Fraternal Order of Eagles.

When Bloomfield, New mexico, lost a court battle over a Ten Commandments monument displayed in front of City Hall, Mayor Scott Eckstein was "surprised (by the decision) and had never really considered the judge ruling against it because it's a historical document just like the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights"

The city's reliance on bad history cost the taxpayers $700,000. The commandments are ubiquitous not just because of Hollywood promoters, but because they are argued to be the basis of American law and morality.'
(Seidel, op cit. pp. 91-2 & 169-70)

As with xian protection-racketism confiscating morality, Oz never gave something to the Tin Man that he did not already have.

 

[norwegen]

The bill is about forcing the 10 commandments into EVERY public school classroom. Forcing children to be exposed to your faith, regardless of what they or their parents want.

Forcing children to consume your religion under penalty of law isn't 'liberty'.

No it isn't, Retard. Nobody is forcing Judaism on anybody. Nobody is forcing the consumption of an ancient temple religion. All the bill does is remind students of the impact the Bible has had on America's heritage.

Damn, you're a snowflake. Aaahhh! The Ten Commandments! My eyes! My eyes! They're burning!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They can't make any law banning Christianity from anywhere. Not that laws mean anything to you perverts and gimps, but the Bill of Rights is very clear on that.

No, it does not. It says the government cannot force a religion upon you.

 

[WEATHER53]

Love how you lib loons use the fake word “force” as if its troublesome or painful.
What does actually pain you is they may make a personal choice to embrace it and you don’t want them to have that option nor opportunity.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yep. Textbooks common to all primary schools included the Bible, the New England Primer, and the McGuffey Readers, which imparted to students a knowledge of Presbyterian Calvinistic beliefs and manners well into the middle of the nineteenth century.

150 years ago.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If retarded technicalities help you self manipulate and make you feel better go with that Tard…To sane people 9 in 10 is basically “all”.

Leftist Fools:
“Black people don’t have a greater propensity for criminality…I know this because I know two of them that are totally legit and law abiding.”

Once again you prove your stupidity.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Horseshit. Your usual lack of education is as always displayed.

I think it is your lack of education is showing.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No it doesn't.

Yes, it does because it implies an endorsement of the Jewish and Christian religions.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No, its not. We have no laws requiring anyone to bow down to a certain religion. Muslims wear head scarfs at school, ten commandments on the wall, etc. Thats not establishing a religion.

Wearing head scarves is a religion? Did you know the Catholic church required women to cover their hair in church not so long ago?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So, refuse to teach America's Judeo-Christian heritage. Are you an American?

You cannot teach a heritage because not everyone shares that heritage.

 

[MagicMike]

Yeah. We already know who your master is.

But keep it up with the redundancy, if that's what makes you rubes happy.

Thanks for the thought provoking post.



.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.