Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

[Hutch Starskey]

It's almost as if they intend to complain about everything he does, even if he does the exact opposite of what they were complaining about the first time.

The work you dopes have to put in to trying to stay ahead of this must be exhausting. At what point does he cease to be worth it? When do you just say enough and move on ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So you don't want an authoritarian, hyper-nationalist strongman in power, who rules by intimidation and force, using government to pick and choose the winners. Who creates a cult of personality by demanding the unswerving loyalty of anyone who comes in contact with him. Who creates distrust in the system and who will attack and try to discredit and destroy anyone who criticizes him.

Good.

Oh my. That sounds like Stalin.
Of course we don’t want that.

 

[scruffy]

Jebus Crisco!

This is NOT a legal proceeding. This is simply a hearing to inform the public of the who, what, where, when, why and how January 6th riot and that obstruction of the official counting of electors, came about, and what did the president know, and when did he know it, type stuff.

If the DOJ investigates for legal purposes, they won't use hearsay.

What a load of crap. ^^^

Putting liars on the stand is NOT informing the public

Withholding evidence is NOT informing the public.

This is NOT an investigation. It's a smear parade. A monkey trial for sound bites. The fucktards even hired a Hollywood producer.

Grow a brain cell, will you?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

@Fort Fun Indianav

What a load of crap. ^^^

Putting liars on the stand is NOT informing the public

Withholding evidence is NOT informing the public.

This is NOT an investigation. It's a smear parade. A monkey trial for sound bites. The fucktards even hired a Hollywood producer.

Grow a brain cell, will you?

IKR?
Republicans even pulled all their people out so morons like yourself could bitch about how unfair it is.

 

[eagle1462010]

Jebus Crisco!

This is NOT a legal proceeding. This is simply a hearing to inform the public of the who, what, where, when, why and how January 6th riot and that obstruction of the official counting of electors, came about, and what did the president know, and when did he know it, type stuff.

If the DOJ investigates for legal purposes, they won't use hearsay.

Its a clown show trying to find a crime including jay walking on Trump

 

[Care4all]

Its a clown show trying to find a crime including jay walking on Trump

Pay attention! The crimes committed by the Trump team have always been evident to anyone with the ability to see with clear eyes, what is going on, around them.

This is just filling in some gaps and putting faces, on those involved!


And maybe it's a wake up jolt, to some on your aisle that have been stuck in their right wing media prism.

 

[berg80]

It’s possible the Jan. 6 committee refers a criminal case against Trump, Liz Cheney says

It’s still possible that the Jan. 6 committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol makes a criminal referral to the Justice Department against former President Donald Trump, Rep. Liz Cheney said.

“It’s a decision that we’ll make together as a committee,” the Wyoming Republican said in an interview with ABC News’ “This Week” that aired Sunday.

Committee members have appeared to be divided over whether it would potentially refer a case against Trump, who some believe is to blame for the 2021 attack. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-MS, who chairs the committee, said last month that while if the DOJ examines the hearings and decides to review it further they would, but making a criminal referral is “not our job.”

Others on the committee, including Cheney, quickly shot back, saying that the committee has yet to vote on whether it would recommend criminal referrals to the department.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/03/che...ould-refer-a-criminal-case-against-trump.html

Whether they do or not the committee will be passing along to the DoJ more than enough information to sustain multiple indictments of Trump.

 

[hadit]

words complicate yer life.

i get it. maybe i should useView attachment 665707 pictures?

Well, that covers Orange Man Bad. If a picture's worth 1,000 words, I'm still saving a lot of words.

 

[hadit]

The work you dopes have to put in to trying to stay ahead of this must be exhausting. At what point does he cease to be worth it? When do you just say enough and move on ?

About the time he ceases to be your cover excuse for Quid Pro Joe. It's still exceedingly rare for a thread about Quid Pro to go more than a handful of posts before the inevitable stumble by posting about TRUMP!. You do know, don't you, that the worst thing you can do to TRUMP! is to ignore him, right?

 

[bripat9643]

Jebus Crisco!

This is NOT a legal proceeding. This is simply a hearing to inform the public of the who, what, where, when, why and how January 6th riot and that obstruction of the official counting of electors, came about, and what did the president know, and when did he know it, type stuff.

If the DOJ investigates for legal purposes, they won't use hearsay.

