Texas vs Gay Sex Marriage. Are Behaviors The Same As Race?

Will this boil down to the difference between actions/verb (gay sex) vs noun (race)

  • Yes, since gay sex is a verb, it isn't the same as static race. Christians cannot participate.

  • No, it doesn't matter whether gay sex is a noun or verb, it's a right!

  • Maybe. This is going to be a very dissecting Hearing this time and not just generalizations.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Whether gay people are born that way or not is irrelevant. Civil rights under the Constitution of the United States of America have no meaningful connection to genetics.


It's very relevant. If homosexuality is a behavior instead of a genetic issue such as race or sex, it has no business being lumped in with constitutional protections of race and gender. Period.

If homosexuality is a behavior- then it is a behavior- just like religion is behavior.

Rights in the Constitution are not based upon genetics.

Every thought that might be the reason religion is protected under a separate amendment?


The framers of the Constitution were smarter than people think they are. The First Amendment both protects and disallows religion.

Oh the Founders were in possession of intellects beyond anything present today...

Of course, few people on this board could pass an 8th grade Civics Test from 1895. So... well... you know.

But the 1st amendment in no way disallows religion.

What the First Amendment does it to preclude the Federal Government from establishing a law that in any way effects the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion.

Which the SCOTUS just did, in SPADES.


No laws that any way effect the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion? I'm pretty sure the Mormon polygamists and the Rastafarians could probably point out a couple examples of how you are wrong. American Indians are limited in the way they celebrate their sacraments as well.
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
 
It's very relevant. If homosexuality is a behavior instead of a genetic issue such as race or sex, it has no business being lumped in with constitutional protections of race and gender. Period.

If homosexuality is a behavior- then it is a behavior- just like religion is behavior.

Rights in the Constitution are not based upon genetics.

Every thought that might be the reason religion is protected under a separate amendment?


The framers of the Constitution were smarter than people think they are. The First Amendment both protects and disallows religion.

Oh the Founders were in possession of intellects beyond anything present today...

Of course, few people on this board could pass an 8th grade Civics Test from 1895. So... well... you know.

But the 1st amendment in no way disallows religion.

What the First Amendment does it to preclude the Federal Government from establishing a law that in any way effects the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion.

Which the SCOTUS just did, in SPADES.


No laws that any way effect the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion? I'm pretty sure the Mormon polygamists and the Rastafarians could probably point out a couple examples of how you are wrong. American Indians are limited in the way they celebrate their sacraments as well.

What about Muslims? Why did you leave them out of your far left rant?
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!


Perhaps your diseased mind believes that, but it isn't true. Like most of the imagined things the right wing claimed would happen, that one just didn't happen.
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!


Perhaps your diseased mind believes that, but it isn't true. Like most of the imagined things the right wing claimed would happen, that one just didn't happen.

Tell that to woody Allen, you far left drone..
 
If homosexuality is a behavior- then it is a behavior- just like religion is behavior.

Rights in the Constitution are not based upon genetics.

Every thought that might be the reason religion is protected under a separate amendment?


The framers of the Constitution were smarter than people think they are. The First Amendment both protects and disallows religion.

Oh the Founders were in possession of intellects beyond anything present today...

Of course, few people on this board could pass an 8th grade Civics Test from 1895. So... well... you know.

But the 1st amendment in no way disallows religion.

What the First Amendment does it to preclude the Federal Government from establishing a law that in any way effects the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion.

Which the SCOTUS just did, in SPADES.


No laws that any way effect the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion? I'm pretty sure the Mormon polygamists and the Rastafarians could probably point out a couple examples of how you are wrong. American Indians are limited in the way they celebrate their sacraments as well.

What about Muslims? Why did you leave them out of your far left rant?


I'm not aware of any limits to a Muslim's ability to practice any main stream religious sacraments. I get that you are trying to tie the actions of some terrorists to Mainstream Islam, but that makes no more sense than trying to claim stoning is a Christian sacrament,
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.
 
