🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Texas Valedictorian Secretly Switches Speech To Rail Against "Dehumanizing" Abortion Law

Oh...it's pretty accurate.

Once they are born that's it.

Mother has no health insurance, will you help with her maternal medical costs? Sorry, that's HER problem.

She's a single mother, trying to get a job and afford childcare, can you help with childcare? No. That's Her problem. No family friendly policies from you.

WIC? CHIP? - you're right in there for cutting it.

Subsidized housing? Nope. She's on her own.

She had to drop out of school and needs help with her education? Too bad.
I think not. Would you abandon a homeless child on the street if it meant finding a home and
providing care and medical aid? Your tiresome arguments are bullshit.
You just don't want to NOT be able to terminate lives anymore. Admit it.
 
A Texas high school valedictorian secretly replaced her graduation speech to call attention to a recent anti-abortion law signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott (R). The speech she submitted to Lake Highlands High School ahead of Saturday's commencement ceremony focused on media consumptionhers

But on the day of the ceremony Smith instead read from another set of prepared remarks that she had hidden in her bra. Smith told the audience that she was afraid that the so-called "heartbeat bill" could impact her future.



This is why there is hope for America's future.


Because you've taught the children it's ok to lie if they feel like it?

Because of intelligent young people like that valedictorian, who are rejecting religious zealots, and will be future leaders that will overturn the ignorance that is religious and social conservatism.

We hope. But the issue is that people with good reasons find it harder to convince people than those who are entertaining and charismatic with their petty nationalism.

"petty nationalism"?

What a load of shit.
 
It depends where on the zero to nine month scale they sit.
Doesn't matter at all....There are millions of atheists and agnostics who are pro-life.

The OP is, as usual, a full-of-shit bigot.
This issue isn't black and white. there are 3rd trimester right to livers, 2nd trimester right to livers, 1st trimester right to lifers, and from conception right to lifers.
I was 1st tri pro choice until the moment I saw the ghoulish videos, of pieces of human trash cavalierly talking about parting out aborted fetuses like junked Buicks.

Fuck abortionists....They're anti-human fiends.
So just like that - you changed your mind and refuse women the right to end her pregnancy from the moment of conception.
Yes, just like that.

The roaring silence and shrug of the shoulders from ghoulish misanthropes like you irreversibly burnished that shift in thinking.
The real misanthropes....

View attachment 496578
That's a tiresome lie perpetuated by people that don't give a damn about children themselves,
obviously. So ironic. You don't win arguments by lying about the other side.

You win by presenting a better argument. The American public has for years rejected the "right"
to murder infants.
Oh...it's pretty accurate.

Once they are born that's it.

Mother has no health insurance, will you help with her maternal medical costs? Sorry, that's HER problem.

She's a single mother, trying to get a job and afford childcare, can you help with childcare? No. That's Her problem. No family friendly policies from you.

WIC? CHIP? - you're right in there for cutting it.

Subsidized housing? Nope. She's on her own.

She had to drop out of school and needs help with her education? Too bad.
None of these are problems at all. Couples looking to adopt will cover all maternal medical costs. Once the single mother adopts the baby out she no longer needs child care or WIC or CHIP. She can go right back to school until she gets knocked up again.

What you want is for the government to step in as the husband and father.
All of the freebie trappings of their beloved socialist welfare state thrown at single mothers, and still it's not enough...Only infanticide-on-demand will be acceptable.

Eventually, the abortionist ghouls always end up painting themselves into a corner.
 
All of the freebie trappings of their beloved socialist welfare state thrown at single mothers, and still it's not enough...Only infanticide-on-demand will be acceptable.

Eventually, the abortionist ghouls always end up painting themselves into a corner.
We live in a vast welfare state. Yet members of child death cults think single mothers will somehow
wind up starving and homeless?

Don't want to end up destitute? Give your child up for adoption.
 