If it's not a legal proceeding, whatever that nebulous term is supposed to mean, then why can witnesses go to jail if they lie?

 

[eagle1462010]

Pay attention! The crimes committed by the Trump team have always been evident to anyone with the ability to see with clear eyes, what is going on, around them.

This is just filling in some gaps and putting faces, on those involved!


And maybe it's a wake up jolt, to some on your aisle that have been stuck in their right wing media prism.

Tds isnt proof. Proof is the uncovering and FISA abuse by the veggie in chief during Obama. Which has proof backed up by the FISA courts themselves.

Proof is the over 500 riots in the summer of love that Your side Hyped up causing violence.

Proof is the IRS and many agencies attacking non profits to try to make sure they neber exist.

Proof is veggie 1 using his influence to get money in Ukraine through his son. Where is that impeachment?

This is just another show by those inflicted with TDS and a Swamp that has been exposed for being pond scum.

 

[eagle1462010]

If it's not a legal proceeding, whatever that nebulous term is supposed to mean, then why can witnesses go to jail if they lie?

It is a fishing trip looking for a crime. And it throws back fish caught from their own side.

The FBI has been shown in the protest Inciting Riot. So has the BLM. No extra security and opened up doors to let them in.

The left and swamp are corrupt beyond Nero's Rome

 

[berg80]

It’s possible the Jan. 6 committee refers a criminal case against Trump, Liz Cheney says

It’s still possible that the Jan. 6 committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol makes a criminal referral to the Justice Department against former President Donald Trump, Rep. Liz Cheney said.

“It’s a decision that we’ll make together as a committee,” the Wyoming Republican said in an interview with ABC News’ “This Week” that aired Sunday.

Committee members have appeared to be divided over whether it would potentially refer a case against Trump, who some believe is to blame for the 2021 attack. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-MS, who chairs the committee, said last month that while if the DOJ examines the hearings and decides to review it further they would, but making a criminal referral is “not our job.”

Others on the committee, including Cheney, quickly shot back, saying that the committee has yet to vote on whether it would recommend criminal referrals to the department.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/03/che...ould-refer-a-criminal-case-against-trump.html

Whether they do or not the committee will be passing along to the DoJ more than enough information to sustain multiple indictments of Trump.

The New Yorker has reported Garland is getting a weekly briefing on the DoJ's progress with their investigation in to the criminality of 1/6 and surrounding events.

A Potential Criminal Prosecution of Donald Trump Is Growing Closer
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dail...prosecution-of-donald-trump-is-growing-closer

 

[Calypso Jones]

Bombshells.......are empty. Like de bombashells made in Schindler's factory.

 

[playtime]

She wasn't there, she was repeating what she was told by Tony Ornato, who also wasn't there, but allegedly was updated on it.

& has yet to testify UNDER OATH like the very brave cassidy hutchinson.

 

[playtime]

It doesn't matter she said it happened she lied.

has it been contradicted under oath by anyone disputing it?

no? well then ... unless or until that happens; your ilk has nothing to hang yer MAGA cap on.

 

[playtime]

Well, that covers Orange Man Bad. If a picture's worth 1,000 words, I'm still saving a lot of words.

no you're not ... it just means you can't debate worth a damn to defend the chosen one.

you played hooky the day they taught critical thinging, huh?

 

[playtime]

If it's not a legal proceeding, whatever that nebulous term is supposed to mean, then why can witnesses go to jail if they lie?

ummmm ... congress has to refer a criminal charge to the DOJ, who then decides whether to indict - which THEN goes in front of a judge/goes to trial; THEN it's a criminal matter. howverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..........if you lie under oath in a court of LAW - it AUTOMATICALLY becomes a bigley issue for jail time.

.

 

[Nostra]

The New Yorker has reported Garland is getting a weekly briefing on the DoJ's progress with their investigation in to the criminality of 1/6 and surrounding events.

A Potential Criminal Prosecution of Donald Trump Is Growing Closer
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dail...prosecution-of-donald-trump-is-growing-closer

Any. Day. Now.

 

[Seymour Flops]

& has yet to testify UNDER OATH like the very brave cassidy hutchinson.

Actually, he has already appeared before the committee and testified under oath. The committee has not chosen to show you his testimony.

Now, they are smearing him as a liar before he can speak publicly.

No shame at all.