Every thought that might be the reason religion is protected under a separate amendment?


The framers of the Constitution were smarter than people think they are. The First Amendment both protects and disallows religion.

Oh the Founders were in possession of intellects beyond anything present today...

Of course, few people on this board could pass an 8th grade Civics Test from 1895. So... well... you know.

But the 1st amendment in no way disallows religion.

What the First Amendment does it to preclude the Federal Government from establishing a law that in any way effects the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion.

Which the SCOTUS just did, in SPADES.


No laws that any way effect the means of the individual to freely exercise their religion? I'm pretty sure the Mormon polygamists and the Rastafarians could probably point out a couple examples of how you are wrong. American Indians are limited in the way they celebrate their sacraments as well.

What about Muslims? Why did you leave them out of your far left rant?


I'm not aware of any limits to a Muslim's ability to practice any main stream religious sacraments. I get that you are trying to tie the actions of some terrorists to Mainstream Islam, but that makes no more sense than trying to claim stoning is a Christian sacrament,

And this proves why the far left religion is the most dangerous on the planet.
 
Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma not connected to reality..
 
Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma not connected to reality..

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

It happens so often- I wonder why it is that homophobes can't tell the difference?
 
I am so tired of this bullshit behavior vs. race argument. Seriously. It is retarded.

The bigots use the exact same idiotic and fallacious arguments against equality for gays as they did against equality for blacks. ....

ROFLMNAO...

So you're sick of the argument which you're standing upon?

No one opposed equality for sexual deviants... We merely noted the definitional standard of marriage as establushes by nature... Which in no way precluded degenerates from marriage, except where they applied to marry outside of the definitional standard of marriage.

To equate that with Black people is an insult TO BLACK PEOPLE... But it is a wonderful demonstration of the racism inherent in Left-think.

Nature does not define marriage. Your claim is clearly regarding sex.
 
In the eyes of the (secular) law, your religious arguements mean no more than those from a Satanist would.

F*** your religion. (self-censored, trying to cuss less.)

Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!


Perhaps your diseased mind believes that, but it isn't true. Like most of the imagined things the right wing claimed would happen, that one just didn't happen.

Tell that to woody Allen, you far left drone..


Make up your confused mind. You just said pedophilia didn't exist any more because of gay marriage, and now you mention Woody Allen. You are a little too confused right now to try arguing about anything. Go take your medication and cool your brain, and come back and try again later.
 
No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma not connected to reality..

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

It happens so often- I wonder why it is that homophobes can't tell the difference?

Yes the far left drones and their labeling system, makes one wonder if anyone can trust their comments and labels other than the far left religious cult.
 
Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma not connected to reality..


I'm serious Kosh. If you don't calm down, Your attendant might not let you have your pudding this afternoon. You know that's what happened the last time you got all worked up.
 
Sounds like someone is grumpy this may limit his access to adoptable orphans using being "legally married" as a shoehorn...

Are you implying pedophilia?

No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!


Perhaps your diseased mind believes that, but it isn't true. Like most of the imagined things the right wing claimed would happen, that one just didn't happen.

Tell that to woody Allen, you far left drone..


Make up your confused mind. You just said pedophilia didn't exist any more because of gay marriage, and now you mention Woody Allen. You are a little too confused right now to try arguing about anything. Go take your medication and cool your brain, and come back and try again later.

Wrong! Once again the far left drones will spin it however they need to fit their perverse narrative.

They also continue to show that they are irony impaired..

And "marriage" is a right as least that is what you far left drones have been spouting..

So is "marriage" a right or not?
 
No such thing anymore since "marriage" is a right!!

Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma.
Another homophobe who cannot differentiate between child molestation and adults getting married.

Another far left drone running a narrative based on the debunked far left religious dogma not connected to reality..


I'm serious Kosh. If you don't calm down, Your attendant might not let you have your pudding this afternoon. You know that's what happened the last time you got all worked up.

See how the far left just run their narratives without question or hesitation.

So is "Marriage" a "right" or not?
 

Forum List

Back
Top