I support every woman's "right" to kill her worthless idiot spawn and spare the rest of humanity. In fact, for fucking idiots, it should be MANDATORY!!!
 
Some women have babies as a career choice. The more they have the more money they get. Then they get WIC, CHIP, EBT, welfare, Housing, reduced utility billls, several obamaphones, they don't have many minutes and you need more than one. Schools feed the kids, sometimes three meals a day. All mama needs is to give them a few snacks. They get free school supplies.

The really savvy women claim that one or more of their children is "disabled". Usually some form of autism. The SSI checks start rolling in. TWO welfare mothers can really work the system. They "work" for one another providing child care. Sally gets state money for providing care to Susie's two children. Meanwhile, Susie gets state money for providing child care for Sally's children.

All in all a hardworking welfare bitch can get as much as $5,000 a month. No wonder the welfare bitches can afford to get their nails done every week.
 
If you're dumb enough to get pregnant today then maybe you need some education.
Hey if you're dumb enough to get COVID-19, then maybe you need some education from the CDC.
There you go again. Using the words education and CDC in the same sentence. You people never seem to catch on. And by the way, that was a pretty shitty analogy.
 
It depends where on the zero to nine month scale they sit.
Doesn't matter at all....There are millions of atheists and agnostics who are pro-life.

The OP is, as usual, a full-of-shit bigot.
This issue isn't black and white. there are 3rd trimester right to livers, 2nd trimester right to livers, 1st trimester right to lifers, and from conception right to lifers.
I was 1st tri pro choice until the moment I saw the ghoulish videos, of pieces of human trash cavalierly talking about parting out aborted fetuses like junked Buicks.

Fuck abortionists....They're anti-human fiends.
So just like that - you changed your mind and refuse women the right to end her pregnancy from the moment of conception.
Yes, just like that.

The roaring silence and shrug of the shoulders from ghoulish misanthropes like you irreversibly burnished that shift in thinking.
The real misanthropes....

View attachment 496578
That's a tiresome lie perpetuated by people that don't give a damn about children themselves,
obviously. So ironic. You don't win arguments by lying about the other side.

You win by presenting a better argument. The American public has for years rejected the "right"
to murder infants.

cg5271036c46780.jpg
 
Oh...it's pretty accurate.

Once they are born that's it.

Mother has no health insurance, will you help with her maternal medical costs? Sorry, that's HER problem.

She's a single mother, trying to get a job and afford childcare, can you help with childcare? No. That's Her problem. No family friendly policies from you.

WIC? CHIP? - you're right in there for cutting it.

Subsidized housing? Nope. She's on her own.

She had to drop out of school and needs help with her education? Too bad.
My daughter and her husband tried to adopt for several years and I know for a fact the pool of
adoptable children is small and very costly.

Instead of throwing babies away in an abortionists' trash can or selling their organs off
to ghoulish profiteers how about taking the money we give away to PP and invest it in
a government run adoption service?

It may not satisfy you like promoting abortions but matching up prospective parents with
rescued children would kill two birds with one stone, instead of killing one child with
forceps and a suction tube.

i say use the stem cells where research has been proven to be quite valuable in possibly helping to find cures for debilitating diseases that some post born children & adults ( already with life histories ) suffer from.
 
Whom among us wouldn't be proud to call her their daughter?




Bravo!

There are many here among us who wouldn't want her for their daughter.

There Is another thread on this. In that thread the trump people call her a pregnant bitch. Call her names. Trash her.

Simply for speaking her mind freely.

Simply for trying to protect hers and millions of other young women and girls lives.

So yes there are already many on this board who have already trashed her and obviously don't want her as their daughter.
 
Whom among us wouldn't be proud to call her their daughter?

I don't know about that but agree that 6 weeks is a bit stiff. Personally, I've always considered the cut off for abortion to be around the 26th week. At that point I feel we have undeniably gone from a fetus to a human child capable of thought, perception and feelings, and the preemies born premature would seem to fairly agree with that opinion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top