Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,337
- 80,982
- 2,635
Is that why you're denying the reality that ISIL was Al-qaeda in Iraq before being known as ISIL? Because you're trying to deny Bush is responsible for that terrorist organization?Moron, the reason I'm pointing out how ISIL was Al-qaeda in Iraq before being called ISIL is because ISIL was Al-qaeda in Iraq before being called ISIL.ISIL called themselves Al-qaeda in Iraq before calling themselves ISIL. WTF is wrong with you? How fucking thick headed are you?No, denial is not a river. I just gave you a link explaining their history going back to Al-qaeda in Iraq.
Sticking your fingers in your ears while moaning, nuh-uh, doesn't actually refute reality. Just so ya know.
What you "gave" me was Al Queda's history going back to Bush's time in Iraq...ISIS grew to power in Syria after Bush had left office and then crossed the border in force into Iraq after Barry did his "leading from behind" thing and pulled out our combat troops against the advice of his military advisors.
ISIS would have been just another little splinter group breaking off from Al Queda if it wasn't for Barack Obama's total failure to address their growing strength. Or have you forgotten "JV Team"? ISIS increased in strength and influence over shadowing it's parent group Al Queda (who had disavowed them) BECAUSE Barry was so determined to be able to claim he'd "ended" the war in Iraq on the campaign trail that he ignored the advice of his military leaders!
The reason you're so determined to claim that ISIS is just another renaming of a group that existed while Bush is President is that you don't want to admit how badly Obama misjudged ISIS.
You should try dealing with reality sometime.
No, the reason you're doing what you're doing...is that you're trying desperately to excuse some really bad decisions that Barack Obama made by claiming it's Bush's fault.