Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

Jan. 6 Panel Members Say New Witnesses Have Come Forward After Hutchinson’s Testimony

The two Republican members of the Jan. 6 Select Committee, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and committee vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), on Sunday said that new witnesses have come forward wanting to testify before the panel after explosive testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, former aide to Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, last week.

In her testimony, Hutchinson offered a firsthand account of then-President Trump and his allies’ behavior in the days leading up to and on Jan. 6. Among the stunning revelations during Hutchinson’s testimony, the ex-Meadows aide testified about how Meadows and others in Trump’s circle anticipated violence prior to Jan. 6 and the ways in which Trump encouraged it privately. Additionally, Hutchinson recalled Trump demanding the Secret Service get rid of metal detectors at the pre-insurrection rally on the Ellipse so that his armed supporters could move closer to the stage, making the crowd appear larger.

On CNN, Kinzinger said that new witnesses have expressed their desire to testify before the panel since Hutchinson’s testimony aired.

After declining to go into details about the new witnesses, Kinzinger praised Hutchinson for “inspiring” more people to come forward.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/...ger-cheney-hutchinson-testimony-new-witnesses

As Chairman Thompson suggested, perhaps Cassidy's testimony has jogged the memory of reluctant witnesses.
 
D’oh…:eusa_doh:
Because it’s a crime maybe?


“Federal crime

It is a federal crime to make a material false statement in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency or department. 1 Perjury is also a federal crime. Perjury is a false statement made under oath before a federal tribunal or official.”
It's a crime only if committed before official legal bodies. That rules out the Jan 6 show trial
 
Jan. 6 Panel Members Say New Witnesses Have Come Forward After Hutchinson’s Testimony

The two Republican members of the Jan. 6 Select Committee, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and committee vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), on Sunday said that new witnesses have come forward wanting to testify before the panel after explosive testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, former aide to Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, last week.

In her testimony, Hutchinson offered a firsthand account of then-President Trump and his allies’ behavior in the days leading up to and on Jan. 6. Among the stunning revelations during Hutchinson’s testimony, the ex-Meadows aide testified about how Meadows and others in Trump’s circle anticipated violence prior to Jan. 6 and the ways in which Trump encouraged it privately. Additionally, Hutchinson recalled Trump demanding the Secret Service get rid of metal detectors at the pre-insurrection rally on the Ellipse so that his armed supporters could move closer to the stage, making the crowd appear larger.

On CNN, Kinzinger said that new witnesses have expressed their desire to testify before the panel since Hutchinson’s testimony aired.

After declining to go into details about the new witnesses, Kinzinger praised Hutchinson for “inspiring” more people to come forward.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/...ger-cheney-hutchinson-testimony-new-witnesses

As Chairman Thompson suggested, perhaps Cassidy's testimony has jogged the memory of reluctant witnesses.
Of course, Hutchinson is a proven liar.

You prog tards are so desperate to get Trump that it's sad to watch.
 
Congress members are federal officials, dope.

Federal officials have no authority to charge you with a crime except as a result of being part of an official legitimate congressional proceeding. The Jan 6 committee is not legitimate. There are no members on it that were selected by the opposition party. No one has any legal obligation to tell the truth to a kangaroo court.
 
Last edited:
It wouldn't have been much of a fight. Had he not resigned, he would have been impeached by the House and thrown out of office by the Senate.

no one knows that for a fact. I DO know that hilliary was fired from her position. junior member house judiciary committee because the head of the committee was astounded at her lack of ethics.
 
Federal officials have no authority to charge you with a crime except as a result of being part of an official legitimate congressional proceeding. The Jan 6 committee is not legitimate. There are no members on it that were selected by the opposition party. No one has any legal obligation to tell the truth to a kangaroo court.

:cuckoo:
 
no one knows that for a fact. I DO know that hilliary was fired from her position. junior member house judiciary committee because the head of the committee was astounded at her lack of ethics.

Then you don't know shit because Hillary wasn't fired. The impeachment inquiry team she was on was disbanded as they were no longer needed since Nixon resigned.

And Nixon wouldn't have resigned if he wasn't going to lose. His sources knew what the count would be and it wasn't that he would prevail. In committee, with enough Republicans voting to impeach, 71% of the members of that committee voted to impeach. He would have been impeached easily and there's no reason to think the Senate would have been much different. Not to mention, his resignation was a tacit admission of guilt as he couldn't have been pardoned had he been impeached.
 
A pity you can't prove she lied about anything she said.
It doesn't matter if she did or she didn't. Her testimony was all hearsay, bullshit in other words. You're harping on the issue of her honesty is one of your typical diversions.
 
Last edited:
Where did Trump lung at the driver, in the Beast or somewhere else?

Doesn't matter as she didn't testify that he actually did that. She testified she was told he did that.

What a shame you don't understand English, fucking moron.
 
It doesn't matter if the did or she didn't. Her testimony was all hearsay, bullshit in other words. You're harping on the issue of her honesty is one of your typical diversions.

Which is why I don't care that she claims she was told Trump lunged at the steering wheel. The bombshell she dropped was that Trump knew that crowd was armed and summoned them to the Capitol because they weren't there to harm him. And that was based on first hand evidence, not hearsay.
 
Which is why I don't care that she claims she was told Trump lunged at the steering wheel. The bombshell she dropped was that Trump knew that crowd was armed and summoned them to the Capitol because they weren't there to harm him. And that was based on first hand evidence, not hearsay.
There is no way Trump could have known that, asshole. Someone told him that is not synonymous with him knowing it. No one knew it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top